Robert Sophia, Granovetter Michael C, Ling Shouyu, Behrmann Marlene
Department of Psychology and Neuroscience Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh PA.
School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
bioRxiv. 2024 Dec 12:2024.12.06.627251. doi: 10.1101/2024.12.06.627251.
The neural processes underlying attentional processing are typically lateralized in adults, with spatial attention associated with the right hemisphere (RH) and object-based attention with the left hemisphere (LH). Using a modified two-rectangle attention paradigm, we compared the lateralization profiles of individuals with childhood hemispherectomy (either LH or RH) and age-matched, typically developing controls. Although patients exhibited slower reaction times (RTs) compared to controls, both groups benefited from valid attentional cueing. However, patients experienced significantly higher costs for invalid trials-reflected by larger RT differences between validly and invalidly cued targets. This was true for invalid trials on both cued and uncued objects, probes of object- and space-based attentional processes, respectively. Notably, controls showed no significant RT cost differences between invalidly cued locations on cued versus uncued objects. By contrast, patients exhibited greater RT costs for targets on uncued versus cued objects, suggesting greater difficulty shifting attention across objects. We explore potential explanations for this group difference and the lack of difference between patients with LH or RH resection. These findings enhance our understanding of spatial and object-based attention in typical development and reveal how significant neural injury affects the development of attentional systems in the LH and RH.
在成年人中,注意力加工背后的神经过程通常是偏侧化的,空间注意力与右半球(RH)相关,基于物体的注意力与左半球(LH)相关。我们使用改良的双矩形注意力范式,比较了儿童期接受半球切除术(左半球或右半球)的个体与年龄匹配的正常发育对照组的偏侧化特征。尽管与对照组相比,患者的反应时间(RTs)较慢,但两组都从有效的注意力提示中受益。然而,患者在无效试验中的代价显著更高——这体现在有效提示和无效提示目标之间更大的反应时间差异上。这对于提示和未提示物体上的无效试验都是如此,分别是基于物体和空间的注意力过程的探测。值得注意的是,对照组在提示物体与未提示物体上的无效提示位置之间没有显著的反应时间代价差异。相比之下,患者在未提示物体上的目标比在提示物体上的目标表现出更大的反应时间代价,这表明跨物体转移注意力的难度更大。我们探讨了这种组间差异以及左半球或右半球切除患者之间缺乏差异的潜在解释。这些发现增进了我们对正常发育中基于空间和物体的注意力的理解,并揭示了严重的神经损伤如何影响左半球和右半球注意力系统的发育。