• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超声引导下衰减参数诊断肝脂肪变性的准确性

Accuracy of Ultrasound-Guided Attenuation Parameter for Diagnosing Hepatic Steatosis.

作者信息

Yagobian Shiva D, Dasyam Navya, Minervini Marta, Tublin Mitchell, Behari Jaideep, Furlan Alessandro

机构信息

University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.

UPMC Department of Radiology, Pittsburgh, PA.

出版信息

Ultrasound Q. 2024 Dec 23;41(1). doi: 10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000702. eCollection 2025 Mar 1.

DOI:10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000702
PMID:39715185
Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of a new noninvasive imaging technique, ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter (UGAP), in diagnosing hepatic steatosis. This single-center retrospective study included 81 UGAP studies performed to guide therapy between July 2022 and June 2023 at a large academic medical center. Patients with either liver biopsy or Magnetic resonance-based proton-density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) within 12 months of US-UGAP imaging, irrespective of order, were included. Patient demographics, body mass index, liver function tests, UGAP values, MRI-PDFF values, and liver biopsy results were obtained from a review of the medical records. Presence of steatosis was defined as PDFF >5.2% or >5% of hepatocytes with steatosis at pathology. Area under the ROC curve (AUROC) was used to measure UGAP accuracy for the detection of hepatic steatosis with statistical significance P < 0.05. There was a significant positive correlation between UGAP and MRI-PDFF (r = 0.463; P < 0.001; confidence interval [CI]: 0.220;0.651). The AUROC to differentiate absence of steatosis (n = 21) from presence of steatosis (n = 32) for UGAP with MRI as the gold standard was 0.760 (P < 0.001; CI: 0.623;0.867). A UGAP value >0.66 had 78% sensitivity and 67% specificity to identify steatosis presence on MRI-PDFF. The AUROC to differentiate absence of steatosis (n = 11) from presence of steatosis (n = 21) for UGAP with pathology as the gold standard was 0.894 (P < 0.001; CI: 0.734;0.974). A UGAP value >0.57 had 100% sensitivity and 64% specificity to identify steatosis presence at pathology. UGAP is an accurate measure for detecting the presence of hepatic steatosis and may be a noninvasive method for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease diagnosis and follow-up.

摘要

本研究的目的是调查一种新的非侵入性成像技术——超声引导衰减参数(UGAP)在诊断肝脂肪变性方面的诊断准确性。这项单中心回顾性研究纳入了2022年7月至2023年6月期间在一家大型学术医疗中心进行的81项用于指导治疗的UGAP研究。纳入在US-UGAP成像后12个月内进行肝活检或基于磁共振的质子密度脂肪分数(MRI-PDFF)检查的患者,检查顺序不限。通过查阅病历获取患者的人口统计学信息、体重指数、肝功能检查结果、UGAP值、MRI-PDFF值和肝活检结果。脂肪变性的存在定义为PDFF>5.2%或病理检查时脂肪变性的肝细胞>5%。采用ROC曲线下面积(AUROC)来衡量UGAP检测肝脂肪变性的准确性,统计学显著性P<0.05。UGAP与MRI-PDFF之间存在显著正相关(r=0.463;P<0.001;置信区间[CI]:0.220;0.651)。以MRI为金标准,UGAP区分无脂肪变性(n=21)和有脂肪变性(n=32)的AUROC为0.760(P<0.001;CI:0.623;0.867)。UGAP值>0.66时,识别MRI-PDFF上脂肪变性存在的灵敏度为78%,特异度为67%。以病理为金标准,UGAP区分无脂肪变性(n=11)和有脂肪变性(n=21)的AUROC为0.894(P<0.001;CI:0.734;0.974)。UGAP值>0.57时,识别病理检查时脂肪变性存在的灵敏度为100%,特异度为64%。UGAP是检测肝脂肪变性存在的一种准确方法,可能是一种用于代谢功能障碍相关脂肪性肝病诊断和随访的非侵入性方法。

相似文献

1
Accuracy of Ultrasound-Guided Attenuation Parameter for Diagnosing Hepatic Steatosis.超声引导下衰减参数诊断肝脂肪变性的准确性
Ultrasound Q. 2024 Dec 23;41(1). doi: 10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000702. eCollection 2025 Mar 1.
2
Utility of Ultrasound-Guided Attenuation Parameter for Grading Steatosis With Reference to MRI-PDFF in a Large Cohort.超声引导衰减参数在大样本中的 MRI-PDFF 对脂肪变性分级的效用。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Nov;20(11):2533-2541.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.11.003. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
3
Utility of Attenuation Coefficient Measurement Using an Ultrasound-Guided Attenuation Parameter for Evaluation of Hepatic Steatosis: Comparison With MRI-Determined Proton Density Fat Fraction.超声引导衰减参数测量在评估肝脂肪变性中的应用:与 MRI 测定质子密度脂肪分数的比较
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 Feb;212(2):332-341. doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.20123. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
4
Performance of ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter and 2D shear wave elastography in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease.超声引导下衰减参数和二维剪切波弹性成像在代谢功能障碍相关脂肪性肝病患者中的应用
Eur Radiol. 2025 Apr;35(4):2339-2350. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-11076-w. Epub 2024 Oct 7.
5
Ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter for identifying metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: a prospective study.超声引导下衰减参数用于识别代谢功能障碍相关脂肪性肝病:一项前瞻性研究。
Ultrasonography. 2025 Mar;44(2):134-144. doi: 10.14366/usg.24204. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
6
Diagnostic performance of a novel ultrasound-based quantitative method to assess liver steatosis in histologically identified nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.一种基于超声的新型定量方法在组织学确诊的非酒精性脂肪性肝病中评估肝脏脂肪变性的诊断性能。
Med Ultrason. 2023 Mar 30;25(1):7-13. doi: 10.11152/mu-3815. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
7
Altered probe pressure and body position increase diagnostic accuracy for men and women in detecting hepatic steatosis using quantitative ultrasound.改变探头压力和体位可提高定量超声检测男性和女性肝脂肪变性的诊断准确性。
Eur Radiol. 2024 Sep;34(9):5989-5999. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-10655-1. Epub 2024 Mar 8.
8
Accuracy of Controlled Attenuation Parameter for Liver Steatosis in High-Risk Patients for MASLD Using MRI-Proton Density Fat Fraction as Reference Standard.以MRI质子密度脂肪分数为参考标准,评估磁共振控制衰减参数对代谢功能障碍相关脂肪性肝病高危患者肝脂肪变性的诊断准确性。
Dig Dis Sci. 2025 Feb;70(2):814-824. doi: 10.1007/s10620-024-08799-7. Epub 2024 Dec 21.
9
Reproducibility of ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter (UGAP) to the noninvasive evaluation of hepatic steatosis.超声引导衰减参数(UGAP)在无创性评估肝脂肪变性中的可重复性。
Sci Rep. 2022 Feb 21;12(1):2876. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-06879-0.
10
Intra-individual Comparisons of the Ultrasound-Guided Attenuation Parameter and the Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Proton Density Fat Fraction Using Bias and Precision Statistics.基于偏倚和精度统计的超声引导衰减参数与磁共振成像质子密度脂肪分数的个体内比较。
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2022 Aug;48(8):1537-1546. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2022.03.019. Epub 2022 May 22.