Alsabri G A, van der Horst F, Alkaabi S A, Alavi S A, Forouzanfar T, Helder M N
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery/Oral Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers and Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Academisch Centrum Tandheelkunde Amsterdam (ACTA), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Growth Factors. 2024 Oct;42(4):216-228. doi: 10.1080/08977194.2024.2432951. Epub 2024 Dec 25.
Since its introduction in 2001, multiple platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) centrifugation protocols have emerged, but the variations in growth factor release that result from these protocols remain unclear. This review aimed to evaluate growth factor release across three PRF protocols: leukocyte-PRF (L-PRF), advanced-PRF (A-PRF/+), and injectable-PRF (i-PRF). A comprehensive search was conducted using the MEDLINE and Embase databases, identifying 14 studies that met the inclusion criteria. Due to significant heterogeneity in study designs and methodologies, a meta-analysis was not feasible. However, our findings suggest that lower-speed centrifugation protocols, such as A-PRF/+ and i-PRF, tend to provide a more uniform cell distribution and sustain higher growth factor release over time compared to the conventional L-PRF protocol. Despite these observations, the current evidence is insufficient to draw definitive conclusions about the growth factor release levels among L-PRF, A-PRF/+, and i-PRF. Further well-designed, comparative studies are required to clarify these differences and establish optimal protocols for clinical use.
自2001年引入以来,出现了多种富血小板纤维蛋白(PRF)离心方案,但这些方案导致的生长因子释放差异仍不清楚。本综述旨在评估三种PRF方案中的生长因子释放情况:白细胞-PRF(L-PRF)、高级-PRF(A-PRF/+)和可注射-PRF(i-PRF)。使用MEDLINE和Embase数据库进行了全面检索,确定了14项符合纳入标准的研究。由于研究设计和方法存在显著异质性,无法进行荟萃分析。然而,我们的研究结果表明,与传统的L-PRF方案相比,较低速度的离心方案,如A-PRF/+和i-PRF,往往能提供更均匀的细胞分布,并随着时间的推移维持更高的生长因子释放。尽管有这些观察结果,但目前的证据不足以就L-PRF、A-PRF/+和i-PRF之间的生长因子释放水平得出明确结论。需要进一步设计良好的比较研究来阐明这些差异,并建立临床使用的最佳方案。