• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

减少急诊科重复治疗错误的多方面方法。

Multifaceted approach to reduce duplicate therapy errors in the emergency department.

作者信息

Huang Huiling, Sunku Srivatsava, Ong Hui Shan, Chan Jonathan Kim Yang, Sim Guek Gwee

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Changi General Hospital, Singapore

Department of Emergency Medicine, Changi General Hospital, Singapore.

出版信息

BMJ Open Qual. 2024 Dec 20;13(4):e003141. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003141.

DOI:10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003141
PMID:39709192
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11667450/
Abstract

Medication errors continue to pose a significant risk to patient safety, accounting for half of the avoidable harm in healthcare systems around the world. In emergency departments (EDs), factors such as high patient loads and emergent nature of care increase the likelihood of such errors. An audit conducted at the ED of Changi General Hospital Singapore from January 2019 to July 2022 revealed that the duplicate therapy error comprised 31% of all reported medication errors. Therapeutic duplication occurs when the same or pharmacologically equivalent agents are prescribed concurrently to a patient. These errors not only jeopardise patient safety but also place additional strain on healthcare resources and lead to stress among the staff involved.This quality improvement (QI) project aims to reduce duplicate therapy error by 50% 3 months post-intervention at the ED. Beginning in August 2022 and continuing through December 2023, the project followed a structured approach comprising four phases: problem identification, identifying root causes, developing of targeted interventions and ensuring sustainability. Phase 1 involved an audit from January 2019 to July 2022 to determine the extent and types of medication errors in the ED. In phase 2, a root cause analysis (RCA) of the medication error identified key issues such as system knowledge deficits, inadequate IT processes, environment, policies and procedures and gaps in care coordination. Based on these findings, targeted interventions were developed and implemented in phase 3. Phase 4 focused on sustaining improvements through ongoing audits.The QI project successfully met its goal of reducing duplicate therapy error rates by 50% post-intervention. Additionally, it completely eliminated duplicate therapy errors in certain medication categories.In conclusion, through targeted interventions, active engagement of relevant stakeholders and ongoing efforts to sustain and enhance improvement, a safer healthcare environment can be achieved for patients.

