Suppr超能文献

房颤更佳知情治疗结局注册研究(ORBIT - AF)中个体内的卒中 - 出血风险评分配对情况。

Stroke-bleeding risk score pairings within individuals in the outcomes registry for better informed treatment of atrial fibrillation (ORBIT-AF) registry.

作者信息

Jason Max J, Marzec Lucas N, Piccini Jonathan P, Shrader Peter, Pieper Karen S, Blanco Rosalia G, Fonarow Gregg C, Gersh Bernard J, Ho P Michael, Hylek Elaine, Kowey Peter R, Mahaffey Kenneth W, Steinberg Benjamin A, Peterson Eric D, Allen Larry A

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.

Department of Cardiology, Kaiser Permanente, Lafayette, CO, USA.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol. 2025 Feb 15;421:132912. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.132912. Epub 2024 Dec 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Decisions about stroke prevention strategies in atrial fibrillation (AF) typically balance thromboembolism reduction against increased bleeding from oral anticoagulation therapy (OAC). When determining eligibility for OAC, guidelines recommend calculation of thromboembolic event rates using a validated score such as CHA2DS2-VASc. In contrast, routine calculation of bleeding scores is not recommended, in part because many patient factors associated with an increased risk of bleeding are associated with an even larger increased risk of ischemic stroke. We set out to characterize patients by paired stroke and bleeding risk scores to understand the level of concordance.

METHODS

Between 2010 and 2016, we identified 20,451 AF patients in the Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation (ORBIT-AF) I and II Registries. We grouped patients by stroke and bleeding risk pairings: low and high stroke risk (CHA2DS2-VASc < and ≥2), low and high bleeding risk (ORBIT < and ≥ 4) and described treatment rates with OAC and antiplatelet (AP) therapy.

RESULTS

Most patients (68.6 %) were at high stroke and low bleeding risk. Patients at high bleeding risk (19.4 %) had high stroke risk (98.5 %). Treatment rates differed with combined OAC + AP therapy highest for patients at high stroke and bleeding risks. Ischemic and bleeding events were also highest in this group.

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly all AF patients in this cohort with high bleeding risk (ORBIT score ≥ 4) had high stroke risk (CHA2DS2-VASc ≥ 2), supporting that bleeding risk should not obviate the need for stroke prevention. In contrast, most at high stroke risk were at low bleeding risk (ORBIT <4), supporting OAC for the majority. Bleeding scores, in combination with factors that specifically indicate a higher risk of bleeding, may identify patients who might be candidates for alternative stroke prevention such as left atrial appendage occlusion devices or bleeding mitigation strategies such as de-escalation of antiplatelet therapy.

摘要

背景

心房颤动(AF)患者的卒中预防策略决策通常需在降低血栓栓塞风险与口服抗凝治疗(OAC)导致的出血风险增加之间进行权衡。在确定OAC的适用资格时,指南建议使用经过验证的评分(如CHA2DS2-VASc)来计算血栓栓塞事件发生率。相比之下,不建议常规计算出血评分,部分原因是许多与出血风险增加相关的患者因素与缺血性卒中风险的更大幅度增加相关。我们旨在通过配对的卒中和出血风险评分来描述患者特征,以了解一致性水平。

方法

在2010年至2016年期间,我们在心房颤动更佳知情治疗结果登记处(ORBIT-AF)I和II登记处确定了20451例AF患者。我们根据卒中和出血风险配对对患者进行分组:低和高卒中风险(CHA2DS2-VASc<2和≥2),低和高出血风险(ORBIT<4和≥4),并描述了OAC和抗血小板(AP)治疗的使用率。

结果

大多数患者(68.6%)处于高卒中风险和低出血风险。高出血风险患者(19.4%)具有高卒中风险(98.5%)。对于高卒中和出血风险的患者,OAC+AP联合治疗的使用率最高。该组的缺血性和出血性事件也最高。

结论

该队列中几乎所有高出血风险(ORBIT评分≥4)的AF患者都具有高卒中风险(CHA2DS2-VASc≥2),这支持出血风险不应消除卒中预防的必要性。相比之下,大多数高卒中风险患者处于低出血风险(ORBIT<4),这支持大多数患者使用OAC。出血评分,结合明确表明出血风险较高的因素,可能会识别出适合替代卒中预防措施(如左心耳封堵装置)或出血缓解策略(如降低抗血小板治疗强度)的患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验