• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

参与“改善护理综合支付-高级项目”的医院参与者中的医疗和外科诊疗事件

Medical and Surgical Episodes Among Hospital Participants in the Bundled Payments for Care Improvement-Advanced Program.

作者信息

Robbins Keenan J, Zheng Jie, Waken R J, Orav E John, Epstein Arnold M, Joynt Maddox Karen E

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.

Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Dec 2;7(12):e2451792. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.51792.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.51792
PMID:39714840
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11667361/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Hospital participation in the Bundled Payments for Care Improvement-Advanced (BPCI-A) initiative has been associated with modest savings and stable clinical outcomes overall, but it is unknown whether the program performs differently for medical and surgical or procedural (henceforth, surgical) episodes.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the association of BPCI-A participation with Medicare spending and clinical outcomes for medical and surgical episodes.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective difference-in-differences cohort study utilized 100% Medicare fee-for-service inpatient claims for episodes initiated between January 1, 2017, and September 30, 2019, and included 90 days of follow-up. The setting was hospitals participating in BPCI-A and matched nonparticipant hospitals. Participants included Medicare beneficiaries admitted for medical or surgical episodes.

EXPOSURE

BPCI-A participation, beginning in 2018.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Changes in 90-day Medicare payments and clinical outcomes (readmissions, mortality, healthy days at home).

RESULTS

The final sample included 2 895 878 episodes; 1 618 172 (55.9%) were female, 324 186 (11.2%) people under age 65 years, 1 354 246 (46.8%) between 65 and 80 years of age, and 1 217 446 (42.0%) over 80 years of age. Patient characteristics at BPCI-A and comparison hospitals were similar. BPCI-A participation was associated with a decrease in payments for medical episodes (-$882 per episode; 95% CI -$1004 to -$760) and surgical episodes (-$587; 95% CI -$850 to -$324) compared with nonparticipant hospitals (absolute difference between change in medical and surgical episodes, -$295; 95% CI -$584 to -$5). BPCI-A participation was associated with a greater increase in healthy days at home and a greater decrease in both skilled nursing facility (SNF) admissions and SNF length of stay overall, but there were no significant differences between medical and surgical episodes in terms of the association of BPCI-A with changes in these outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cohort study analyzing the outcomes of the BPCI-A program for medical and surgical episodes, BPCI-A participation was associated with modestly decreased payments for both medical and surgical episodes compared with nonparticipants. Improvements in clinical outcomes associated with BPCI-A participation were also modest for both types of episodes; this study does not support a hypothesis that either medical or surgical episodes are better-suited for episode-based payments.

摘要

重要性

医院参与“改善护理综合支付 - 高级版”(BPCI - A)计划总体上与适度的成本节约和稳定的临床结果相关,但该计划在医疗和外科或程序性(以下简称外科)病例中的表现是否不同尚不清楚。

目的

评估参与BPCI - A计划与医疗保险支出以及医疗和外科病例临床结果之间的关联。

设计、设置和参与者:这项回顾性差异队列研究利用了2017年1月1日至2019年9月30日期间启动的100%医疗保险按服务收费住院索赔,并进行了90天的随访。研究对象为参与BPCI - A计划的医院和匹配的非参与医院。参与者包括因医疗或外科病例入院的医疗保险受益人。

暴露因素

从2018年开始参与BPCI - A计划。

主要结局和衡量指标

90天医疗保险支付的变化以及临床结果(再入院、死亡率、在家健康天数)。

结果

最终样本包括2895878例病例;其中1618172例(55.9%)为女性,324186例(11.2%)年龄在65岁以下,1354246例(46.8%)年龄在65至80岁之间,1217446例(42.0%)年龄在80岁以上。BPCI - A计划参与医院和对照医院的患者特征相似。与非参与医院相比,参与BPCI - A计划与医疗病例支付减少(每例 - 882美元;95%置信区间 - 1004至 - 760美元)和外科病例支付减少( - 587美元;95%置信区间 - 850至 - 324美元)相关(医疗和外科病例支付变化的绝对差异为 - 295美元;95%置信区间 - 584至 - 5美元)。参与BPCI - A计划与在家健康天数的增加幅度更大以及熟练护理机构(SNF)入院和SNF总体住院时间的减少幅度更大相关,但在BPCI - A计划与这些结果变化的关联方面,医疗和外科病例之间没有显著差异。

