• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非洲的基因组学与健康数据治理:实现大数据使用的民主化并推广公众参与。

Genomics and Health Data Governance in Africa: Democratize the Use of Big Data and Popularize Public Engagement.

作者信息

Munung Nchangwi Syntia, Royal Charmaine D, de Kock Carmen, Awandare Gordon, Nembaware Victoria, Nguefack Seraphin, Treadwell Marsha, Wonkam Ambroise

出版信息

Hastings Cent Rep. 2024 Dec;54 Suppl 2:S84-S92. doi: 10.1002/hast.4933.

DOI:10.1002/hast.4933
PMID:39707935
Abstract

Effectively addressing ethical issues in precision medicine research in Africa requires a holistic social contract that integrates biomedical knowledge with local cultural values and Indigenous knowledge systems. Drawing on African epistemologies such as ubuntu and ujamaa and on our collective experiences in genomics and big data research for sickle cell disease, hearing impairment, and fragile X syndrome and the project Public Understanding of Big Data in Genomics Medicine in Africa, we envision a transformative shift in health research data governance in Africa that could help create a sense of shared responsibility between all stakeholders in genomics and data-driven health research in Africa. This shift includes proposing a social contract for genomics and data science in health research that is grounded in African communitarianism such as solidarity, shared decision-making, and reciprocity. We make several recommendations for a social contract for genomics and data science in health, including the coproduction of genomics knowledge with study communities, power sharing between stakeholders, public education on the ethical and social implications of genetics and data science, benefit sharing, giving voice to data subjects through dynamic consent, and democratizing data access to allow wide access by all research stakeholders. Achieving this would require adopting participatory approaches to genomics and data governance.

摘要

要有效解决非洲精准医学研究中的伦理问题,需要一份全面的社会契约,将生物医学知识与当地文化价值观和本土知识体系结合起来。借鉴诸如乌班图和乌贾马等非洲认识论,以及我们在镰状细胞病、听力障碍和脆性X综合征的基因组学和大数据研究以及非洲基因组医学大数据公众理解项目中的集体经验,我们设想非洲卫生研究数据治理发生变革性转变,这有助于在非洲基因组学和数据驱动的卫生研究的所有利益相关者之间营造一种共同责任感。这种转变包括为卫生研究中的基因组学和数据科学提出一份基于非洲社群主义(如团结、共同决策和互惠)的社会契约。我们就卫生领域基因组学和数据科学的社会契约提出了若干建议,包括与研究社区共同生成基因组学知识、利益相关者之间分享权力、对遗传学和数据科学的伦理和社会影响进行公众教育、利益分享、通过动态同意让数据主体发声,以及使数据获取民主化,以便所有研究利益相关者都能广泛获取。实现这一目标需要在基因组学和数据治理中采用参与式方法。

相似文献

1
Genomics and Health Data Governance in Africa: Democratize the Use of Big Data and Popularize Public Engagement.非洲的基因组学与健康数据治理:实现大数据使用的民主化并推广公众参与。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2024 Dec;54 Suppl 2:S84-S92. doi: 10.1002/hast.4933.
2
Towards equitable genomics governance in Africa: Guiding principles from theories of global health governance and the African moral theory of Ubuntu.迈向非洲公平的基因组学治理:全球卫生治理理论和非洲乌班图道德理论的指导原则。
Bioethics. 2022 May;36(4):411-422. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12995. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
3
Genomics governance: advancing justice, fairness and equity through the lens of the African communitarian ethic of Ubuntu.基因组学治理:通过非洲社区伦理 Ubuntu 的视角推进公正、公平和平等
Med Health Care Philos. 2021 Sep;24(3):377-388. doi: 10.1007/s11019-021-10012-9. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
4
Negotiating Requests for Reimbursement for Community Engagement: Challenges in Developing an Educational Video for Genomic Biobanking Research in South Africa.协商社区参与报销申请:为南非基因组生物样本库研究制作教育视频面临的挑战
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2019 Dec;14(5):501-503. doi: 10.1177/1556264619856223. Epub 2019 Jun 22.
5
Becoming partners, retaining autonomy: ethical considerations on the development of precision medicine.成为合作伙伴,保持自主性:精准医学发展中的伦理考量
BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Nov 4;17(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0149-6.
6
Better governance, better access: practising responsible data sharing in the METADAC governance infrastructure.更好的治理,更好的获取:在 METADAC 治理基础设施中实践负责任的数据共享。
Hum Genomics. 2018 Apr 26;12(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s40246-018-0154-6.
7
"It's all about trust": reflections of researchers on the complexity and controversy surrounding biobanking in South Africa.“一切都关乎信任”:研究人员对南非生物样本库相关复杂性与争议的反思
BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Oct 10;17(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0140-2.
8
Tygerberg Research Ubuntu-Inspired Community Engagement Model: Integrating Community Engagement into Genomic Biobanking.泰格堡研究受乌班图启发的社区参与模式:将社区参与融入基因组生物样本库
Biopreserv Biobank. 2019 Dec;17(6):613-624. doi: 10.1089/bio.2018.0136. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
9
Citizen science or scientific citizenship? Disentangling the uses of public engagement rhetoric in national research initiatives.公民科学还是科学公民身份?厘清国家研究计划中公众参与言辞的用途。
BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Jun 4;17(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0117-1.
10
Balancing the local and the universal in maintaining ethical access to a genomics biobank.在维持对基因组生物样本库的伦理获取方面平衡地方与普遍因素。
BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Dec 28;18(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12910-017-0240-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Cultivating an equity-oriented data sharing culture for African health research initiatives.为非洲卫生研究倡议培育一种以公平为导向的数据共享文化。
Nat Commun. 2025 Aug 30;16(1):8122. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-63289-2.
2
Science and Society: Pathways to Equitable Access and Delivery of Genomics Medicine in Africa.科学与社会:非洲实现基因组医学公平获取与提供的途径
Curr Genet Med Rep. 2025;13(1):1. doi: 10.1007/s40142-024-00211-0. Epub 2025 Feb 24.