• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

金标准经尿道前列腺切除术(TUR-P):体积越大,速度越高,但切除体积超过60克至关重要。

Goldstandard TUR-P: the bigger the volume, the higher the speed, but resected volumes of more than 60g are critical.

作者信息

Schulte-Baukloh Heinrich, Weber Markus, Höppner Dirk, Heidenreich Holger, Schlomm Thorsten, Weinberger Sarah, Enzmann Thomas, Ralla Bernhard

机构信息

Department of Urology, Charité-University Hospital Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany.

Urologic Practice Turmstrasse, Berlin-MitteMoabit, Germany.

出版信息

Int Urol Nephrol. 2025 May;57(5):1415-1423. doi: 10.1007/s11255-024-04329-6. Epub 2024 Dec 21.

DOI:10.1007/s11255-024-04329-6
PMID:39708193
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12003567/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

According to the European Association of Urology guidelines, the limit for monopolar, transurethral resection (M-TURP) in BPH- therapy is a volume of 80 g. However, whether larger prostates can also be resected transurethrally might also depend on the experience of the surgeon and especially the resected volume and speed of the resection. Little is known about the latter, and this paper aims to these factors.

METHODS

This study included 540 patients who received a single-stage M-TURP. Based on the postoperative resection weight, these were divided into four groups: group 1 with 10 to 59.9 g, group 2 with 60 to 79.9 g, group 3 with 80 to 99.9 g, and group 4 with ≥ 100 g. We examined patient age, the ASA-score, the IPSS, quality of life, resection weight, time and speed, pre- and postoperative hemoglobin and serum sodium values, complications, and surgeon experience.

RESULTS

The mean resection weight was 41.6 g, and the mean values for resection time and speed were 61.3 min and 0.7 g/min, respectively. The resection speed increased significantly with resection weight (from 0.7 to 1.3 g/min) as well as with the surgeon's level of experience (from 0.4 to 0.9 g/min). The number of serious complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ IIIb) increased significantly from a resection volume of 59.5 g (cut-off value). The resection speed of M-TURP increased significantly with the resection weight and the surgeon's level of experience. Regardless of speed, resection weight of more than 60 g might increase the risk of severe complications.

摘要

背景

根据欧洲泌尿外科学会指南,良性前列腺增生症(BPH)治疗中经尿道单极切除术(M-TURP)的限度是前列腺体积为80克。然而,更大体积的前列腺是否也能经尿道切除可能还取决于外科医生的经验,尤其是切除体积和切除速度。关于后者知之甚少,本文旨在研究这些因素。

方法

本研究纳入了540例行一期M-TURP的患者。根据术后切除重量,将他们分为四组:第1组为10至59.9克,第2组为60至79.9克,第3组为80至99.9克,第4组为≥100克。我们检查了患者年龄、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分、国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)、生活质量、切除重量、时间和速度、术前和术后血红蛋白及血清钠值、并发症以及外科医生经验。

