Xie Yang, Zhang Peng, Ren Jiaming, Chen Tao, Wang Jiajia, Li Jiansheng
Department of Respiratory Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, China.
Collaborative Innovation Center for Chinese Medicine and Respiratory Diseases Co-Construction by Henan Province & Education Ministry of P.R. China, Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, China.
J Evid Based Med. 2024 Dec;17(4):758-770. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12659. Epub 2024 Dec 21.
To develop and validate the patient-reported outcome scale for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF-PRO) to provide a reliable and scientific measure for clinical trials on idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF).
We analyzed the relevant literature and medical records and conducted interviews and panel discussions to develop the conceptual framework and generate the item pool. We subjected the collected items to removal, mergence, or modification to form the initial scale through a qualitative review by experts and patients. Subsequently, we conducted two field surveys to select items for the final scale based on the classical test theory and item response theory (IRT). Finally, we conducted a formal survey to assess the measurement properties of the IPF-PRO.
The IPF-PRO included 18 items across four domains, namely physiology, psychology, environment, and satisfaction. The Cronbach's α coefficient and generalized coefficient of the IPF-PRO were 0.917 and 0.931, respectively. The content validity, structural validity, criterion validity, and discriminant validity all met relevant standards. The results of the item analysis based on IRT were considered acceptable. The ordinal logistic regression analysis findings showed that all items' p values were greater than 0.01 when the domain scores matched variables. The IPF-PRO response and completion rates were both 100%. The median completion time was 7 min [IRQ = 3.7 min (Q3 = 9.0 min, Q1 = 5.3 min)].
The 18-item IPF-PRO developed in this study has demonstrated good reliability and validity, indicating that it is a reliable and scientific measure for IPF clinical trials.
开发并验证特发性肺纤维化患者报告结局量表(IPF-PRO),为特发性肺纤维化(IPF)临床试验提供可靠且科学的测量工具。
我们分析了相关文献和病历,并进行访谈及小组讨论以构建概念框架并生成条目池。通过专家和患者的定性审查,对收集到的条目进行删除、合并或修改,形成初始量表。随后,我们进行了两项现场调查,基于经典测试理论和项目反应理论(IRT)选择最终量表的条目。最后,我们进行了一项正式调查以评估IPF-PRO的测量属性。
IPF-PRO包括四个领域的18个条目,即生理、心理、环境和满意度。IPF-PRO的Cronbach's α系数和广义系数分别为0.917和0.931。内容效度、结构效度、效标效度和区分效度均符合相关标准。基于IRT的项目分析结果被认为是可接受的。有序逻辑回归分析结果表明,当领域得分与变量匹配时,所有条目的p值均大于0.01。IPF-PRO的应答率和完成率均为100%。中位完成时间为7分钟[四分位距=3.7分钟(第三四分位数=9.0分钟,第一四分位数=5.3分钟)]。
本研究开发的18项IPF-PRO已证明具有良好的信度和效度,表明它是IPF临床试验的可靠且科学的测量工具。