Suppr超能文献

极早产儿生理性与基于时间的脐带结扎(ABC3):一项平行组、多中心、随机、对照优势试验。

Physiological versus time based cord clamping in very preterm infants (ABC3): a parallel-group, multicentre, randomised, controlled superiority trial.

作者信息

Knol Ronny, Brouwer Emma, van den Akker Thomas, DeKoninck Philip L J, Onland Wes, Vermeulen Marijn J, de Boode Willem P, van Kaam Anton H, Lopriore Enrico, Reiss Irwin K M, Hutten G Jeroen, Prins Sandra A, Mulder Estelle E M, d'Haens Esther J, Hulzebos Christian V, Bouma Helene A, van Sambeeck Sam J, Niemarkt Hendrik J, van der Putten Mayke E, Lebon Tinta, Zonnenberg Inge A, Nuytemans Debbie H, Willemsen Sten P, Polglase Graeme R, Steggerda Sylke J, Hooper Stuart B, Te Pas Arjan B

机构信息

Division of Neonatology, Department of Neonatal and Pediatric Intensive Care, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2024 Dec 4;48:101146. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101146. eCollection 2025 Jan.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Physiological-based cord clamping (PBCC) in preterm infants is beneficial for cardiovascular transition at birth and may optimize placental transfusion. Whether PBCC can improve clinical outcomes is unknown. The aim of the Aeration, Breathing, Clamping (ABC3) trial was to test whether PBCC results in improved intact survival in very preterm infants.

METHODS

The ABC3 trial was a parallel-group, multicentre, randomised, controlled superiority clinical trial conducted in all Dutch tertiary referral centers for perinatal care involving infants born before 30 weeks of gestation. Infants were randomised to either PBCC or time-based delayed cord clamping (TBCC), stratified by gestational age and treatment center. Infants receiving PBCC were stabilised with umbilical cord intact, which was clamped after reaching cardiorespiratory stability (heart rate >100 bpm and SpO2 >85% while supplemental oxygen <40%). In TBCC the cord was clamped after 30-60 s. The primary outcome was survival without major cerebral injury and/or necrotizing enterocolitis. The primary and key secondary analyses were done in both the intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03808051).

FINDINGS

From January 25, 2019, through October 2, 2022, 669 infants were randomised (median gestational age 27 weeks (IQR 26-28)) and included in the intention-to-treat population. Intact survival occurred in 241 of 339 infants (71.1%) after PBCC, compared with 223 of 330 (67.6%) after TBCC (odds ratio 1.18, 95% CI 0.84-1.66; absolute risk difference 3.1 %points, 95% CI -11.0 to 15.8, p = 0.33). Pre-specified subgroup analysis showed 69.9% intact survival in male infants after PBCC, compared with 61.8% after TBCC (odds ratio 2.32, 95% CI 1.42-3.78, p for interaction 0.026). Secondary outcomes showed fewer red blood cell transfusions after PBCC (rate ratio 0.83, 95% CI 0.75-0.92, p = 0.0003), lower incidence of late-onset sepsis (27.4% versus 33.3%, odds ratio 0.77, 95% CI 0.62-0.95, p = 0.013) and lower admission temperature (36.3 °C versus 36.7 °C, mean difference -0.5, 95% CI -0.8 to -0.3, p < 0.0001). Parents were less anxious (Likert scale 1.52 (SD 0.97) versus 2.23 (SD 1.35); p < 0.001) and more content (Likert scale 4.74 (SD 0.75) versus 4.49 (SD 0.97); p < 0.001) after PBCC.

INTERPRETATION

PBCC in very preterm infants did not increase survival without major cerebral injury or necrotizing enterocolitis compared to TBCC in the entire cohort. A possible beneficial effect in male infants requires confirmation from other trials. PBCC was safe to perform and parents reported more contentment and less anxiety.

FUNDING

The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development.

摘要

背景

对早产儿采用基于生理学的脐带结扎(PBCC)有利于出生时的心血管过渡,可能会优化胎盘输血。PBCC是否能改善临床结局尚不清楚。通气、呼吸、结扎(ABC3)试验的目的是测试PBCC是否能提高极早产儿的完整存活率。

方法

ABC3试验是一项平行组、多中心、随机、对照的优效性临床试验,在荷兰所有围产期护理三级转诊中心进行,涉及妊娠30周前出生的婴儿。婴儿按胎龄和治疗中心分层,随机分为PBCC组或基于时间的延迟脐带结扎(TBCC)组。接受PBCC的婴儿在脐带完整的情况下保持稳定,在达到心肺稳定(心率>100次/分钟且经皮血氧饱和度>85%,同时吸氧<40%)后结扎脐带。在TBCC组中,脐带在30 - 60秒后结扎。主要结局是无重大脑损伤和/或坏死性小肠结肠炎的存活情况。在意向性治疗人群和符合方案人群中进行了主要和关键的次要分析。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册(NCT03808051)。

结果

从2019年1月25日至2022年10月2日,669名婴儿被随机分组(中位胎龄27周(四分位间距26 - 28周))并纳入意向性治疗人群。PBCC组339名婴儿中有241名(71.1%)存活且无重大脑损伤,TBCC组330名婴儿中有223名(67.6%)存活(优势比1.18,95%置信区间0.84 - 1.66;绝对风险差异3.1个百分点,95%置信区间 - 11.0至15.8,p = 0.33)。预先设定的亚组分析显示,PBCC组男婴的完整存活率为69.9%,TBCC组为61.8%(优势比2.32,95%置信区间1.42 - 3.78,交互作用p值为0.026)。次要结局显示,PBCC组的红细胞输注次数较少(率比0.83,95%置信区间0.75 - 0.92,p = 0.0003),晚发性败血症的发生率较低(27.4%对33.3%,优势比0.77,95%置信区间0.62 - 0.95,p = 0.013),入院时体温较低(36.3℃对36.7℃,平均差异 - 0.5,95%置信区间 - 0.8至 - 0.3,p < 0.0001)。PBCC后父母的焦虑程度较低(李克特量表评分1.52(标准差0.97)对2.23(标准差1.35);p < 0.001)且满意度较高(李克特量表评分4.74(标准差0.75)对4.49(标准差0.97);p < 0.001)。

解读

与TBCC相比,在整个队列中,极早产儿采用PBCC并未增加无重大脑损伤或坏死性小肠结肠炎的存活率。对男婴可能存在的有益效果需要其他试验进行证实。PBCC操作安全,父母报告的满意度更高且焦虑程度更低。

资助

荷兰卫生研究与发展组织。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a569/11664066/1bbaa953e3f5/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验