Wahlig Brian D, Khanna Ankur, MacInnis Bailey R, Copp Jonathan, Cross William W, Sems Stephen A, Yuan Brandon J, Hidden Krystin A
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Forrest General Hospital, Hattiesburg, MS.
J Orthop Trauma. 2025 Apr 1;39(4):174-179. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002952.
The aim of this study was to identify the rate at which the anterolateral (AL) tibial plafond is affected in comminuted suprasyndesmotic ankle fractures (OTA/AO 44C2) and to assess how its involvement affects clinical outcomes.
Retrospective review.
Level 1 Trauma Center.
Patients with a preoperative computed tomography treated surgically for OTA/AO 44C2 fractures from January 2005 to December 2021.
The primary outcome measure was the prevalence of AL plafond impaction or a displaced Tillaux-Chaput fracture. Secondary outcome measures included reoperation rate (excluding hardware removal), rate of new-onset ankle osteoarthritis, rate of ankle osteoarthritis progression, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score, and the Olerud Molander Ankle Score.
Fifty-three patients met inclusion criteria. The average age was 50 years (range 18-100), and 53% were female. The AL plafond was involved in 26 patients (49%), with AL plafond impaction in 11 patients (21%) and a displaced Tillaux-Chaput fragment in 15 patients (28%). Five patients (19%) received independent fixation of the AL plafond, and 3 of these patients had AL plafond impaction addressed. Thirty-eight patients (72%) had clinical follow-up of at least 6 months. Patients with AL plafond impaction had a higher rate of reoperation (excluding hardware removal) compared with those without any AL plafond involvement (hazard of reoperation = 8.3, 95% confidence interval, 1.4-15.3, P = 0.022) and a higher rate of new-onset ankle osteoarthritis (83% vs. 23%, P = 0.013). There was no difference in the rate of reoperation (11% vs. 9%, P = 0.748) or new-onset osteoarthritis (63% vs. 23%, P = 0.078) when comparing those with a displaced Tillaux-Chaput fracture to those without AL plafond involvement. There were no differences in Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (75% vs. 78% vs. 85%, P = 0.661) or Olerud Molander Ankle Score (70 points vs. 69 points vs. 81 points, P = 0.517) scores when comparing those with AL plafond impaction, those with Tillaux-Chaput fragments, and those with no AL plafond involvement.
Computed tomography evaluation is recommended in patients with comminuted suprasyndesmotic fibula fractures (OTA/AO 44C2) given their high association with AL plafond impaction and Tillaux-Chaput fracture. Patients with AL plafond impaction have a higher reoperation rate and new-onset ankle osteoarthritis compared with those without AL plafond involvement.
Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
本研究旨在确定在粉碎性胫腓联合上踝关节骨折(OTA/AO 44C2)中,胫前外侧(AL)平台受累的发生率,并评估其受累情况如何影响临床结果。
回顾性研究。
一级创伤中心。
2005年1月至2021年12月期间接受手术治疗的OTA/AO 44C2骨折且术前行计算机断层扫描的患者。
主要结果测量指标是AL平台撞击或移位的Tillaux-Chaput骨折的发生率。次要结果测量指标包括再次手术率(不包括取出内固定物)、新发踝关节骨关节炎发生率、踝关节骨关节炎进展率、单项评估数值评定分数以及Olerud Molander踝关节评分。
53例患者符合纳入标准。平均年龄为50岁(范围18 - 100岁),53%为女性。26例患者(49%)的AL平台受累,其中11例患者(21%)有AL平台撞击,15例患者(28%)有移位的Tillaux-Chaput骨折块。5例患者(19%)接受了AL平台的独立固定,其中3例患者的AL平台撞击得到处理。38例患者(72%)进行了至少6个月的临床随访。与无AL平台受累的患者相比,有AL平台撞击的患者再次手术率(不包括取出内固定物)更高(再次手术风险=8.3,95%置信区间,1.4 - 15.3,P = 0.022),新发踝关节骨关节炎发生率也更高(83%对23%,P = 0.013)。将有移位的Tillaux-Chaput骨折患者与无AL平台受累的患者进行比较时,再次手术率(11%对9%,P = 0.748)或新发骨关节炎发生率(63%对23%,P = 0.078)没有差异。在比较有AL平台撞击的患者、有Tillaux-Chaput骨折块的患者和无AL平台受累的患者时,单项评估数值评定分数(75%对78%对85%,P = 0.661)或Olerud Molander踝关节评分(70分对69分对81分,P = 0.517)没有差异。
鉴于粉碎性胫腓联合上腓骨骨折(OTA/AO 44C2)与AL平台撞击和Tillaux-Chaput骨折高度相关,建议对这类患者进行计算机断层扫描评估。与无AL平台受累的患者相比,有AL平台撞击的患者再次手术率和新发踝关节骨关节炎发生率更高。
预后III级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参阅作者须知。