Hussain Sabah, Brewer Elliot, Tyler Elizabeth
School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
J Affect Disord. 2025 Mar 15;373:133-148. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.12.067. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
Previous research on bipolar disorder (BD) primarily focused on younger adults, with limited research on older adults. This systematic review is the first to investigate how mania and depression are measured in older adults with BD.
The searches were completed in April 2024 using the databases PsycINFO, CINAHL Plus, MEDLINE, and Embase. Fifteen studies with a total of 1041 participants were included. These studies used quantitative measures to assess mania and depression in participants aged 50-98 with BD I or II. The studies' risk of bias was evaluated using the appropriate critical appraisal tools.
The Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) was the most commonly used measure of mania, while the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) and the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) were the most commonly used measures of depression. The pooled analysis revealed that older adult scores on the YMRS were relatively similar to younger cohorts in both euthymic and manic states. Variability in scores was seen across the depression scales.
The review followed rigorous systematic processes. However, in some studies, the participant's mood state was unknown, possibly impacting their pooled scores on the measures.
The findings from the review add to our existing knowledge regarding the presentation of mania and depression in later life. There is still a great disparity in research developed for the older BD population. Large-scale studies are warranted to inform the development of tailored measures and interventions to improve the outcomes for this population.
先前关于双相情感障碍(BD)的研究主要集中在年轻人身上,对老年人的研究有限。本系统评价首次调查了老年双相情感障碍患者中躁狂和抑郁的测量方法。
2024年4月使用PsycINFO、CINAHL Plus、MEDLINE和Embase数据库完成检索。纳入了15项研究,共1041名参与者。这些研究采用定量方法评估年龄在50 - 98岁的双相I型或II型障碍患者的躁狂和抑郁情况。使用适当的批判性评价工具评估研究的偏倚风险。
青年躁狂评定量表(YMRS)是最常用的躁狂测量工具,而流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES - D)和汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HAM - D)是最常用的抑郁测量工具。汇总分析显示,在心境正常和躁狂状态下,老年人YMRS评分与年轻队列相对相似。抑郁量表的评分存在差异。
本综述遵循了严格的系统流程。然而,在一些研究中,参与者的情绪状态未知,这可能会影响他们在测量工具上的汇总得分。
该综述的结果增加了我们对晚年躁狂和抑郁表现的现有认识。针对老年双相情感障碍人群的研究仍存在很大差距。有必要进行大规模研究,为制定针对性的测量方法和干预措施提供依据,以改善该人群的治疗效果。