Garg Heena, Narayanan M R Vishnu, Khanna Puneet, Yalla Bharat
From the Department of Anaesthesiology, Pain Medicine, and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.
Anesth Analg. 2024 Dec 1;139(6):1144-1155. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000007156. Epub 2024 Nov 15.
A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to compare phenylephrine boluses versus prophylactic infusion in parturients undergoing cesarean delivery under spinal or combined spinal-epidural anesthesia on feto-maternal outcomes.
Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and US Clinical registry databases were searched. Studies comparing phenylephrine boluses (both therapeutic and prophylactic) with infusion (both fixed- and variable-rate) assessing various feto-maternal outcomes were included. The primary outcome was the incidence of maternal hypotension. Secondary maternal outcomes included the incidence of reactive hypertension, bradycardia, nausea, or vomiting; secondary neonatal outcomes included umbilical arterial pH, partial pressure of oxygen (paO2), umbilical venous pH, fetal acidosis, Apgar Scores at 1 and 5 minutes. All outcomes were quantitatively analyzed using the random effects model. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration R0B 2.0 tool.
We included 15 studies with 2153 parturients. The parturients receiving phenylephrine bolus during cesarean delivery under spinal or combined spinal-epidural anesthesia had a significant increase in the incidence of predelivery hypotension compared to phenylephrine infusion (risk ratio [RR], 2.34, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.72-3.18). Reactive hypertension (RR, 0.48, 95% CI, 0.29-0.79) and bradycardia (RR, 0.57, 95% CI, 0.41-0.79) were less common in the parturients receiving phenylephrine bolus; whereas, vomiting (RR, 2.15, 95% CI, 1.53-3.03) was more common compared to the infusion group. No statistically significant difference was observed in the incidence of nausea or any fetal outcomes (umbilical artery pH, paO2, umbilical venous pH, fetal acidosis, and Apgar scores at 1 and 5 minutes) between either of the groups. Three studies had a high risk of bias.
A prophylactic phenylephrine infusion significantly reduces the incidence of predelivery hypotension in parturients undergoing cesarean delivery under neuraxial anesthesia in comparison to the therapeutic or prophylactic phenylephrine bolus group. A prophylactic phenylephrine infusion may be considered in all parturients without preexisting hypertensive disorder or cardiovascular disorders to reduce the risk of predelivery hypotension. More evidence is needed to guide optimal hemodynamic management for patients with hypertensive or cardiovascular disorders.
进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以比较在脊髓或腰麻-硬膜外联合麻醉下行剖宫产的产妇中,使用去氧肾上腺素推注与预防性输注对母婴结局的影响。
检索了Medline、Embase、Cochrane和美国临床注册数据库。纳入比较去氧肾上腺素推注(治疗性和预防性)与输注(固定速率和可变速率)并评估各种母婴结局的研究。主要结局是产妇低血压的发生率。次要产妇结局包括反应性高血压、心动过缓、恶心或呕吐的发生率;次要新生儿结局包括脐动脉pH值、氧分压(paO2)、脐静脉pH值、胎儿酸中毒、1分钟和5分钟时的阿氏评分。所有结局均使用随机效应模型进行定量分析。使用Cochrane协作网R0B 2.0工具评估偏倚风险。
我们纳入了15项研究,共2153名产妇。与去氧肾上腺素输注相比,在脊髓或腰麻-硬膜外联合麻醉下行剖宫产时接受去氧肾上腺素推注的产妇,分娩前低血压的发生率显著增加(风险比[RR],2.34,95%置信区间[CI],1.72-3.18)。接受去氧肾上腺素推注的产妇中,反应性高血压(RR,0.48,95%CI,0.29-0.79)和心动过缓(RR,0.57,95%CI,0.41-0.79)较少见;而与输注组相比,呕吐(RR,2.15,95%CI,1.53-3.03)更常见。两组之间在恶心发生率或任何胎儿结局(脐动脉pH值、paO2、脐静脉pH值、胎儿酸中毒以及1分钟和5分钟时的阿氏评分)方面均未观察到统计学显著差异。三项研究存在高偏倚风险。
与治疗性或预防性去氧肾上腺素推注组相比,预防性去氧肾上腺素输注可显著降低在神经轴麻醉下行剖宫产的产妇分娩前低血压的发生率。对于所有无既往高血压疾病或心血管疾病的产妇,可考虑预防性输注去氧肾上腺素以降低分娩前低血压的风险。对于患有高血压或心血管疾病的患者,需要更多证据来指导最佳的血流动力学管理。