结果

平均切除重量为41.6克,切除时间和速度的平均值分别为61.3分钟和0.7克/分钟。切除速度随切除重量(从0.7克/分钟增至1.3克/分钟)以及外科医生的经验水平(从0.4克/分钟增至0.9克/分钟)显著增加。严重并发症(Clavien-Dindo≥IIIb级)的数量从切除体积59.5克(临界值)起显著增加。M-TURP的切除速度随切除重量和外科医生的经验水平显著增加。无论速度如何,切除重量超过60克可能会增加严重并发症的风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceca/12003567/6785b57bdbb6/11255_2024_4329_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceca/12003567/26e8eb84e591/11255_2024_4329_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceca/12003567/6785b57bdbb6/11255_2024_4329_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceca/12003567/26e8eb84e591/11255_2024_4329_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ceca/12003567/6785b57bdbb6/11255_2024_4329_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Goldstandard TUR-P: the bigger the volume, the higher the speed, but resected volumes of more than 60g are critical.金标准经尿道前列腺切除术(TUR-P):体积越大,速度越高,但切除体积超过60克至关重要。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2025 May;57(5):1415-1423. doi: 10.1007/s11255-024-04329-6. Epub 2024 Dec 21.
2
[Transurethral diode laser enucleation versus transurethral electrovaporization resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia with different prostate volumes].[经尿道二极管激光剜除术与经尿道电汽化切除术治疗不同前列腺体积的良性前列腺增生症的比较]
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. 2017 Mar;23(3):217-222.
3
Bipolar transurethral enucleation and resection of the prostate versus bipolar resection of the prostate for prostates larger than 60gr: A retrospective study at a single academic tertiary care center.双极经尿道前列腺剜除术与前列腺电切术治疗大于60克前列腺的比较:单学术三级医疗中心的回顾性研究
Int Braz J Urol. 2016 Jul-Aug;42(4):747-56. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0225.
4
Monopolar enucleation versus transurethral resection of the prostate for small- and medium-sized (< 80 cc) benign prostate hyperplasia: a prospective analysis.经尿道前列腺切除术与单极前列腺切除术治疗小至中等大小(<80 cc)良性前列腺增生症的前瞻性分析。
World J Urol. 2020 Jan;38(1):167-173. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02757-z. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
5
Prostate resected weight and postoperative prostate cancer incidence after transurethral resection of the prostate: A population-based study.经尿道前列腺切除术后的前列腺切除重量与术后前列腺癌发病率:一项基于人群的研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jan;98(3):e13897. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013897.
6
Transurethral vapor resection of prostate is a good alternative for prostates >70 g.经尿道前列腺汽化切除术对于重量超过70克的前列腺是一种不错的选择。
J Endourol. 2007 Dec;21(12):1543-6. doi: 10.1089/end.2006.0285.
7
Efficacy and Safety Evaluation of Transurethral Resection of the Prostate versus Plasmakinetic Enucleation of the Prostate in the Treatment of Massive Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.经尿道前列腺切除术与等离子前列腺剜除术治疗巨大良性前列腺增生的疗效和安全性评价。
Urol Int. 2021;105(9-10):735-742. doi: 10.1159/000511116. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
8
Vapor resection: a good alternative to standard loop resection in the management of prostates >40 cc.汽化切除术:对于处理体积大于40立方厘米的前列腺,是标准环形切除术的良好替代方法。
J Endourol. 2002 Dec;16(10):767-71. doi: 10.1089/08927790260472944.
9
The role of the bipolar plasmakinetic TURP over 100 g prostate in the elderly patients.双极等离子体动力学经尿道前列腺切除术在老年患者大于100克前列腺中的作用。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2014 Nov;46(11):2071-7. doi: 10.1007/s11255-014-0803-1. Epub 2014 Aug 19.
10
Prospective randomized study comparing monopolar with bipolar transurethral resection of prostate in benign prostatic obstruction: 36-month outcomes.前瞻性随机研究比较良性前列腺梗阻中经尿道前列腺切除术的单极与双极:36 个月的结果。
World J Urol. 2017 Oct;35(10):1595-1601. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2023-7. Epub 2017 Feb 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Benign prostatic hyperplasia surgical treatment trends in the Public Health System in São Paulo, Brazil.巴西圣保罗公共卫生系统中良性前列腺增生的手术治疗趋势。
Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2022 Jun 17;20:eAO6880. doi: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2022AO6880. eCollection 2022.
2
Erectile Function Following Surgery for Benign Prostatic Obstruction: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.良性前列腺梗阻手术后的勃起功能:随机对照试验的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Eur Urol. 2021 Aug;80(2):174-187. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.04.012. Epub 2021 Jun 12.
3
How Accurately Can Prostate Gland Imaging Measure the Prostate Gland Volume? Results of a Systematic Review.
前列腺成像测量前列腺体积的准确性如何?一项系统评价的结果。
Prostate Cancer. 2019 Mar 3;2019:6932572. doi: 10.1155/2019/6932572. eCollection 2019.
4
The effect of complete transurethral resection of the prostate on symptoms, quality of life, and voiding function improvement.前列腺完全经尿道切除术对症状、生活质量及排尿功能改善的影响。
Cent European J Urol. 2015;68(2):169-74. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2015.507. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
5
A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Functional Outcomes and Complications Following Transurethral Procedures for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Resulting from Benign Prostatic Obstruction: An Update.经尿道前列腺切除术治疗良性前列腺梗阻所致下尿路症状的功能结局和并发症的系统评价和荟萃分析:更新
Eur Urol. 2015 Jun;67(6):1066-1096. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.06.017. Epub 2014 Jun 25.
6
Conventional monopolar transurethral resection of prostate in patients with large prostate (≥80 grams).大前列腺(≥80克)患者的传统单极经尿道前列腺切除术。
Cent European J Urol. 2013;66(3):303-8. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2013.03.art13. Epub 2013 Nov 18.
7
Examining the 'gold standard': a comparative critical analysis of three consecutive decades of monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) outcomes.探讨“金标准”:连续三个十年的经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)结果的比较性批判性分析。
BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11):1595-601. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11119.x. Epub 2012 Apr 30.
8
Effect of the ratio of resected tissue in comparison with the prostate transitional zone volume on voiding function improvement after transurethral resection of prostate.经尿道前列腺切除术切除组织与前列腺移行区体积比值对改善排尿功能的影响。
Urology. 2012 Jan;79(1):202-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.07.1397. Epub 2011 Oct 19.
9
Comparison of effectiveness of monopolar and bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate and open prostatectomy in large benign prostatic hyperplasia.单极与双极经尿道前列腺切除术及开放性前列腺切除术治疗巨大良性前列腺增生症的疗效比较
Korean J Urol. 2011 Apr;52(4):269-73. doi: 10.4111/kju.2011.52.4.269. Epub 2011 Apr 22.
10
TURP for BPH. How large is too large?经尿道前列腺切除术治疗良性前列腺增生。多大算太大?
J Med Life. 2010 Oct-Dec;3(4):376-80.