Schütz Viktoria, Nessler Christopher-Leo, Duensing Anette, Zschäbitz Stefanie, Jäger Dirk, Debus Jürgen, Hohenfellner Markus, Duensing Stefan
Department of Urology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Precision Oncology of Urological Malignancies, Department of Urology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Front Oncol. 2024 Dec 10;14:1475914. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1475914. eCollection 2024.
The standard of care for patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) includes androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), novel antihormonal therapies (NHT) and/or chemotherapy. Patients with newly diagnosed oligometastatic prostate cancer (omPCa) represent a distinct subgroup of mHSPC, for which the optimal treatment, particularly the role of radical prostatectomy (RP) and metastasis-directed therapy (MDT), is currently under debate.
In this single center, retrospective analysis, 43 patients with newly diagnosed omPCa were included. All patients underwent RP as part of a multimodal, personalized treatment approach. Other treatments included ADT, NHT, MDT (surgery or radiotherapy), adjuvant radiotherapy (prostatic fossa and/or pelvic lymph nodes) or chemotherapy in various combinations. Clinical endpoints were progression free and cancer specific survival (PFS, CSS).
No patient with omPCa died from prostate cancer during an up to ten years follow-up period after intensified multimodal treatment i.e., RP, ADT, adjuvant radiation therapy and MDT (n=13). In contrast, patients requiring chemotherapy (n=10) showed a significantly worse PFS (p<0.001) and CSS (p<0.001). Patients receiving various combinations (<4 therapeutic modalities; n=20) showed a more favorable outcome than patients receiving chemotherapy, but differences in PFS and CSS were not statistically significant compared to patients receiving an intensified multimodal treatment.
An intensified, multimodal treatment approach including RP can lead to excellent survival outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed omPCa. Patients requiring chemotherapy have most likely a more aggressive disease and therefore a more rapid tumor progression. Future studies to identify markers for risk stratification in patients with omPCa are therefore needed.
转移性激素敏感性前列腺癌(mHSPC)患者的标准治疗方案包括雄激素剥夺治疗(ADT)、新型抗激素疗法(NHT)和/或化疗。新诊断的寡转移前列腺癌(omPCa)患者是mHSPC的一个独特亚组,目前对于其最佳治疗方案,尤其是根治性前列腺切除术(RP)和转移灶定向治疗(MDT)的作用存在争议。
在这项单中心回顾性分析中,纳入了43例新诊断的omPCa患者。所有患者均接受了RP,作为多模式个性化治疗方法的一部分。其他治疗包括ADT、NHT、MDT(手术或放疗)、辅助放疗(前列腺窝和/或盆腔淋巴结)或各种组合的化疗。临床终点为无进展生存期和癌症特异性生存期(PFS、CSS)。
在强化多模式治疗(即RP、ADT、辅助放疗和MDT,n = 13)后的长达十年随访期内,没有omPCa患者死于前列腺癌。相比之下,需要化疗的患者(n = 10)的PFS(p < 0.001)和CSS(p < 0.001)明显更差。接受各种组合(<4种治疗方式;n = 20)的患者比接受化疗的患者预后更好,但与接受强化多模式治疗的患者相比,PFS和CSS的差异无统计学意义。
包括RP在内的强化多模式治疗方法可使新诊断的omPCa患者获得优异的生存结果。需要化疗的患者疾病可能更具侵袭性,因此肿瘤进展更快。因此,未来需要开展研究以确定omPCa患者风险分层的标志物。