Yonemoto Naohiro, Dowswell Therese, Nagai Shuko, Mori Rintaro
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Translational Medical Center, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, 4-1-1 Ogawahigashimachi, Kodaira, Tokyo, Japan, 187-8553.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 2;8(8):CD009326. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009326.pub3.
Maternal complications including psychological and mental health problems and neonatal morbidity have been commonly observed in the postpartum period. Home visits by health professionals or lay supporters in the weeks following the birth may prevent health problems from becoming chronic with long-term effects on women, their babies, and their families.
To assess outcomes for women and babies of different home-visiting schedules during the early postpartum period. The review focuses on the frequency of home visits, the duration (when visits ended) and intensity, and on different types of home-visiting interventions.
We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (28 January 2013) and reference lists of retrieved articles.
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) (including cluster-RCTs) comparing different types of home-visiting interventions enrolling participants in the early postpartum period (up to 42 days after birth). We excluded studies in which women were enrolled and received an intervention during the antenatal period (even if the intervention continued into the postnatal period) and studies recruiting only women from specific high-risk groups. (e.g. women with alcohol or drug problems).
Study eligibility was assessed by at least two review authors. Data extraction and assessment of risk of bias were carried out independently by at least two review authors. Data were entered into Review Manager software.
We included data from 12 randomised trials with data for more than 11,000 women. The trials were carried out in countries across the world, and in both high- and low-resource settings. In low-resource settings women receiving usual care may have received no additional postnatal care after early hospital discharge.The interventions and control conditions varied considerably across studies with trials focusing on three broad types of comparisons: schedules involving more versus fewer postnatal home visits (five studies), schedules involving different models of care (three studies), and home versus hospital clinic postnatal check-ups (four studies). In all but two of the included studies, postnatal care at home was delivered by healthcare professionals. The aim of all interventions was broadly to assess the wellbeing of mothers and babies, and to provide education and support, although some interventions had more specific aims such as to encourage breastfeeding, or to provide practical support.For most of our outcomes only one or two studies provided data, and overall results were inconsistent.There was no evidence that home visits were associated with improvements in maternal and neonatal mortality, and no consistent evidence that more postnatal visits at home were associated with improvements in maternal health. More intensive schedules of home visits did not appear to improve maternal psychological health and results from two studies suggested that women receiving more visits had higher mean depression scores. The reason for this finding was not clear. In a cluster randomised trial comparing usual care with individualised care by midwives extended up to three months after the birth, the proportions of women with Edinburgh postnatal depression scale (EPDS) scores ≥ 13 at four months was reduced in the individualised care group (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.86). There was some evidence that postnatal care at home may reduce infant health service utilisation in the weeks following the birth, and that more home visits may encourage more women to exclusively breastfeed their babies. There was some evidence that home visits are associated with increased maternal satisfaction with postnatal care.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Increasing the number of postnatal home visits may promote infant health and maternal satisfaction and more individualised care may improve outcomes for women, although overall findings in different studies were not consistent. The frequency, timing, duration and intensity of such postnatal care visits should be based upon local and individual needs. Further well designed RCTs evaluating this complex intervention will be required to formulate the optimal package.
产后常见包括心理和心理健康问题在内的孕产妇并发症以及新生儿发病情况。在分娩后的几周内,由卫生专业人员或非专业支持者进行家访,可能会防止健康问题演变为慢性病,从而对女性及其婴儿和家庭产生长期影响。
评估产后早期不同家访计划对女性和婴儿的影响。本综述重点关注家访的频率、持续时间(家访结束时间)和强度,以及不同类型的家访干预措施。
我们检索了Cochrane妊娠与分娩组试验注册库(2013年1月28日)以及检索到的文章的参考文献列表。
随机对照试验(RCTs)(包括整群RCTs),比较不同类型的家访干预措施,纳入产后早期(出生后42天内)的参与者。我们排除了女性在孕期入组并接受干预的研究(即使干预持续到产后),以及仅招募特定高危组女性的研究(例如有酒精或药物问题的女性)。
研究的纳入由至少两名综述作者进行评估。数据提取和偏倚风险评估由至少两名综述作者独立进行。数据录入Review Manager软件。
我们纳入了12项随机试验的数据,涉及超过11000名女性。这些试验在世界各国进行,包括高资源和低资源环境。在低资源环境中,接受常规护理的女性在早期出院后可能没有接受额外的产后护理。不同研究中的干预措施和对照条件差异很大,试验主要集中在三种广泛的比较类型:产后家访次数多与少的计划(五项研究)、涉及不同护理模式的计划(三项研究)以及在家与在医院诊所进行产后检查(四项研究)。在除两项纳入研究之外的所有研究中,在家进行的产后护理由卫生保健专业人员提供。所有干预措施的目的大致都是评估母亲和婴儿的健康状况,并提供教育和支持,尽管有些干预措施有更具体的目标,如鼓励母乳喂养或提供实际支持。对于我们的大多数结局指标,只有一两项研究提供了数据,总体结果并不一致。没有证据表明家访与孕产妇和新生儿死亡率的改善相关,也没有一致的证据表明更多的产后家访与孕产妇健康的改善相关。更密集的家访计划似乎并未改善孕产妇的心理健康,两项研究的结果表明,接受更多家访的女性平均抑郁评分更高。这一发现的原因尚不清楚。在一项整群随机试验中,比较常规护理与由助产士提供的长达产后三个月的个体化护理,个体化护理组在四个月时爱丁堡产后抑郁量表(EPDS)评分≥13的女性比例降低(RR 0.68,95%CI 0.53至0.86)。有一些证据表明,产后在家护理可能会降低出生后几周内婴儿的医疗服务利用率,而且更多的家访可能会鼓励更多女性纯母乳喂养婴儿。有一些证据表明,家访与孕产妇对产后护理的满意度提高相关。
增加产后家访次数可能会促进婴儿健康和孕产妇满意度,更个体化的护理可能会改善女性的结局,尽管不同研究的总体结果并不一致。此类产后护理家访的频率、时间、持续时间和强度应基于当地和个人需求。需要进一步设计良好的随机对照试验来评估这种复杂干预措施,以制定最佳方案。