Pipeleers Lissa, Unterrainer Christian, Emonds Marie-Paule, Wissing Karl Martin, Tran Thuong Hien
Department of Nephrology and Arterial Hypertension, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium; Kidney diseases, Dialysis & Transplantation Research Unit (NIER), Vitality Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.
Institute of Immunology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Am J Transplant. 2024 Dec 22. doi: 10.1016/j.ajt.2024.12.014.
Repeat human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatches (RMM) have been historically associated with an increased risk of graft loss after repeat kidney transplantation, in particular HLA-DR RMM in sensitized recipients. As routine use of sensitive assays can at present prevent the transplantation of RMM in hosts with donor-specific antibodies, we hypothesized that RMM would no longer be associated with graft loss. We performed a registry analysis of the Collaborative Transplant Study database including 6711 patients who received a second kidney transplant (KT) between 2010 and 2021, with at least 1 HLA-A, HLA-B, or HLA-DR mismatch. No increased risk for graft loss was observed for the second KT with a class I RMM, regardless of sensitization status. For the second KT with a HLA-DR RMM, the hazard ratio for graft loss in the first year after transplantation was 1.61 (95% CI 1.16-2.23; P = .004) compared to recipients without an RMM and increased to 2.21 (95% CI 1.24-3.63: P = .002) in sensitized recipients (latest complement-dependent cytotoxicity panel reactive antibodies >0%). Our observations suggest that class I RMM do not need to be systematically avoided. In contrast, HLA-DR RMM still had a negative impact on graft survival in this contemporary cohort, despite the widespread availability of Luminex.
重复人类白细胞抗原(HLA)错配(RMM)在历史上一直与再次肾移植后移植物丢失风险增加相关,尤其是致敏受者中的HLA-DR RMM。由于目前常规使用敏感检测方法可防止将RMM移植给具有供体特异性抗体的宿主,我们推测RMM将不再与移植物丢失相关。我们对协作移植研究数据库进行了一项登记分析,该数据库包括2010年至2021年间接受第二次肾移植(KT)的6711例患者,这些患者至少存在1个HLA-A、HLA-B或HLA-DR错配。无论致敏状态如何,对于具有I类RMM的第二次KT,未观察到移植物丢失风险增加。对于具有HLA-DR RMM的第二次KT,与无RMM的受者相比,移植后第一年移植物丢失的风险比为1.61(95%CI 1.16-2.23;P = 0.004),在致敏受者(最新补体依赖细胞毒性试验反应性抗体>0%)中增加至2.21(95%CI 1.24-3.63:P = 0.002)。我们的观察结果表明,I类RMM无需系统地避免。相比之下,尽管Luminex检测方法已广泛应用,但在这个当代队列中,HLA-DR RMM对移植物存活仍有负面影响。