Lee Hyun Jin, Yang Yun-Jung, Yoo Sung Goo, Jeon Eun-Ju
Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Convergence Science, International St. Mary's Hospital, Catholic Kwandong University College of Medicine, Gangneung, Korea.
Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2025 May;18(2):134-142. doi: 10.21053/ceo.2024.00296. Epub 2024 Dec 24.
Lateral canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (LC-BPPV) is diagnosed using the head roll test (HRT), which involves rotating the head to mobilize particles within the lateral canal, inducing nystagmus. The body roll test (BRT) is conducted by rolling both the body and head simultaneously, offering the advantage of safely achieving the correct rotational angle in both directions. This study evaluates the diagnostic utility of the BRT.
A randomized controlled study was conducted. In total, 43 patients with LC-BPPV symptoms were enrolled and randomly divided into two groups. In group A (n=21), the HRT was administered first, followed by the BRT after a 5-minute interval. In contrast, group B (n=22) received the BRT first, followed by the HRT after 5 minutes. Participants wore Fresnel glasses, which allowed for the observation of nystagmus in sitting, bowing, and lying down positions. We recorded the direction, latency, and duration of the nystagmus.
The distribution of nystagmus types was 18:25 (geotropic: apogeotropic). There was no significant difference in age, sex, or type of nystagmus between the two groups. The findings from the HRT aligned with those from the BRT for 32 (74.4%) of the participants. No statistical differences were noted in the diagnosis of the affected side or in the type of nystagmus (geotropic vs. apogeotropic) between the HRT (n=32) and BRT (n=32) (P>0.05). The diagnostic rates in the first (n=31) and second tests (n=33) were similar, showing no significant difference and consistent results regarding the type of LC-BPPV. Additionally, there were no significant differences in postural discomfort and pain scores between these groups.
BRT and HRT demonstrate comparable diagnostic efficacy for LC-BPPV. BRT offers a viable alternative, especially for patients whose conditions preclude the use of HRT, and may improve diagnostic accuracy when combined with HRT.
外侧半规管良性阵发性位置性眩晕(LC-BPPV)通过摇头试验(HRT)进行诊断,该试验包括转动头部以移动外侧半规管内的耳石颗粒,诱发眼震。身体翻滚试验(BRT)是通过同时翻滚身体和头部来进行的,其优点是能安全地在两个方向上达到正确的旋转角度。本研究评估了BRT的诊断效用。
进行了一项随机对照研究。总共招募了43例有LC-BPPV症状的患者,并随机分为两组。A组(n = 21)先进行HRT,5分钟后进行BRT。相比之下,B组(n = 22)先进行BRT,5分钟后进行HRT。参与者佩戴菲涅耳眼镜,以便在坐位、低头位和卧位观察眼震。我们记录了眼震的方向、潜伏期和持续时间。
眼震类型的分布为18:25(地向性:背地向性)。两组之间在年龄、性别或眼震类型方面无显著差异。32名(74.4%)参与者的HRT结果与BRT结果一致。HRT(n = 32)和BRT(n = 32)在患侧诊断或眼震类型(地向性与背地向性)方面无统计学差异(P>0.05)。第一次试验(n = 31)和第二次试验(n = 33)的诊断率相似,在LC-BPPV类型方面无显著差异且结果一致。此外,这些组之间在姿势不适和疼痛评分方面无显著差异。
BRT和HRT对LC-BPPV具有相当的诊断效能。BRT提供了一种可行的替代方法,特别是对于那些病情不适合使用HRT的患者,并且与HRT联合使用时可能提高诊断准确性。