Rollins D L, Towne J B, Bernhard V M, Baum P L
Arch Surg. 1985 Mar;120(3):367-9. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1985.01390270105018.
Eighty-six patients underwent 90 profundaplasties for lower extremity ischemia using endarterectomized superficial femoral artery (ESFA) or vein as an arterial patch. Standard length profundaplasty was performed in 60 limbs and extended profundaplasty in 28. Seventy-two were performed for limb salvage and 18 for severe claudication. Fifty-four limbs underwent inflow reconstruction and profundaplasty, while 36 others had profundaplasty alone. Three-year cumulative patency rates were employed to compare the type of autogenous patch material to the profundaplasty length, operative indications, and procedures. In all groups, ESFA performed as well as vein. Endarterectomized superficial femoral artery patch angioplasty provides comparable long-term results to vein patch in patients undergoing profundaplasty, and demonstrates its durability as a vascular patch in situations where autogenous tissue is required or preferred while preserving the saphenous vein for later use.
86例患者接受了90次下肢缺血性手术,使用内膜剥脱后的股浅动脉(ESFA)或静脉作为动脉补片进行股深动脉成形术。60条肢体进行了标准长度的股深动脉成形术,28条进行了延长的股深动脉成形术。72例手术目的是挽救肢体,18例是为了治疗严重间歇性跛行。54条肢体同时进行了流入道重建和股深动脉成形术,另外36条肢体仅进行了股深动脉成形术。采用三年累积通畅率来比较自体补片材料类型与股深动脉成形术的长度、手术指征及手术方式。在所有组中,ESFA的效果与静脉相当。对于接受股深动脉成形术的患者,内膜剥脱后的股浅动脉补片血管成形术与静脉补片具有相似的长期效果,并且在需要或更倾向于使用自体组织的情况下,在保留大隐静脉以供后续使用时,显示出其作为血管补片的耐用性。