摘要

用药错误继续对患者安全构成重大风险,在全球医疗系统中,此类错误占可避免伤害的一半。在急诊科,患者数量多以及护理工作的紧急性质等因素增加了此类错误发生的可能性。对新加坡樟宜综合医院急诊科在2019年1月至2022年7月期间进行的一项审计显示,重复治疗错误占所有报告的用药错误的31%。当同时给患者开具相同或药理学等效的药物时,就会发生治疗重复。这些错误不仅危及患者安全,还会给医疗资源带来额外压力,并导致相关工作人员产生压力。这个质量改进(QI)项目旨在干预后3个月内将急诊科的重复治疗错误减少50%。该项目从2022年8月开始,持续到2023年12月,采用了一种结构化方法,包括四个阶段:问题识别、确定根本原因、制定有针对性的干预措施以及确保可持续性。第一阶段涉及对2019年1月至2022年7月期间的审计,以确定急诊科用药错误的程度和类型。在第二阶段,对用药错误进行根本原因分析(RCA),确定了关键问题,如系统知识不足、信息技术流程不完善、环境、政策和程序以及护理协调方面的差距。基于这些发现,在第三阶段制定并实施了有针对性的干预措施。第四阶段专注于通过持续审计来维持改进。该QI项目成功实现了干预后将重复治疗错误率降低50%的目标。此外,它完全消除了某些药物类别中的重复治疗错误。总之,通过有针对性的干预措施、相关利益攸关方的积极参与以及持续维持和加强改进的努力,可以为患者实现更安全的医疗环境。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d72/11667450/8aa0f3565859/bmjoq-13-4-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d72/11667450/f74ddf134182/bmjoq-13-4-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d72/11667450/49a125aa6c82/bmjoq-13-4-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d72/11667450/8aa0f3565859/bmjoq-13-4-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d72/11667450/f74ddf134182/bmjoq-13-4-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d72/11667450/49a125aa6c82/bmjoq-13-4-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d72/11667450/8aa0f3565859/bmjoq-13-4-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Multifaceted approach to reduce duplicate therapy errors in the emergency department.减少急诊科重复治疗错误的多方面方法。
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 Dec 20;13(4):e003141. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003141.
2
The use of a contextual, modal and psychological classification of medication errors in the emergency department: a retrospective descriptive study.急诊科用药错误的情境、模式及心理分类应用:一项回顾性描述性研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2017 Dec;26(23-24):4335-4343. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13760. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
3
Impact of automated dispensing cabinets on medication selection and preparation error rates in an emergency department: a prospective and direct observational before-and-after study.自动发药柜对急诊科用药选择及调配错误率的影响:一项前瞻性直接观察前后对照研究。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2016 Apr;22(2):156-63. doi: 10.1111/jep.12445. Epub 2015 Sep 7.
4
Professional, structural and organisational interventions in primary care for reducing medication errors.在初级保健中采取专业、结构和组织干预措施以减少用药错误。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 4;10(10):CD003942. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003942.pub3.
5
Reported medication events in a paediatric emergency research network: sharing to improve patient safety.儿科急诊研究网络中的报告用药事件:分享以提高患者安全性。
Emerg Med J. 2013 Oct;30(10):815-9. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2012-201642. Epub 2012 Oct 31.
6
[Medication errors in a hospital emergency department: study of the current situation and critical points for improving patient safety].[医院急诊科的用药错误:现状研究及改善患者安全的关键点]
Emergencias. 2017;29(6):412-415.
7
Medication Error Minimization Scheme (MEMS) in an adult tertiary intensive care unit (ICU) 2009-2011.2009-2011 年成人三级重症监护病房(ICU)中的药物错误最小化方案(MEMS)。
Aust Crit Care. 2013 May;26(2):58-75. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2012.07.003. Epub 2012 Aug 13.
8
Prevalence and contributing factors of intravenous medication administration errors in emergency departments: a prospective observational study.急诊科静脉用药给药错误的发生率及相关因素:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2025 Feb 18;37(1). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzaf012.
9
Root causes behind patient safety incidents in the emergency department and suggestions for improving patient safety - an analysis in a Finnish teaching hospital.急诊科患者安全事件的根本原因及改善患者安全的建议——芬兰教学医院的分析。
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Nov 7;24(1):209. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-01120-9.
10
Improving medication safety and patient care in the emergency department.提高急诊科的用药安全和患者护理水平。
J Emerg Nurs. 2003 Feb;29(1):12-6. doi: 10.1067/men.2003.19.

本文引用的文献

1
Medication errors in emergency departments: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence and severity.急诊科用药错误:系统评价和荟萃分析的患病率和严重程度。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2024 Oct;46(5):1024-1033. doi: 10.1007/s11096-024-01742-w. Epub 2024 May 11.
2
Preventable medication harm across health care settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.在医疗保健环境中可预防的药物伤害:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Med. 2020 Nov 6;18(1):313. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01774-9.
3
Prevalence and characteristics of medication errors at an emergency department of a teaching hospital in Malaysia.
马来西亚一家教学医院急诊科药物错误的发生率和特征。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jan 22;20(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-4921-4.
4
Strategies for reducing medication errors in the emergency department.减少急诊科用药错误的策略。
Open Access Emerg Med. 2014 Jul 23;6:45-55. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S64174. eCollection 2014.
5
Medication errors: an overview for clinicians.药物错误:临床医生须知。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2014 Aug;89(8):1116-25. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.05.007. Epub 2014 Jun 27.
6
Duplicate orders: an unintended consequence of computerized provider/physician order entry (CPOE) implementation: analysis and mitigation strategies.重复医嘱:计算机化医嘱录入系统(CPOE)实施的意外后果:分析与缓解策略。
Appl Clin Inform. 2012 Oct 17;3(4):377-91. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2012-01-RA-0002. Print 2012.