Bircher N, Safar P
Crit Care Med. 1985 Mar;13(3):185-90. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198503000-00009.
Thirty-two dogs subjected to 4 min of ventricular fibrillation were equally divided into four treatment groups: (a) immediate defibrillation (control); or 30 min of (b) standard CPR (SCPR), (c) simultaneous ventilation-compression CPR (SVC-CPR), or (d) open-chest CPR (OCCPR). After 30 min of CPR, restoration of spontaneous circulation was attempted using drug therapy and countershocks and the animals maintained for 24 h or until refractory hypotension occurred. During CPR, OCCPR yielded higher mean arterial and lower central venous pressures than either external method. Circulation was restored in all control dogs, and by 24 h they had nearly normal neurologic deficit scores. In the SCPR group, the heart was restarted in six dogs. Five of these dogs had severe neurologic damage and did not survive 24 h. The animal that survived 24 h, however, was nearly normal neurologically. Although circulation was restored in five SVC-CPR dogs, all were brain-dead and none survived 24 h. In the OCCPR group, seven animals survived 24 h and their neurologic deficit scores were not significantly different from control values. We conclude that OCCPR is greatly superior to SCPR and SVC-CPR with respect to preservation of the brain during resuscitation.
32只经历4分钟心室颤动的狗被平均分为四个治疗组:(a) 立即除颤(对照组);或进行30分钟的 (b) 标准心肺复苏(SCPR)、(c) 同步通气-按压心肺复苏(SVC-CPR)或 (d) 开胸心肺复苏(OCCPR)。在进行30分钟的心肺复苏后,尝试使用药物治疗和除颤恢复自主循环,并将动物维持24小时或直至出现顽固性低血压。在心肺复苏过程中,与任何一种外部方法相比,OCCPR产生的平均动脉压更高,中心静脉压更低。所有对照犬均恢复了循环,到24小时时,它们的神经功能缺损评分几乎正常。在SCPR组中,6只狗的心脏恢复跳动。其中5只狗有严重的神经损伤,未存活24小时。然而,存活24小时的那只狗神经功能几乎正常。尽管5只接受SVC-CPR的狗恢复了循环,但均脑死亡,无一存活24小时。在OCCPR组中,7只动物存活了24小时,它们的神经功能缺损评分与对照值无显著差异。我们得出结论,在复苏过程中,就脑保护而言,OCCPR大大优于SCPR和SVC-CPR。