• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Workforce Psychological Distress and Absenteeism in Australia: The Correlates of Industry, Age, and Gender.澳大利亚劳动力的心理困扰与旷工现象:行业、年龄和性别的相关因素
Asia Pac J Public Health. 2025 Mar;37(2-3):218-228. doi: 10.1177/10105395241306477. Epub 2024 Dec 21.
2
Correlates of psychological distress among workers in the mining industry in remote Australia: Evidence from a multi-site cross-sectional survey.澳大利亚偏远地区采矿业工人心理困扰的相关因素:多地点横断面调查的证据。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 20;13(12):e0209377. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209377. eCollection 2018.
3
Industry differences in psychological distress and distress-related productivity loss: A cross-sectional study of Australian workers.行业差异对心理困扰及困扰相关生产力损失的影响:澳大利亚劳动者的横断面研究。
J Occup Health. 2023 Jan-Dec;65(1):e12428. doi: 10.1002/1348-9585.12428.
4
Costs of Presenteeism and Absenteeism Associated With Psychological Distress Among Male and Female Older Workers: A Cross-sectional Study.心理困扰与中老年男性和女性员工的出勤和缺勤成本:一项横断面研究。
J Occup Environ Med. 2024 Oct 1;66(10):e467-e475. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000003182. Epub 2024 Jul 5.
5
The Contribution of Individual, Social and Work Characteristics to Employee Mental Health in a Coal Mining Industry Population.个体、社会和工作特征对煤矿行业员工心理健康的影响
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 3;12(1):e0168445. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168445. eCollection 2017.
6
The prevalence of psychological distress and its associated sociodemographic factors in the Australian adults aged 18-64 years during COVID-19: Data from the Australian National Health Survey.在 COVID-19 期间,18-64 岁澳大利亚成年人中心理困扰的流行率及其相关社会人口因素:来自澳大利亚国家健康调查的数据。
J Affect Disord. 2025 Jan 1;368:312-319. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.09.085. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
7
Workplace bullying and psychological distress of employees across socioeconomic strata: a cross-sectional study.工作场所欺凌与社会经济阶层员工心理困扰的关系:一项横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jun 13;19(Suppl 4):608. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6859-1.
8
The prevalence and correlates of psychological distress in Australian tertiary students compared to their community peers.与社区同龄人相比,澳大利亚大学生中心理困扰的流行率及其相关因素。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2012 May;46(5):457-67. doi: 10.1177/0004867411435290. Epub 2012 Jan 16.
9
Psychological distress, related work attendance, and productivity loss in small-to-medium enterprise owner/managers.中小企业所有者/管理者的心理困扰、相关工作出勤和生产力损失。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013 Oct 15;10(10):5062-82. doi: 10.3390/ijerph10105062.
10
Patterns and Prevalence of Daily Tobacco Smoking in Australia by Industry and Occupation: 2007-2016.澳大利亚按行业和职业划分的日常吸烟模式和流行率:2007-2016 年。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2021 Nov 5;23(12):2047-2055. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntab126.

