Timóteo Rafaela, Pinto David, Matono Pedro, Mavioso Carlos, Cardoso Maria-João, Gouveia Pedro, Marques Tiago, Simões Lopes Daniel
Breast Unit Champalimaud Foundation Aven ida Brasília Lisboa Portugal.
ITI/LARSyS Hub Criativo do Beato Factory Lisbon Lisboa Portugal.
Healthc Technol Lett. 2024 Dec 10;11(6):301-306. doi: 10.1049/htl2.12095. eCollection 2024 Dec.
Deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap reconstruction is a common technique for breast reconstruction surgery in cancer patients. Preoperative planning typically depends on radiological reports and 2D images to help surgeons locate abdominal perforator vessels before surgery. Here, BREAST+, an augmented reality interface for the HoloLens 2, designed to facilitate accurate marking of perforator locations on the patients' skin and to seamlessly access relevant clinical data in the operating room is proposed. The system is evaluated in a controlled setting by conducting a user study with 27 medical students and 2 breast surgeons. Quantitative (marking error, task completion time, and number of task repetitions) and qualitative (perceived usability, perceived workload, user preference and user satisfaction) data are collected to assess BREAST+ performance during perforator marking. The average time taken to mark each perforator is 7.7 ± 6.5 s, with an average absolute error of 6.8 ± 2.6 mm and an estimated average deviation of 3.6 ± 1.4 mm. The results revealed non-negligeable biases in user estimates likely attributed to depth perception inaccuracies. Still, the study concluded that BREAST+ is both accurate and considerably more efficient (∼6 times faster) when compared to the conventional perforator marking approach.
腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣重建术是癌症患者乳房重建手术的常用技术。术前规划通常依赖于放射学报告和二维图像,以帮助外科医生在手术前定位腹部穿支血管。在此,提出了BREAST+,这是一种用于HoloLens 2的增强现实界面,旨在便于在患者皮肤上准确标记穿支位置,并在手术室无缝访问相关临床数据。通过对27名医学生和2名乳腺外科医生进行用户研究,在受控环境中对该系统进行评估。收集定量(标记误差、任务完成时间和任务重复次数)和定性(感知可用性、感知工作量、用户偏好和用户满意度)数据,以评估BREAST+在穿支标记过程中的性能。标记每个穿支的平均时间为7.7±6.5秒,平均绝对误差为6.8±2.6毫米,估计平均偏差为3.6±1.4毫米。结果显示,用户估计中存在不可忽视的偏差,这可能归因于深度感知不准确。尽管如此,该研究得出结论,与传统的穿支标记方法相比,BREAST+既准确又高效得多(快约6倍)。