de Bruijn Brigitte G C, van Dixhoorn Ingrid Danielle Ellen, Bolhuis J Elizabeth, Cornelissen Jan B W J, Stockhofe-Zurwieden Norbert, Kluivers Marion, Rebel Johanna M J
Wageningen Livestock Research, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Adaptation Physiology Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Front Vet Sci. 2024 Dec 9;11:1511209. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1511209. eCollection 2024.
We investigated whether environmental enrichment applied at different life stages of pigs affects the susceptibility to and severity of disease by studying immune cell functions around weaning and during nursery, the effects of infection in models and using a co-infection model of (PRRSV) followed by an infection. Pigs were either conventionally housed (CCH) or enriched housed throughout life, with enrichment consisting of extra space, rooting materials and co-mingling with another litter before weaning (EEH), or they were switched from conventional to enriched housing at weaning (CEH). Sixty days after birth, ten pigs per treatment were infected with PRRSV followed by an infection eight days later. Six other pigs per treatment were euthanized before their pen mates were exposed to the co-infection. From these piglets, bronchial-alveolar fluid was collected, and precision cut lung slices were taken to test the effect of the treatments in an infection model. At six days after weaning EEH pigs had higher whole blood cell counts and higher concentrations of IL1ß and TNFα than CCH and CEH pigs. In the precision cut lung slice model no differences in cytokine response in lung tissue after infection with swine influenza or were observed between treatments. After experimental co-infection the proportion of EEH pigs with lung lesions (3/10) tended to be lower than in CCH (8/10), with CEH (6/10) being in between. In conclusion, enriched housing from birth reduced disease severity to co-infection with PRRSV and . Enrichment applied after weaning also seemed to decrease the pathological lung deviations to the co-infection as compared to barren housed pigs, but to a much lower extent.
我们通过研究断奶前后和保育期间的免疫细胞功能、感染模型中的感染效应以及使用猪繁殖与呼吸综合征病毒(PRRSV)继发甲型流感病毒感染的共感染模型,来调查在猪的不同生命阶段采用环境富集措施是否会影响疾病易感性和严重程度。猪只在整个生命过程中要么采用传统饲养方式(CCH),要么采用富集饲养方式,富集饲养包括额外空间、垫料以及在断奶前与另一窝仔猪混养(EEH),或者在断奶时从传统饲养转换为富集饲养(CEH)。出生60天后,每组10头猪感染PRRSV,8天后再感染甲型流感病毒。每组另外6头猪在其同栏猪只接触共感染之前实施安乐死。从这些仔猪中采集支气管肺泡灌洗液,并获取精密肺切片,以在甲型流感病毒感染模型中测试处理措施的效果。断奶后6天,EEH猪的全血细胞计数以及IL1β和TNFα浓度高于CCH和CEH猪。在甲型流感病毒精密肺切片模型中,各处理组在感染猪流感或甲型流感病毒后肺组织中的细胞因子反应未观察到差异。实验性共感染后,EEH猪出现肺部病变的比例(3/10)往往低于CCH猪(8/10),CEH猪(6/10)介于两者之间。总之,从出生起采用富集饲养可降低与PRRSV和甲型流感病毒共感染时的疾病严重程度。与贫瘠饲养的猪相比,断奶后采用富集饲养似乎也能减少共感染时肺部的病理偏差,但程度要低得多。