Suppr超能文献

皮肤准备对手术部位感染及粘性手术巾揭除的影响。

Influence of skin preparation on surgical site infection and lift of adhesive surgical drapes.

作者信息

Gant James W, Collins Josh E, Miller Zachary A, Einsporn Richard L

机构信息

Metropolitan Veterinary Hospital, Akron, Ohio, USA.

The University of Akron, Akron, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

Vet Surg. 2025 Apr;54(3):478-485. doi: 10.1111/vsu.14198. Epub 2024 Dec 20.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the influence on surgical site infection (SSI) rates when using 0.7% iodophor and 74% isopropyl alcohol versus 2% chlorhexidine and 70% isopropyl alcohol. To evaluate the adherence of an iodophor-impregnated surgical incise drape when used in conjunction with 0.7% iodophor and 74% isopropyl alcohol.

STUDY DESIGN

Combines retrospective control and prospective data.

SAMPLE POPULATION

This study included dogs and cats, 653 retrospective cases and 435 prospective cases, with 447 incisions.

METHODS

The SSI rate of a 2% chlorhexidine and 70% isopropyl alcohol preparation was retrospectively reviewed. The prospective population received 0.7% iodophor and 74% isopropyl alcohol; risk factors for SSI were evaluated and incise drape lift was documented.

RESULTS

A 1.8% difference in SSI between the chlorhexidine group and 0.7% iodophor and 74% isopropyl alcohol group was found (p = .25). The drape lift was 13.2%. Drape lift (p = .026), increased body weight (p = .008), and the use of glutaraldehyde for instrument sterilization (p = .055) were associated with an increased risk of SSI development.

CONCLUSION

The 0.7% iodophor and 74% isopropyl alcohol treatments demonstrated similar effectiveness to 2% chlorhexidine and 70% isopropyl alcohol in skin preparation. Using an iodophor-impregnated drape with 0.7% iodophor and 74% isopropyl alcohol reduced both drape lift and the risk of SSI.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

These findings support the combined use of an incise drape with 0.7% iodophor and 74% isopropyl alcohol preparation, provide evidence against the use of glutaraldehyde, and indicate that heavier patients have an increased risk of SSI.

摘要

目的

确定使用0.7%碘伏和74%异丙醇与2%氯己定和70%异丙醇相比对外科手术部位感染(SSI)率的影响。评估碘伏浸渍手术切口单与0.7%碘伏和74%异丙醇联合使用时的贴合度。

研究设计

结合回顾性对照和前瞻性数据。

样本群体

本研究包括犬猫,回顾性病例653例,前瞻性病例435例,切口447个。

方法

回顾性分析2%氯己定和70%异丙醇制剂的SSI率。前瞻性群体接受0.7%碘伏和74%异丙醇;评估SSI的危险因素并记录切口单掀起情况。

结果

氯己定组与0.7%碘伏和74%异丙醇组之间的SSI差异为1.8%(p = 0.25)。切口单掀起率为13.2%。切口单掀起(p = 0.026)、体重增加(p = 0.008)以及使用戊二醛进行器械灭菌(p = 0.055)与SSI发生风险增加相关。

结论

在皮肤准备方面,0.7%碘伏和74%异丙醇处理显示出与2%氯己定和70%异丙醇相似的效果。使用含0.7%碘伏和74%异丙醇的碘伏浸渍手术单可降低切口单掀起率和SSI风险。

临床意义

这些发现支持将切口单与0.7%碘伏和74%异丙醇制剂联合使用,提供了反对使用戊二醛的证据,并表明体重较重的患者发生SSI的风险增加。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验