Fu Wing, Baldwin Tobi F, Brechter Jacklyn H, Erickson Mark R, Kobal Kara, LaFay Vicki, Miller Teresa M, Morales Jaclyn
Programs in Physical Therapy, Department of Rehabilitation and Regenerative Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, United States.
Department of Physical Therapy, Brooks Rehabilitation College of Healthcare Sciences, Jacksonville University, Jacksonville, FL 32211, United States.
Phys Ther. 2025 Mar 3;105(3). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzae182.
The objective of this systematic review was to investigate the effects of educational interventions designed to develop physical therapist learners' clinical reasoning (CR) across the full continuum of professional development.
A systematic search was conducted of 6 databases, the entire Journal of Physical Therapy Education collection, and the reference lists of included articles through March 2022.
English-language primary relevant research studies of all research designs were included while grey literature was excluded.
Two reviewers independently extracted data from and determined risk of bias of each of the 40 included studies. Disagreements were resolved by consensus or use of a third reviewer. A narrative synthesis summarized and explained the quantitative data. Meta-analysis was not possible due to data heterogeneity. Qualitative data were synthesized using thematic analysis.
MAIN OUTCOME(S) AND MEASURE(S): Main outcomes were effects of the educational interventions per the Kirkpatrick model.
Forty articles met the inclusion criteria. Twenty-two of the 33 studies with quantitative data involving student or practicing physical therapists reported statistically significant positive outcomes. Three major themes emerged from thematic analysis of 23 studies: perceived educational gain, valued elements of educational interventions, and identified challenges to learning.
Educational interventions that appeared to have a positive impact on learning outcomes were identified. However, the available research lacks rigor for the authors to develop evidence-based guidelines to support the development of CR in physical therapist learners. Given the importance of CR, high quality studies are warranted. This comprehensive systematic review appeared to be the first one in the profession to have investigated the effects of educational interventions designed to develop learners' CR across the entire professional development. Educators and researchers may benefit from the findings to develop educational interventions and future studies.
本系统评价的目的是调查旨在培养物理治疗专业学习者在整个专业发展过程中的临床推理能力(CR)的教育干预措施的效果。
截至2022年3月,对6个数据库、《物理治疗教育杂志》的全部馆藏以及纳入文章的参考文献列表进行了系统检索。
纳入所有研究设计的英文主要相关研究,排除灰色文献。
两名评审员独立从40项纳入研究中提取数据并确定每项研究的偏倚风险。分歧通过协商一致或由第三位评审员解决。叙述性综合总结并解释了定量数据。由于数据异质性,无法进行荟萃分析。定性数据采用主题分析法进行综合。
主要结局是根据柯克帕特里克模型得出的教育干预措施的效果。
40篇文章符合纳入标准。在33项涉及学生或执业物理治疗师的定量数据研究中,22项报告了具有统计学意义的积极结果。对23项研究的主题分析得出了三个主要主题:感知到的教育收获、教育干预措施的重要元素以及确定的学习挑战。
确定了似乎对学习成果有积极影响的教育干预措施。然而,现有研究缺乏严谨性,作者无法制定基于证据的指南来支持物理治疗专业学习者临床推理能力的发展。鉴于临床推理的重要性,高质量研究是必要的。这项全面的系统评价似乎是该领域第一项调查旨在培养学习者在整个专业发展过程中临床推理能力的教育干预措施效果的研究。教育工作者和研究人员可能会从这些发现中受益,以制定教育干预措施和开展未来研究。