Suppr超能文献

类风湿关节炎患者亚组的持续无改善病情抗风湿药缓解:两项早期关节炎前瞻性队列分析

Sustained DMARD-free remission in subgroups of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: an analysis of two prospective cohorts with early arthritis.

作者信息

Heutz Judith W, de Jong Pascal H P, Verstappen Marloes, van der Helm-van Mil Annette H M, van Mulligen Elise

机构信息

Department of Rheumatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Department of Rheumatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

出版信息

Lancet Rheumatol. 2025 Apr;7(4):e252-e260. doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(24)00234-0. Epub 2024 Dec 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

About 20% of patients with rheumatoid arthritis on disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) can reach sustained DMARD-free remission. Nonetheless, the 2022 EULAR recommendations discourage complete cessation of DMARDs due to flare risk. The evidence behind this recommendation is obtained from trial populations using biological DMARDs, representing only a subgroup of the total population of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. We hypothesised that patients requiring biological DMARDs represent a subgroup that is less capable of reaching sustained DMARD-free remission compared with patients not requiring a biological DMARD.

METHODS

In this study we used data from two prospectively followed up populations of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis, the Leiden Early Arthritis Clinic (EAC) and the treatment in the Rotterdam Early Arthritis Cohort (tREACH), a treat-to-target steered trial in which biological DMARDs were started when patients had inadequate response to triple DMARD-therapy (methotrexate, sulfasalazine, and hydroxychloroquine). Patient partners were involved in the design of both the EAC and tREACH. The primary outcome was sustained DMARD-free remission, which was defined as absence of clinical synovitis after discontinuation of DMARDs for at least 1 year. Patients who did or did not receive biological DMARDs in 5 years (EAC) or 3 years (tREACH) were compared using Kaplan-Meier curves.

FINDINGS

627 patients from the EAC were included, of whom 391 (62%) were female and 236 (38%) were male. The mean age was 60 years (SD 14) and 502 (95%) of 529 patients were White. 89 (14%) of 627 patients had ever used a biological DMARD and 538 (86%) had never used a biological DMARD. None of the patients that used a biological DMARD reached sustained DMARD-free remission, whereas 37% of the patients who never used a biological DMARD reached sustained DMARD-free remission at 5 years (hazard ratio [HR] 0·02, 95% CI 0·00-0·10; p<0·0001). From the tREACH population, 425 patients were included in the study. 286 (67%) patients were female, 139 (33%) were male, and the mean age was 54 years (SD 14); ethnicity data not recorded. 154 (36%) of 425 patients had ever used a biological DMARD and 271 (64%) had never used a biological DMARD during follow-up. None of the patients that used a biological DMARD reached sustained DMARD-free remission, whereas 15% of patients who never used a biological DMARD reached sustained DMARD-free remission at 3 years (HR 0·03, 95% CI 0·00-0·21; p<0·0001).

INTERPRETATION

For the subgroup of patients with rheumatoid arthritis who require biological DMARDs, sustained DMARD-free remission does not seem attainable. In contrast, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who do not require biological DMARDs, DMARD-free remission is attainable. These data suggest that the current EULAR recommendation to not stop DMARD use might suffer from ascertainment bias. Future recommendations about DMARD cessation should be amended.

FUNDING

The Dutch Arthritis Foundation and the European Research Council.

摘要

背景

在使用改善病情抗风湿药物(DMARDs)的类风湿关节炎患者中,约20%可实现持续的无需使用DMARDs的缓解。尽管如此,2022年欧洲抗风湿病联盟(EULAR)的建议不鼓励完全停用DMARDs,因为存在病情复发风险。该建议背后的证据来自使用生物DMARDs的试验人群,而这仅代表类风湿关节炎患者总人群中的一个亚组。我们推测,与不需要生物DMARDs的患者相比,需要生物DMARDs的患者亚组更难实现持续的无需使用DMARDs的缓解。

方法

在本研究中,我们使用了来自两个前瞻性随访的早期类风湿关节炎患者群体的数据,即莱顿早期关节炎诊所(EAC)和鹿特丹早期关节炎队列治疗研究(tREACH),后者是一项目标导向治疗试验,当患者对三联DMARD治疗(甲氨蝶呤、柳氮磺胺吡啶和羟氯喹)反应不足时开始使用生物DMARDs。患者伴侣参与了EAC和tREACH的设计。主要结局是持续的无需使用DMARDs的缓解,定义为停用DMARDs至少1年后无临床滑膜炎。使用Kaplan-Meier曲线比较在5年(EAC)或3年(tREACH)内接受或未接受生物DMARDs的患者。

结果

EAC纳入了627例患者,其中391例(62%)为女性,236例(38%)为男性。平均年龄为60岁(标准差14),529例患者中有502例(95%)为白人。627例患者中有89例(14%)曾使用过生物DMARDs,538例(86%)从未使用过生物DMARDs。使用生物DMARDs的患者中无一例实现持续的无需使用DMARDs的缓解,而从未使用过生物DMARDs的患者中有37%在5年时实现了持续的无需使用DMARDs的缓解(风险比[HR]0.02,95%置信区间0.00-0.10;p<0.0001)。在tREACH人群中,425例患者纳入研究。286例(67%)患者为女性,139例(33%)为男性,平均年龄为54岁(标准差14);未记录种族数据。425例患者中有154例(36%)在随访期间曾使用过生物DMARDs,271例(64%)从未使用过生物DMARDs。使用生物DMARDs的患者中无一例实现持续的无需使用DMARDs的缓解,而从未使用过生物DMARDs的患者中有15%在3年时实现了持续的无需使用DMARDs的缓解(HR 0.03,95%置信区间0.00-0.21;p<0.0001)。

解读

对于需要生物DMARDs的类风湿关节炎患者亚组,似乎无法实现持续的无需使用DMARDs的缓解。相比之下,在不需要生物DMARDs的类风湿关节炎患者中,可以实现无需使用DMARDs的缓解。这些数据表明,当前EULAR不停止使用DMARDs的建议可能存在确定偏倚。未来关于停用DMARDs的建议应予以修正。

资助

荷兰关节炎基金会和欧洲研究理事会。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验