Zaganjor Ibrahim, Saelee Ryan, Miyamoto Yoshihisa, Xu Fang, Pavkov Meda E
Division of Diabetes Translation, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Division of Diabetes Translation, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Prim Care Diabetes. 2025 Feb;19(1):40-45. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2024.12.008. Epub 2024 Dec 22.
This study aims to describe pain management technique usage and social functioning limitations among adults with chronic pain by diabetes status.
The 2019 and 2020 National Health Interview Survey data were pooled to complete this analysis. Use of the following techniques in the past 3 months were measured: 1) prescription opioids; 2) physical, rehabilitative, or occupational therapy; 3) talk therapies; 4) chiropractic care; 5) yoga, Tai Chi, or Qi Gong; 6) massage; and 7) relaxation techniques. The social functioning limitations assessed were: 1) doing errands alone; 2) participating in social activities; and 3) work limitations. Weighted prevalence and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated for each outcome by diabetes status. Logistic regression was used to estimate age- and sex-adjusted odds ratios (aORs) to assess differences by diabetes status.
Adults with diabetes and chronic pain were more likely to use prescription opioids (aOR: 1.4; 95 % CI: 1.2, 1.6) but less likely to use various nonpharmacological techniques than those without diabetes. Additionally, adults with diabetes and chronic pain were more likely to report each social functioning limitation than those without diabetes.
Results suggest adults with diabetes and chronic pain may be missing beneficial opportunities to manage pain.
本研究旨在按糖尿病状况描述慢性疼痛成人的疼痛管理技术使用情况和社会功能限制。
汇总2019年和2020年国家健康访谈调查数据以完成本分析。测量过去3个月内以下技术的使用情况:1)处方阿片类药物;2)物理、康复或职业治疗;3)谈话疗法;4)脊椎按摩治疗;5)瑜伽、太极或气功;6)按摩;7)放松技巧。评估的社会功能限制包括:1)独自办事;2)参加社交活动;3)工作限制。按糖尿病状况对每个结果估计加权患病率和95%置信区间(CI)。使用逻辑回归估计年龄和性别调整后的比值比(aOR)以评估糖尿病状况的差异。
患有糖尿病和慢性疼痛的成年人比没有糖尿病的成年人更有可能使用处方阿片类药物(aOR:1.4;95%CI:1.2,1.6),但使用各种非药物技术的可能性较小。此外,患有糖尿病和慢性疼痛的成年人比没有糖尿病的成年人更有可能报告每种社会功能限制。
结果表明,患有糖尿病和慢性疼痛的成年人可能错过了管理疼痛的有益机会。