Suppr超能文献

信息通信技术对低收入和中等收入国家免疫接种及免疫规划的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析

The impact of information and communication technology on immunisation and immunisation programmes in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Zarekar Mohini, Al-Shehabi Hussein, Dörner Rita, Weishaar Heide, Lennemann Tessa, El Bcheraoui Charbel, Bernasconi Andrea

机构信息

Evidence-Based Public Health, Centre for International Health Protection, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany; Institute of International Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Evidence-Based Public Health, Centre for International Health Protection, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

EBioMedicine. 2025 Jan;111:105520. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105520. Epub 2024 Dec 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Low-income and Middle-income Countries (LMIC) are continually working to ensure everyone can access life-saving vaccines. Recognising the considerable impact of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in healthcare, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarise ICT effectiveness in improving vaccine delivery in LMICs.

METHODS

A systematic search from January 2010 to August 2023 in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, BMJ Health & Care Informatics, and grey literature was performed. This search focused on randomised controlled trials (RCTs), non-RCTs, observational, and mixed-methods studies in English, examining ICT's effects on childhood immunisation in LMICs. Risk of bias in RCTs and non-RCTs was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute tool, and mixed-methods studies were evaluated with the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. A meta-analysis summarised ICT's impact on third pentavalent dose coverage and full immunisation by age one. The study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023446062).

FINDINGS

Of 6535 screened studies, 27 involving 354,979 children were included. All apart from one study demonstrated a positive impact on immunisation coverage and timeliness, completeness and accuracy of records, number of adverse events reporting, vaccine stockouts, and cold chain expansion. The meta-analysis demonstrated that reminders effectively improved coverage rate of the third dose of the pentavalent vaccine (OR 2.32, 95% CI 1.34-4.03) and the full immunisation at one year of age (OR 2.61, 95% CI 1.2-5.67) with significant degrees of heterogeneity, respectively I 82% and I 89%. Main concerns for bias in RCTs included unblinded outcome assessors and intervention providers. Interpreting quasi-experimental studies was more challenging due to the higher risk of baseline differences between study arms, statistical methods, and dropouts. Mixed-methods studies often lacked clarity in integrating qualitative and quantitative data.

INTERPRETATION

This systematic review confirms the benefits of ICT in immunisation programmes by enhancing various stages of vaccine delivery. Specifically, reminders have been shown to enhance childhood immunisation coverage rates.

FUNDING

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (German Corporation for International Cooperation, GIZ) as part of the Digital Innovation in Pandemic Control (DIPC) Initiative, financed by the Bundesministerium für Wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit (Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development, BMZ).

摘要

背景

低收入和中等收入国家(LMIC)一直在努力确保每个人都能获得挽救生命的疫苗。认识到信息通信技术(ICT)在医疗保健领域的重大影响,我们进行了一项系统综述和荟萃分析,以总结ICT在改善LMIC疫苗接种方面的有效性。

方法

对2010年1月至2023年8月期间在MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆、BMJ健康与护理信息学以及灰色文献中进行了系统检索。该检索集中于英文的随机对照试验(RCT)、非RCT、观察性和混合方法研究,考察ICT对LMIC儿童免疫接种的影响。使用乔安娜·布里格斯研究所工具评估RCT和非RCT中的偏倚风险,并使用混合方法评估工具对混合方法研究进行评估。一项荟萃分析总结了ICT对第三剂五价疫苗覆盖率和一岁时全程免疫的影响。该研究已在PROSPERO(CRD42023446062)注册。

结果

在6535项筛选研究中,纳入了27项涉及354,979名儿童的研究。除一项研究外,所有研究均显示对免疫接种覆盖率、记录的及时性、完整性和准确性、不良事件报告数量、疫苗缺货以及冷链扩展有积极影响。荟萃分析表明,提醒有效地提高了五价疫苗第三剂的覆盖率(OR 2.32,95%CI 1.34 - 4.03)和一岁时的全程免疫覆盖率(OR 2.61,95%CI 1.2 - 5.67),异质性程度分别为I² 82%和I² 89%。RCT中偏倚的主要问题包括结果评估者和干预提供者未设盲。由于研究组之间基线差异、统计方法和失访的风险较高,解释准实验研究更具挑战性。混合方法研究在整合定性和定量数据方面往往缺乏清晰度。

解读

本系统综述证实了ICT在免疫规划中的益处,可通过加强疫苗接种的各个阶段来实现。具体而言,提醒已被证明可提高儿童免疫接种覆盖率。

资金来源

德国国际合作机构(German Corporation for International Cooperation, GIZ)作为大流行控制数字创新(DIPC)倡议的一部分,由德国联邦经济合作部(Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development, BMZ)资助。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c9b/11732194/4ae169951099/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验