Zhao Li, Ren Yuanyuan, Qin Donghui, Yang Xue, Chen Zhuo, Zhang Na
Department of Cardiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Qiqihar Medical College, Qiqihar, 161000, People's Republic of China.
General Hospital, Qiqihar City Second Hospital, Qiqihar, People's Republic of China.
Int J Gen Med. 2024 Dec 19;17:6367-6376. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S496996. eCollection 2024.
To retrospectively compare the efficacy of Sacubitril/Valsartan and Benazepril in the treatment of heart failure in patients following acute myocardial infarction.
A retrospective analysis of clinical data was conducted for 103 patients with heart failure following acute myocardial infarction admitted to our hospital from January 2021 to January 2024. All patients met complete inclusion and exclusion criteria. Based on the treatment interventions received, they were divided into a control group (n=51) and an observation group (n=52). All patients received percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and conventional drug treatment upon admission. The control group received additional treatment with benazepril, while the observation group received Sacubitril/Valsartan on top of the baseline treatment. A comparison was made between the two groups in terms of clinical treatment outcomes, cardiac function indicators [left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV), left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDD), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)], levels of inflammatory markers [high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6)], N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), incidence of adverse reactions, major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), and 6-minute walking distance (6MWD).
No patients were lost to follow-up. After six months of treatment, the observation group demonstrated significantly greater improvements in left ventricular function parameters (LVESV, LVEDD, and LVEF) and reductions in inflammatory markers (hs-CRP, IL-6) and NT-proBNP levels compared to the control group (P < 0.05). The observation group also had a significantly lower incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) (11.54% vs 31.37%, P < 0.05) and a greater improvement in 6-minute walking distance (P < 0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions was comparable between the two groups (P > 0.05).
Sacubitril/Valsartan is a safe and effective treatment for heart failure post-AMI, offering significant improvements in cardiac function, inflammatory response, exercise capacity, and a reduction in MACE risk.
回顾性比较沙库巴曲缬沙坦与贝那普利治疗急性心肌梗死后心力衰竭患者的疗效。
对2021年1月至2024年1月我院收治的103例急性心肌梗死后心力衰竭患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析。所有患者均符合完整的纳入和排除标准。根据接受的治疗干预措施,将他们分为对照组(n = 51)和观察组(n = 52)。所有患者入院时均接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)和常规药物治疗。对照组额外接受贝那普利治疗,而观察组在基线治疗基础上接受沙库巴曲缬沙坦治疗。比较两组的临床治疗效果、心功能指标[左心室收缩末期容积(LVESV)、左心室舒张末期容积(LVEDD)、左心室射血分数(LVEF)]、炎症标志物水平[高敏C反应蛋白(hs-CRP)、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)]、N末端B型利钠肽原(NT-proBNP)、不良反应发生率、主要不良心血管事件(MACE)及6分钟步行距离(6MWD)。
无患者失访。治疗6个月后,与对照组相比,观察组左心室功能参数(LVESV、LVEDD和LVEF)改善更显著,炎症标志物(hs-CRP、IL-6)及NT-proBNP水平降低更明显(P < 0.05)。观察组主要不良心血管事件(MACE)发生率也显著更低(11.54% 对31.37%,P < 0.05),6分钟步行距离改善更明显(P < 0.05)。两组不良反应发生率相当(P > 0.05)。
沙库巴曲缬沙坦是治疗急性心肌梗死后心力衰竭的一种安全有效的药物,能显著改善心功能、炎症反应、运动能力,并降低MACE风险。