本文引用的文献

1
Work-related causes of mental health conditions and interventions for their improvement in workplaces.工作相关的心理健康问题的原因,以及改善工作场所心理健康的干预措施。
Lancet. 2023 Oct 14;402(10410):1368-1381. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00869-3.
2
Work as a social determinant of health in high-income countries: past, present, and future.工作是高收入国家健康的社会决定因素:过去、现在和未来。
Lancet. 2023 Oct 14;402(10410):1357-1367. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00871-1.
3
Industry differences in psychological distress and distress-related productivity loss: A cross-sectional study of Australian workers.行业差异对心理困扰及困扰相关生产力损失的影响:澳大利亚劳动者的横断面研究。
J Occup Health. 2023 Jan-Dec;65(1):e12428. doi: 10.1002/1348-9585.12428.
4
Psychological distress and digital health service use during COVID-19: A national Australian cross-sectional survey.COVID-19期间的心理困扰与数字健康服务使用情况:一项澳大利亚全国性横断面调查。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Oct 20;13:1028384. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1028384. eCollection 2022.
5
Effect of lockdown on mental health in Australia: evidence from a natural experiment analysing a longitudinal probability sample survey.封锁对澳大利亚心理健康的影响:基于分析纵向概率抽样调查的自然实验证据。
Lancet Public Health. 2022 May;7(5):e427-e436. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(22)00082-2. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
6
Mental Health in Australia: Psychological Distress Reported in Six Consecutive Cross-Sectional National Surveys From 2001 to 2018.澳大利亚的心理健康:2001年至2018年连续六次全国横断面调查中报告的心理困扰情况
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Apr 1;13:815904. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.815904. eCollection 2022.
7
Trends in the Prevalence of Psychological Distress Over Time: Comparing Results From Longitudinal and Repeated Cross-Sectional Surveys.心理困扰患病率随时间的变化趋势:纵向调查与重复横断面调查结果比较
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Nov 26;11:595696. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.595696. eCollection 2020.
8
How do state policies shape experiences of household income shocks and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic?国家政策如何塑造 COVID-19 大流行期间家庭收入冲击和心理健康的体验?
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Jan;269:113557. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113557. Epub 2020 Nov 29.
9
Mental health before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal probability sample survey of the UK population.新冠疫情之前及期间的心理健康状况:一项针对英国人群的纵向概率抽样调查
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Oct;7(10):883-892. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30308-4. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
10
Psychological distress among migrant groups in Australia: results from the 2015 National Health Survey.澳大利亚移民群体的心理困扰:来自 2015 年全国健康调查的结果。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2020 Apr;55(4):467-475. doi: 10.1007/s00127-019-01782-y. Epub 2019 Oct 28.

澳大利亚劳动力的心理困扰与旷工现象:行业、年龄和性别的相关因素

Workforce Psychological Distress and Absenteeism in Australia: The Correlates of Industry, Age, and Gender.

作者信息

Burns Kristy, Ellis Louise A, Neto Abilio De Almeida, Amin Janaki

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Asia Pac J Public Health. 2025 Mar;37(2-3):218-228. doi: 10.1177/10105395241306477. Epub 2024 Dec 21.

DOI:10.1177/10105395241306477
PMID:39707834
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11969886/
Abstract

The workplace is an important setting for improving population psychological health. This study aimed to identify priority industries and populations in Australia with highest adverse effects of psychological distress. The study included 5834 workers aged 18 to 64 years who participated in the 2020 to 2021 National Health Survey. Logistic regression analyses were used to estimate the prevalence of psychological distress by industry, age group, and gender. Productivity losses were analyzed using negative binomial regression. Increased odds of experiencing distress were found for younger workers 18 to 29 years (odds ratio [OR] = 2. 45) and female workers (OR = 1.52). Industry of employment did not impact distress once age and gender were accounted for ( = .956). Being highly/very highly distressed resulted in a mean of 21.56 more distress-related loss days per year (0.78 vs 22.34) compared with low/moderate distress. Targeted and tailored workplace intervention programs for these groups are required to build a healthy and productive future workforce.

摘要

工作场所是改善人群心理健康的重要环境。本研究旨在确定澳大利亚心理困扰负面影响最大的重点行业和人群。该研究纳入了5834名年龄在18至64岁之间、参与了2020年至2021年全国健康调查的工人。采用逻辑回归分析按行业、年龄组和性别估计心理困扰的患病率。使用负二项回归分析生产力损失。发现18至29岁的年轻工人(优势比[OR]=2.45)和女性工人(OR=1.52)经历困扰的几率增加。一旦考虑年龄和性别因素,就业行业对困扰没有影响(P = 0.956)。与低度/中度困扰相比,高度/非常高度困扰导致每年与困扰相关的损失天数平均多21.56天(0.78天对22.34天)。需要针对这些群体制定有针对性和量身定制的工作场所干预计划,以打造健康且高效的未来劳动力队伍。