Suppr超能文献

低收入人群的家访及常规与紧急产后护理的使用:一项随机临床试验的二次分析

Home Visits and the Use of Routine and Emergency Postpartum Care Among Low-Income People: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

作者信息

Rokicki Slawa, Oviedo Dea, Perreault Nicolas, Zera Chloe, McGregor Alecia J, Bates Mary Ann, Zhou R Annetta, Baicker Katherine, McConnell Margaret A

机构信息

Department of Health Behavior, Society, and Policy, Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, New Jersey.

Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Dec 2;7(12):e2451605. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.51605.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Access to appropriate postpartum care is essential for improving maternal health outcomes and promoting maternal health equity.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the impact of the Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP) home visiting program on use of routine and emergency postpartum care.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This study was a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial that enrolled eligible participants between 2016 and 2020 to receive NFP or usual care from a South Carolina Medicaid program. Participants were nulliparous pregnant individuals at less than 28 weeks' gestation at enrollment who were enrolled in Medicaid during pregnancy or delivery. Analysis was performed February 2, 2023, to July 16, 2024.

INTERVENTION

Participants were enrolled in a 2:1 ratio to receive NFP, an established model of nurse home visiting, or usual care. NFP visits are conducted prenatally and for up to 2 years post partum.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

This study assessed one of the trial's preregistered secondary outcomes: attendance at a routine postpartum health care visit before 12 weeks post partum. Other exploratory outcomes included outpatient care use, hospitalization, and emergent, nonemergent, and any use of emergency department (ED) health services at 12 weeks and 1 year post partum. Subgroup analyses examined individuals who underwent cesarean delivery, had chronic disease, experienced pregnancy complications, reported non-Hispanic Black race and ethnicity, were socially vulnerable, or were unaffected by COVID-19.

RESULTS

Among 5670 participants enrolled, 4877 were analyzed (median [IQR] age, 21 [19-25] years), including 3261 who received NFP and 1616 who received usual care. By race and ethnicity, the sample included 259 Hispanic individuals (5.7%); 56 non-Hispanic Asian, Indigenous, or Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander individuals (1.2%); 2535 non-Hispanic Black individuals (55.4%); 1587 non-Hispanic White individuals (34.7%); and 141 individuals (3.1%) with more than 1 race reported (and non-Hispanic ethnicity). There was no significant difference in attendance of routine postpartum visit at 12 weeks between NFP and usual care groups (63.8% vs 64.2%; adjusted difference [AD] -0.3 [95% CI, -3.2 to 2.5] percentage points). In exploratory analyses, the NFP group was less likely to have a visit to the ED without admission (AD, -2.5 [95% CI, -4.8 to -0.1] percentage points) in the first 12 weeks post partum. Other outcomes, including hospitalizations, outpatient visits, and emergent and nonemergent ED visits, were not different between intervention and control groups. There were also no statistically significant differences within subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial of nulliparous pregnant individuals with low income, nurse home visiting did not increase use of routine postpartum care in the immediate or extended postpartum periods, even among those with greater health challenges. Nurse home visiting was associated with reduced ED use. More research is needed on how to improve continuity of perinatal care for low-income populations.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03360539.

摘要

重要性

获得适当的产后护理对于改善孕产妇健康结局和促进孕产妇健康公平至关重要。

目的

分析护士-家庭伙伴关系(NFP)家访计划对常规和紧急产后护理使用情况的影响。

设计、设置和参与者:本研究是一项对随机临床试验的二次分析,该试验在2016年至2020年期间招募符合条件的参与者,以接受南卡罗来纳医疗补助计划提供的NFP或常规护理。参与者为入组时妊娠少于28周的初产妇,在孕期或分娩期间参加了医疗补助计划。分析于2023年2月2日至2024年7月16日进行。

干预措施

参与者按2:1的比例入组,接受NFP(一种成熟的护士家访模式)或常规护理。NFP家访在产前进行,产后持续2年。

主要结局和测量指标

本研究评估了该试验预先注册的次要结局之一:产后12周内进行常规产后保健访视的情况。其他探索性结局包括门诊护理使用情况、住院情况以及产后12周和1年时急诊、非急诊和任何急诊部门(ED)医疗服务的使用情况。亚组分析考察了接受剖宫产、患有慢性病、经历妊娠并发症、报告为非西班牙裔黑人种族和族裔、社会脆弱或未受新冠疫情影响的个体。

结果

在入组的5670名参与者中,对4877人进行了分析(年龄中位数[四分位间距]为21[19 - 25]岁),其中3261人接受NFP,1616人接受常规护理。按种族和族裔划分,样本包括259名西班牙裔个体(5.7%);56名非西班牙裔亚洲、原住民或夏威夷原住民及太平洋岛民个体(1.2%);2535名非西班牙裔黑人个体(55.4%);1587名非西班牙裔白人个体(34.7%);以及141名报告有不止一种种族(且为非西班牙裔族裔)的个体(3.1%)。NFP组和常规护理组在产后12周进行常规产后访视的情况无显著差异(63.8%对64.2%;调整差异[AD] -0.3[95%置信区间,-3.2至2.5]个百分点)。在探索性分析中,NFP组在产后前12周内未经住院而前往急诊部门就诊的可能性较小(AD,-2.5[95%置信区间,-4.8至-0.1]个百分点)。其他结局,包括住院、门诊就诊以及急诊和非急诊急诊就诊,干预组和对照组之间无差异。亚组内也无统计学显著差异。

结论与相关性

在这项对低收入初产妇随机临床试验的二次分析中,护士家访在产后即刻或延长产后期间并未增加常规产后护理的使用,即使在那些健康挑战更大的人群中也是如此。护士家访与急诊部门使用减少相关。需要更多关于如何改善低收入人群围产期护理连续性的研究。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT03360539。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f1c/11667346/7351d4f4620b/jamanetwopen-e2451605-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验