Cui Guangxia, Guo Yu, Bai Wenpei
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China,
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Oncology. 2025;103(7):644-654. doi: 10.1159/000542952. Epub 2024 Dec 23.
Appropriately stratifying the risk of adnexal masses is of great importance. Many diagnostic algorithms have been devised, most of which rely on ultrasound features. However, some remote areas lack trained sonographers. This study aimed to develop an alternative model to distinguish between malignant and benign adnexal masses in resource-constrained settings using clinical information rather than ultrasound data.
The study included women diagnosed with an adnexal tumor and scheduled for surgery between 2020 and 2023. Participants were divided into two groups based on histopathology reports: those with malignant adnexal masses and those with benign ones. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify independent predictors of adnexal mass malignancy. The training set yielded a nomogram model, which was then validated in the validation set. The model's effectiveness was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC), calibration, and clinical decision curve analysis (DCA) curves.
We randomly assigned 550 participants to the training and the validation sets in an 8:2 ratio. Logistic regression analyses identified age (OR = 1.044, p = 0.003), abdominal distension (OR = 0.139, p < 0.001), serum CA125 (OR = 1.007, p < 0.001), and serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) (OR = 1.291, p = 0.004) as independent risk factors for predicting malignant adnexal tumors. A nomogram was constructed using these factors. The ROC curve showed an area under the curve of 0.846 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.783, 0.908) in the training set and 0.817 (95% CI: 0.668, 0.966) in the validation set. The calibration curve showed good consistency between model predictions and actual outcomes. The DCA curve demonstrated a considerable clinical advantage afforded by the model.
The logistic regression model can aid gynecologists - particularly those in areas with limited access to skilled sonographers - in identifying patients at high risk and implementing appropriate management strategies.
对附件包块的风险进行恰当分层至关重要。已经设计了许多诊断算法,其中大多数依赖超声特征。然而,一些偏远地区缺乏训练有素的超声检查人员。本研究旨在开发一种替代模型,以便在资源有限的情况下利用临床信息而非超声数据来区分附件包块的良恶性。
该研究纳入了2020年至2023年间被诊断为附件肿瘤并计划接受手术的女性。根据组织病理学报告将参与者分为两组:附件包块为恶性的和附件包块为良性的。采用单因素和多因素逻辑回归分析来确定附件包块恶性的独立预测因素。训练集产生了一个列线图模型,然后在验证集中进行验证。使用受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线、校准曲线和临床决策曲线分析(DCA)曲线对模型的有效性进行评估。
我们以8:2的比例将550名参与者随机分配到训练集和验证集。逻辑回归分析确定年龄(OR = 1.044,p = 0.003)、腹胀(OR = 0.139,p < 0.001)、血清CA125(OR = 1.007,p < 0.001)和血清癌胚抗原(CEA)(OR = 1.291,p = 0.004)为预测附件恶性肿瘤的独立危险因素。利用这些因素构建了一个列线图。ROC曲线显示训练集中曲线下面积为0.846(95%置信区间[CI]:0.783,0.908),验证集中为0.817(95%CI:0.668,0.966)。校准曲线显示模型预测与实际结果之间具有良好的一致性。DCA曲线表明该模型具有相当大的临床优势。
逻辑回归模型可以帮助妇科医生——尤其是那些所在地区难以获得熟练超声检查人员的医生——识别高危患者并实施适当的管理策略。