结论与相关性

在这项分析BPCI - A计划在医疗和外科病例中结果的队列研究中,与未参与者相比,参与BPCI - A计划与医疗和外科病例支付适度减少相关。对于这两种类型的病例,参与BPCI - A计划相关的临床结果改善也较为适度;本研究不支持医疗或外科病例更适合按病例支付的假设。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c96/11667361/6c477e2d5b5d/jamanetwopen-e2451792-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c96/11667361/9c1516b2ff59/jamanetwopen-e2451792-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c96/11667361/6c477e2d5b5d/jamanetwopen-e2451792-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c96/11667361/9c1516b2ff59/jamanetwopen-e2451792-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c96/11667361/6c477e2d5b5d/jamanetwopen-e2451792-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Medical and Surgical Episodes Among Hospital Participants in the Bundled Payments for Care Improvement-Advanced Program.参与“改善护理综合支付-高级项目”的医院参与者中的医疗和外科诊疗事件
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Dec 2;7(12):e2451792. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.51792.
2
Savings Associated With Bundled Payments for Outpatient Spine Surgery Among Medicare Beneficiaries.医疗保险受益人门诊脊柱手术捆绑支付相关的节省费用情况。
JAMA Health Forum. 2025 Jul 3;6(7):e251907. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.1907.
3
Association of Hospitals' Experience with Bundled Payment for Care Improvement Model with the Diffusion of Acute Hospital Care at Home.医院参与护理改善捆绑支付模式与急性住院医疗居家扩散的关联。
Health Serv Res. 2024 Aug;59(4):e14302. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14302. Epub 2024 Mar 30.
4
Are Quality Scores in the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services Merit-based Incentive Payment System Associated With Outcomes After Outpatient Orthopaedic Surgery?医疗补助与医疗照顾服务中心基于绩效的激励支付系统中的质量评分与门诊骨科手术后的结果相关吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jul 1;482(7):1107-1116. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003033. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
5
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
6
Association Between Hospital Participation in a Medicare Bundled Payment Initiative and Payments and Quality Outcomes for Lower Extremity Joint Replacement Episodes.医院参与医疗保险捆绑支付计划与下肢关节置换事件的支付及质量结果之间的关联。
JAMA. 2016 Sep 27;316(12):1267-78. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.12717.
7
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
8
Elective THA for Indications Other Than Osteoarthritis Is Associated With Increased Cost and Resource Use: A Medicare Database Study of 135,194 Claims.择期全髋关节置换术用于治疗非骨关节炎的适应证与更高的成本和资源利用相关:一项基于 Medicare 数据库的 135194 例患者的研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jul 1;482(7):1159-1170. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002922. Epub 2023 Nov 24.
9
The Comprehensive Primary Care Plus Model and Health Care Spending, Service Use, and Quality.《综合初级保健加模式与医疗保健支出、服务利用和质量》
JAMA. 2024 Jan 9;331(2):132-146. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.24712.
10
High Risk of Readmission After THA Regardless of Functional Status in Patients Discharged to Skilled Nursing Facility.入住专业护理机构的患者,无论功能状态如何,全髋关节置换术后再入院风险均高。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jul 1;482(7):1185-1192. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002950. Epub 2024 Jan 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Savings Associated With Bundled Payments for Outpatient Spine Surgery Among Medicare Beneficiaries.医疗保险受益人门诊脊柱手术捆绑支付相关的节省费用情况。
JAMA Health Forum. 2025 Jul 3;6(7):e251907. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.1907.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing the validity of race and ethnicity coding in administrative Medicare data for reporting outcomes among Medicare advantage beneficiaries from 2015 to 2017.评估 2015 年至 2017 年期间医疗保险优势受益人的行政医疗保险数据中种族和民族编码在报告结果方面的有效性。
Health Serv Res. 2023 Oct;58(5):1045-1055. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14197. Epub 2023 Jun 25.
2
Succeeding in Medicare's newest bundled payment program: Results from teaching hospitals.在医疗保险最新的捆绑式支付计划中取得成功:教学医院的结果。
Healthc (Amst). 2023 Mar;11(1):100672. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2022.100672. Epub 2022 Dec 29.
3
Medicare's Bundled Payments For Care Improvement Advanced Model: Impact On High-Risk Beneficiaries.
医疗保险的改善护理捆绑支付高级模式:对高风险受益人的影响。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2022 Nov;41(11):1661-1669. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2022.00138.
4
Year 1 of the Bundled Payments for Care Improvement-Advanced Model.支付方式改革-按疾病诊断相关分组(DRGs)付费三年行动计划第一年。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Aug 12;385(7):618-627. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa2033678.
5
Predictors of Success in the Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Program.支付改善计划捆绑包中成功的预测因素。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Feb;37(3):513-520. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06820-7. Epub 2021 May 4.
6
Impact of Medicare's Bundled Payments Initiative on Patient Selection, Payments, and Outcomes for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.医疗保险捆绑支付计划对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和冠状动脉旁路移植术的患者选择、支付和结果的影响。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020 Sep;13(9):e006171. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.006171. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
7
Spending and quality after three years of Medicare's bundled payments for medical conditions: quasi-experimental difference-in-differences study.医保捆绑付费政策实施三年后对医疗状况的支出和质量的影响:准实验双重差分研究。
BMJ. 2020 Jun 17;369:m1780. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1780.
8
Spending And Quality After Three Years Of Medicare's Voluntary Bundled Payment For Joint Replacement Surgery.医保自愿捆绑支付关节置换手术三年后的支出和质量。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Jan;39(1):58-66. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00466.
9
Healthy Days at home: A novel population-based outcome measure.居家健康天数:一种新颖的基于人群的结局衡量指标。
Healthc (Amst). 2020 Mar;8(1):100378. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2019.100378. Epub 2019 Nov 8.
10
How Do Frail Medicare Beneficiaries Fare Under Bundled Payments?衰弱的 Medicare 受益人在捆绑支付下表现如何?
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Nov;67(11):2245-2253. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16147. Epub 2019 Sep 6.