Teng Wenqiang, Zhi Hui, Wang Rui, Zhou Min
School of Journalism and Communication, Beijing Normal University.
Health Commun. 2025 Oct;40(11):2191-2199. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2024.2444351. Epub 2024 Dec 23.
When exposed to traumatic events through media coverage, how do we emotionally appraise the situation? Although many factors contribute to our reasoning about media vicarious traumatization, in this article we focus on the role of metaphorical frames. This study uses an online survey experiment ( = 280 CHN adults) to investigate how irrational beliefs influence the effects of metaphorical frames on media vicarious traumatization, with a focus on the mediating role of transportation. The findings revealed that journey metaphors increased media vicarious traumatization more than war metaphors in conditions of low irrational beliefs, while no significant difference was observed in conditions of high irrational beliefs. The interaction between metaphorical frames and irrational beliefs indirectly affected media vicarious traumatization through transportation. These results improve our understanding of the framing effects of cancer metaphors and suggest practical strategies for media health coverage.
当通过媒体报道接触到创伤性事件时,我们如何从情感上评估这种情况?尽管有许多因素影响我们对媒体替代性创伤的推理,但在本文中,我们重点关注隐喻框架的作用。本研究采用在线调查实验(N = 280名中国成年人)来探究非理性信念如何影响隐喻框架对媒体替代性创伤的作用,重点关注沉浸感的中介作用。研究结果显示,在非理性信念较低的情况下,旅程隐喻比战争隐喻更能增加媒体替代性创伤,而在非理性信念较高的情况下,未观察到显著差异。隐喻框架与非理性信念之间的交互作用通过沉浸感间接影响媒体替代性创伤。这些结果增进了我们对癌症隐喻框架效应的理解,并为媒体健康报道提供了实用策略。