Seymour R J, Lacefield W E
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1985 Feb;66(2):103-8.
Eight wheelchair cushions representing five types of materials were evaluated in two population groups, able-bodied and spinal cord injured (SCI). Objective factors such as area of first light, pressure, tuberosity and thigh temperatures, and subjective factors such as cosmesis, handling ability, and purchase were studied. Twenty subjects (10 men and 10 women; 10 SCI and 10 able-bodied) from 16 to 35 years of age were chosen to participate in the study. Pressure was measured with the Pressure Evaluation Pad and skin temperature of each ischial tuberosity and posterior thigh was determined. Temperature differences were not significant among cushions but the alternating pressure and foam cushions produced consistently higher temperatures compared to other cushions for both groups of subjects. No significant differences among cushions were found for area of first light, cosmesis, handling ability, or purchase. However, three cushions were rated acceptable in cosmesis while three different cushions were rated acceptable in handling ability by all subjects. No cushion rated a perfect score by all subjects regarding purchase but all the SCI subjects said they would purchase the air-filled cushion. Overall pressure differences were not significant but large individual variations were observed. The authors believe that pressure produced by wheelchair cushions should be measured with a standard device such as the Pressure Evaluation Pad, and that, to reduce the incidence of pressure sores, cushion use in each patient should be modified on the basis of initial and periodic assessment of both objective and subjective factors.
对代表五种材料类型的八个轮椅坐垫在两组人群中进行了评估,即健全人群和脊髓损伤(SCI)人群。研究了诸如首次出现压红区域、压力、坐骨结节和大腿温度等客观因素,以及诸如外观、使用便利性和购买意愿等主观因素。选取了20名年龄在16至35岁之间的受试者(10名男性和10名女性;10名脊髓损伤患者和10名健全人)参与该研究。使用压力评估垫测量压力,并测定每个坐骨结节和大腿后侧的皮肤温度。不同坐垫之间的温度差异不显著,但对于两组受试者而言,交替压力坐垫和泡沫坐垫的温度始终高于其他坐垫。在首次出现压红区域、外观、使用便利性或购买意愿方面,不同坐垫之间未发现显著差异。然而,所有受试者中,有三款坐垫在外观方面被评为可接受,另有三款不同的坐垫在使用便利性方面被评为可接受。在购买意愿方面,没有一款坐垫被所有受试者评为满分,但所有脊髓损伤受试者表示他们会购买充气坐垫。总体压力差异不显著,但观察到个体差异较大。作者认为,轮椅坐垫产生的压力应以诸如压力评估垫这样的标准设备进行测量,并且为了降低压疮的发生率,应根据对客观和主观因素的初始及定期评估,对每位患者的坐垫使用情况进行调整。