Kuo Hung-Chou, Ro Long-Sun, Lin Chia-Ni, Chu Chun-Che, Liao Ming-Feng, Chang Hong-Shiu
Department of Neurology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Linkou Medical Center and College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Mol Genet Metab Rep. 2024 Dec 5;41:101169. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgmr.2024.101169. eCollection 2024 Dec.
For patients with acute intermittent porphyria (AIP), a true attack could be difficult to distinguish from chronic abdominal pain. This study focused on treatment responses from two patients with confirmed elevated biochemical data (delta-aminolevulinic acid (ALA), porphobilinogen (PBG)) and clinical evidence for acute attacks before starting givosiran.
Data from patients who participated in the phase III givosiran trial in Taiwan between May 2018 and May 2021 were reviewed. The pre-trial and post-trial biochemical data (urinary ALA/PBG), annualized attack rate (AAR), for two participants were obtained from our hospital record.
Two patients had detailed records of biochemical evidence of acute attacks pre-trial (ALA:11.66-79.8 mg/24-h urine collection, PBG:75.45-160.11 mg/24-h). Patient Pb/Gn#1 with a disease duration of 1.6-years, had zero AAR during givosiran treatment. Patient Pb/Gn#2 had received prior hemin prophylaxis, had AIP for 6.7-years, had an AAR of 17.0 before givosiran, and an AAR of 12 at the post-trial compassionate-use period. The change in SF-12 PCS score from baseline was marginally clinical-meaningful (2.8 for Patient Pb/Gn#1 and 2.0 for Patient Pb/Gn#2).
Our data from 2 AIP patients with biochemical and clinical evidence of acute attacks suggested that patient with a shorter disease duration may respond better in terms of AAR. Further studies are necessary to understand the association between disease characteristics, treatment history, and optimal treatment response for patients with recurrent AIP in terms of both attack frequency and quality of life.
对于急性间歇性卟啉病(AIP)患者而言,真正的发作可能难以与慢性腹痛相区分。本研究聚焦于两名生化数据(δ-氨基-γ-酮戊酸(ALA)、卟胆原(PBG))确诊升高且在开始使用givosiran之前有急性发作临床证据的患者的治疗反应。
回顾了2018年5月至2021年5月期间在台湾参与givosiran III期试验的患者数据。从我院记录中获取了两名参与者的试验前和试验后生化数据(尿ALA/PBG)、年化发作率(AAR)。
两名患者有试验前急性发作生化证据的详细记录(ALA:11.66 - 79.8 mg/24小时尿液收集,PBG:75.45 - 160.11 mg/24小时)。疾病持续时间为1.6年的患者Pb/Gn#1在givosiran治疗期间AAR为零。患者Pb/Gn#2此前接受过血红素预防,患AIP 6.7年,在givosiran治疗前AAR为17.0,在试验后的同情用药期AAR为12。SF-12身体功能(PCS)评分较基线的变化在临床上有一定意义(患者Pb/Gn#1为2.8,患者Pb/Gn#2为2.0)。
我们对两名有急性发作生化和临床证据的AIP患者的数据表明,疾病持续时间较短的患者在AAR方面可能反应更好。有必要进一步开展研究,以了解疾病特征、治疗史与复发性AIP患者在发作频率和生活质量方面的最佳治疗反应之间的关联。