• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过基于BIM的资产信息建模(AIM)提升埃塞俄比亚公共建筑建筑资产管理中的战略决策:模糊层次分析法分析

Enhancing strategic decision-making in built asset management through BIM-Enabled asset information modelling (AIM) for public buildings in Ethiopia: A fuzzy-AHP analysis.

作者信息

Desbalo Muluken Tilahun, Woldesenbet Asregedew Kassa

机构信息

Construction Engineering and Management, Bauhaus Universität Weimar, Weimar, Germany.

Chair of Construction Management, Ethiopian Institute of Architecture Building Construction and City Development (EiABC), Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2024 Nov 29;10(23):e40824. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40824. eCollection 2024 Dec 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40824
PMID:39717569
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11665313/
Abstract

BIM-Enabled Asset Information Modelling (AIM) entails incorporating extensive data, known as big data, into digital platforms for informed decision-making. However, the lack of accurate and reliable data and the immaturity of BIM integration in existing buildings lead to operational phase performance inefficiencies due to inadequate data access. A strategic approach using BIM-enabled AIM is proposed to address these challenges, with the goal of enhancing data accessibility and adequacy for the operational team's performance. This study aims to develop a framework of information requirements that supports operational strategic decisions in asset portfolio management. To develop the framework, we employed a methodology that combines the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) a structured technique for organizing and analysing complex decisions with fuzzy logic, which helps handle uncertainty in experts' judgments. A comprehensive questionnaire based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) methodology was developed to gather expert insights on prioritizing information requirements, and it was administered to 11 experts selected for their diverse expertise in problem area. Cost, risk, and business value as selection criteria, while technical, managerial, financial, legal, and commercial categories of information are considered as alternatives in the AHP hierarchy. Utilizing the described methodology, fuzzy-AHP analysis revealed distinct variations in information requirements across the strategic decisions of maintain/keep, improve/adapt, and deconstruct/disassemble. For decisions on whether to maintain/keep buildings, the primary information requirement is managerial (39.6 %), followed by legal (20.7 %) and commercial (20 %), guiding strategic decisions. In contrast, improve/adapt decisions prioritize technical information (39 %), with financial (15.5 %) and legal (13.5 %) considerations also being significant. For the deconstruct/disassemble decisions, technical information requirements are most critical (55.5 %), followed by legal (16.6 %) and commercial (12.8 %) information. The findings highlight the need for tailored data generation strategies in existing buildings to address specific decision requirements, aiding in planning and resource allocation towards efficient AIM. The primary limitation of this study is its reliance on a small pool of 11 experts, which may limit the generalizability of the findings. Future research should aim to broaden the expert base to enhance the applicability and robustness of the results.

摘要

基于建筑信息模型(BIM)的资产信息模型(AIM)需要将大量数据(即大数据)整合到数字平台中,以便做出明智的决策。然而,现有建筑中缺乏准确可靠的数据以及BIM集成的不成熟,导致由于数据获取不足而在运营阶段出现效率低下的情况。本文提出了一种使用基于BIM的AIM的战略方法来应对这些挑战,目标是提高数据的可访问性和充分性,以提升运营团队的绩效。本研究旨在开发一个信息需求框架,以支持资产组合管理中的运营战略决策。为了开发该框架,我们采用了一种方法,将层次分析法(AHP)(一种用于组织和分析复杂决策的结构化技术)与模糊逻辑相结合,这有助于处理专家判断中的不确定性。基于层次分析法(AHP)方法开发了一份综合问卷,以收集专家对信息需求优先级的见解,并将其发放给11位因其在问题领域的不同专业知识而被选中的专家。成本、风险和商业价值作为选择标准,而技术、管理、财务、法律和商业类别的信息则被视为AHP层次结构中的备选方案。利用所描述的方法,模糊层次分析法分析揭示了在维护/保留、改进/适应和解构/拆卸等战略决策中信息需求的明显差异。对于是否维护/保留建筑物的决策,主要信息需求是管理方面的(39.6%),其次是法律方面的(20.7%)和商业方面的(20%),这些信息指导着战略决策。相比之下,改进/适应决策优先考虑技术信息(39%),财务(15.5%)和法律(13.5%)方面的考虑也很重要。对于解构/拆卸决策,技术信息需求最为关键(55.5%),其次是法律(16.6%)和商业(12.8%)信息。研究结果强调,需要在现有建筑中制定量身定制的数据生成策略,以满足特定的决策要求,有助于为高效的AIM进行规划和资源分配。本研究的主要局限性在于其依赖于11位专家的小样本,这可能会限制研究结果的普遍性。未来的研究应旨在扩大专家群体以提高结果的适用性和稳健性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d02/11665313/a34ef95281af/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d02/11665313/15bfd01a3d4f/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d02/11665313/1affc6a37e7d/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d02/11665313/1bf24dfd41db/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d02/11665313/a34ef95281af/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d02/11665313/15bfd01a3d4f/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d02/11665313/1affc6a37e7d/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d02/11665313/1bf24dfd41db/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d02/11665313/a34ef95281af/gr4.jpg

