Suppr超能文献

使用序贯常温区域灌注与常温机器灌注或仅用常温区域灌注的心脏死亡后供体肝移植与静态冷保存的效果比较

Outcomes of DCD Liver Transplant Using Sequential Normothermic Regional Perfusion and Normothermic Machine Perfusion or NRP Alone Versus Static Cold Storage.

作者信息

Croome Kristopher P, Subramanian Vijay, Mathur Amit K, Aqel Bashar, Mao Shennen A, Clendenon Jacob N, Perry Dana K, Dhanireddy Kiran, Taner C Burcin

机构信息

Department of Transplant, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL.

Transplant Institute, Tampa General Hospital, Tampa, FL.

出版信息

Transplantation. 2024 Dec 24. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000005301.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The availability of in situ normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) or ex situ normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) has revolutionized donation after circulatory death (DCD) liver transplant (LT). While some have suggested that NRP and NMP may represent competing technologies for DCD LT, there are many scenarios where these technologies can function in a complementary manner.

METHODS

Between January 2022 and March 2024, 83 DCD LTs were performed using NRP (62 NRP alone and 21 NRP + NMP) and were compared with 297 static cold storage (SCS) DCD LTs. NRP + NMP was used in scenarios with (1) long travel distances, (2) complicated transplant recipients, or (c) the need for additional liver graft recovery in "marginal" cases.

RESULTS

Ischemic cholangiopathy was lower in the NRP alone group (0%) and the NRP + NMP group (0%) compared with the SCS group (16.8; P < 0.001 and P = 0.04, respectively). In addition, early allograft dysfunction, number of packed red blood cells transfused, and acute kidney injury were lower in the NRP alone and NRP + NMP groups compared with the SCS group. Graft survival was higher in cases where NRP was used than in cases where SCS was used (P = 0.016). In all the cases where lactate remained elevated at the end of NRP (mean 8.2 ± 2.0), it ultimately normalized at the end of NMP (0.92 ± 0.56).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study demonstrates lower rates of ischemic cholangiopathy and improved graft survival with NRP alone or NRP + NMP compared with SCS when using liver grafts from DCD donors. It also demonstrates that excellent outcomes can be achieved with sequential NRP + NMP in cases with prolonged travel distances, complicated recipients, or when there is a need for additional liver recovery in "marginal" cases.

摘要

背景

原位常温区域灌注(NRP)或体外常温机器灌注(NMP)技术的出现彻底改变了心脏死亡后器官捐献(DCD)肝移植(LT)的现状。虽然有人认为NRP和NMP可能是DCD肝移植相互竞争的技术,但在很多情况下,这些技术可以互补发挥作用。

方法

在2022年1月至2024年3月期间,采用NRP进行了83例DCD肝移植手术(62例单纯NRP和21例NRP+NMP),并与297例静态冷藏(SCS)DCD肝移植进行比较。NRP+NMP用于以下情况:(1)运输距离长;(2)移植受者情况复杂;或(3)在“边缘”病例中需要额外获取肝移植物。

结果

与SCS组相比,单纯NRP组(0%)和NRP+NMP组(0%)的缺血性胆管病发生率更低(分别为16.8%;P<0.001和P=0.04)。此外,与SCS组相比,单纯NRP组和NRP+NMP组的早期移植物功能障碍、输注的红细胞压积数量和急性肾损伤发生率更低。使用NRP的病例的移植物存活率高于使用SCS的病例(P=0.016)。在所有NRP结束时乳酸仍升高的病例中(平均8.2±2.0),最终在NMP结束时恢复正常(0.92±0.56)。

结论

本研究表明,与使用DCD供体肝移植物的SCS相比,单纯NRP或NRP+NMP的缺血性胆管病发生率更低,移植物存活率更高。研究还表明,在运输距离长、受者情况复杂或“边缘”病例需要额外获取肝脏的情况下,序贯使用NRP+NMP可取得良好的效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验