Suppr超能文献

脂质体布比卡因在第三磨牙阻生拔除术中的应用:创新研究。

Liposomal Bupivacaine Use in Third Molar Impaction Surgery: INNOVATE Study.

作者信息

Lieblich Stuart E, Danesi Hassan

出版信息

Anesth Prog. 2024 Dec 4;71(4):199-207. doi: 10.2344/333161.

Abstract

The analgesic efficacy and safety of liposomal bupivacaine (LB) in third molar extraction was evaluated in this phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of subjects undergoing bilateral third molar extraction. Subjects were randomized 2: 1 to infiltration with LB (133 mg/10 mL) or placebo, and received opioid rescue medication as needed. Primary efficacy measure was cumulative area under the curve (AUC) of numeric rating scale (NRS) pain severity scores through 48 hours (AUC of NRS0-48) postsurgery. Other measures included AUC of NRS0-24, AUC of NRS0-72, and AUC of NRS0-96, and incidence of adverse events. There were 150 subjects in the primary efficacy population (n = 99 LB, n = 51 placebo) and 89 in the per-protocol population (n = 59 LB, n = 30 placebo). Least-squares mean for AUC of NRS0-48 was 172.3 LB versus 194.7 placebo (P = .227) in the primary efficacy population and 120.8 LB versus 183.3 placebo (P = .023) in the per-protocol population. At all time points, between-group differences in AUC of NRS scores were significant in the per-protocol population (LB lower than placebo, P < .05) but not in the primary efficacy population. The adverse event profile was similar between groups. LB produced significantly lower cumulative pain scores versus placebo at all time points in the per-protocol analysis but not in the primary efficacy analysis because of protocol violations. This study indicates significant improvement in pain scores in the third molar model, but because of extensive protocol violations additional studies are warranted to demonstrate effectiveness.

摘要

在这项针对接受双侧第三磨牙拔除术的受试者的3期双盲、安慰剂对照研究中,评估了脂质体布比卡因(LB)在第三磨牙拔除术中的镇痛效果和安全性。受试者按2:1随机分组,分别接受LB(133mg/10mL)浸润或安慰剂浸润,并根据需要接受阿片类急救药物。主要疗效指标是术后48小时数字评分量表(NRS)疼痛严重程度评分的曲线下累积面积(AUC)(NRS0 - 48的AUC)。其他指标包括NRS0 - 24的AUC、NRS0 - 72的AUC、NRS0 - 96的AUC以及不良事件的发生率。主要疗效人群中有150名受试者(n = 99名LB组,n = 51名安慰剂组),符合方案人群中有89名受试者(n = 59名LB组,n = 30名安慰剂组)。在主要疗效人群中,NRS0 - 48的AUC的最小二乘均值为LB组172.3,安慰剂组194.7(P = 0.227);在符合方案人群中,LB组为120.8,安慰剂组为183.3(P = 0.023)。在所有时间点,符合方案人群中NRS评分的AUC组间差异显著(LB组低于安慰剂组,P < 0.05),但在主要疗效人群中差异不显著。两组的不良事件情况相似。在符合方案分析中,LB在所有时间点的累积疼痛评分均显著低于安慰剂,但在主要疗效分析中并非如此,原因是存在方案违背情况。这项研究表明在第三磨牙模型中疼痛评分有显著改善,但由于广泛的方案违背情况,需要进行更多研究来证明其有效性。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

2
Evolving Role of Local Anesthetics in Managing Postsurgical Analgesia.局部麻醉药在术后镇痛管理中的角色演变
Clin Ther. 2015 Jun 1;37(6):1354-71. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.03.017. Epub 2015 Apr 10.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验