相似文献

1
Enhancing strategic decision-making in built asset management through BIM-Enabled asset information modelling (AIM) for public buildings in Ethiopia: A fuzzy-AHP analysis.通过基于BIM的资产信息建模(AIM)提升埃塞俄比亚公共建筑建筑资产管理中的战略决策:模糊层次分析法分析
Heliyon. 2024 Nov 29;10(23):e40824. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40824. eCollection 2024 Dec 15.
2
BIM-enabled built-asset information management conceptual framework: A case of public university buildings in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.基于建筑信息模型的建筑资产信息管理概念框架:以埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴的公立大学建筑为例。
Heliyon. 2024 Jun 13;10(12):e33026. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33026. eCollection 2024 Jun 30.
3
Sustainability decision-making in poultry slaughterhouses: A comparative analysis of AHP and fuzzy AHP.家禽屠宰场的可持续性决策:层次分析法(AHP)与模糊层次分析法(fuzzy AHP)的比较分析
MethodsX. 2025 Jan 29;14:103193. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2025.103193. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
An Integrated Approach of Fuzzy Linguistic Preference Based AHP and Fuzzy COPRAS for Machine Tool Evaluation.一种基于模糊语言偏好的层次分析法和模糊COPRAS的机床评估集成方法。
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 14;10(9):e0133599. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133599. eCollection 2015.
5
Comparison of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TODIM methods for landfill location selection.模糊层次分析法与模糊TODIM法在垃圾填埋场选址中的比较
Springerplus. 2016 Apr 22;5:501. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-2131-7. eCollection 2016.
6
A two-stage model of the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and the fuzzy synthetic evaluation technique to prioritize sustainable sanitation services under uncertainty.一种用于在不确定性下对可持续卫生服务进行优先级排序的模糊层次分析法和模糊综合评价技术的两阶段模型。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 30;15(1):3736. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-88236-5.
7
A Framework to Prioritize the Public Expectations from Water Treatment Plants based on Trapezoidal Type-2 Fuzzy Ahp Method.基于梯形型 2 模糊层次分析法的优先考虑公众对水处理厂期望的框架。
Environ Manage. 2021 Mar;67(3):439-448. doi: 10.1007/s00267-020-01367-5. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
8
A Multicriteria Decision-Making Framework for Access Point Selection in Hybrid LiFi/WiFi Networks Using Integrated AHP-VIKOR Technique.基于层次分析法-逼近理想解排序法集成技术的混合可见光通信/无线局域网接入点选择的多准则决策框架。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Jan 23;23(3):1312. doi: 10.3390/s23031312.
9
Data set for the generation of strategies in the selection of renewable energies in Colombia: Evaluation of AHP and FAHP from regional potentials towards a sustainable future.哥伦比亚可再生能源选择策略生成的数据集:从区域潜力评估层次分析法和模糊层次分析法迈向可持续未来
Data Brief. 2025 Feb 4;59:111348. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2025.111348. eCollection 2025 Apr.
10
An experimental comparison of fuzzy logic and analytic hierarchy process for medical decision support systems.模糊逻辑与层次分析法在医学决策支持系统中的实验比较。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2011 Jul;103(1):10-27. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2010.06.003. Epub 2010 Jul 15.

本文引用的文献

1
BIM-enabled built-asset information management conceptual framework: A case of public university buildings in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.基于建筑信息模型的建筑资产信息管理概念框架:以埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴的公立大学建筑为例。
Heliyon. 2024 Jun 13;10(12):e33026. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33026. eCollection 2024 Jun 30.
2
Multiattribute decision-making under Fermatean fuzzy bipolar soft framework.费马模糊双极软框架下的多属性决策
Granul Comput. 2022;7(2):337-352. doi: 10.1007/s41066-021-00270-6. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
3
Hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute decision making based on binary connection number of set pair analysis.
基于集对分析二元联系数的犹豫模糊多属性决策
Soft comput. 2021;25(23):14797-14807. doi: 10.1007/s00500-021-06215-0. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
4
A definition framework for building adaptation projects.构建适应项目的定义框架。
Sustain Cities Soc. 2020 Dec;63:102345. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102345. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
5
Effective University Facility Management Plan Proposal Reflecting the Needs of the Main Users.反映主要用户需求的有效大学设施管理计划提案
Front Psychol. 2020 Feb 18;11:219. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00219. eCollection 2020.