Sayegh Nicolas, Jo Yeonjung, Gebrael Georges, Tripathi Nishita, Chigarira Beverly, Srivastava Ayana, Nordblad Blake, Dal Emre, Hage Chehade Chadi, Mahlow Jon, Maughan Benjamin L, Gupta Sumati, Agarwal Neeraj, Swami Umang
Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX.
Division of Biostatistics, Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT; Cancer Biostatistics, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2025 Feb;23(1):102287. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102287. Epub 2024 Dec 6.
Enfortumab vedotin (EV) is a nectin-4-directed antibody and microtubule inhibitor conjugate indicated for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) who have received prior platinum-based chemotherapy and PD-1/L1 inhibitors or are ineligible for cisplatin-containing regimens and have undergone at least 1 prior line of therapy. EV is also indicated in combination with pembrolizumab in the first-line setting. However, real-world effectiveness of EV based on treatment line and impact of prior therapy remains unclear.
This retrospective study utilized the nationwide Flatiron Health electronic health record (EHR)-derived de-identified database. Patients with advanced, recurrent, or mUC of upper or lower urinary tract who received single-agent EV in the second-line or beyond after December 18, 2019 (FDA accelerated approval date), were included. Patients without documentation of first-line therapy or without evidence of contact for 90 days from mUC diagnosis were excluded. Time to next therapy (TTNT) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed based on treatment line and prior platinum-based chemotherapy and PD-1/L1 inhibitors using Kaplan-Meier survival estimates and its 95% confidence interval.
Between January 17, 2020, and September 30, 2022, 6566 patients with mUC received systemic treatment, with 431 receiving EV. EV monotherapy was administered across various lines (N = 371): second (157), third (132), fourth (62), and fifth (20). Approximately 22% of patients had prior platinum-based therapy, and 48% had prior PD-1/L1 inhibitors. Median TTNT and OS varied across treatment lines, with patients with prior platinum exposure generally showing longer TTNT and OS, notably in those receiving EV in the fourth-line setting.
EV demonstrates efficacy in patients with mUC regardless of prior receipt of platinum-based chemotherapy and PD-1/L1 inhibitors or treatment line. While only hypothesis-generating, these findings provide valuable insights for patient counseling, prognostication, and therapeutic decision-making in clinical practice.
恩扎妥昔单抗(EV)是一种靶向连接蛋白4的抗体与微管抑制剂偶联物,适用于接受过铂类化疗和PD-1/L1抑制剂治疗,或不符合含顺铂方案且至少接受过1线既往治疗的转移性尿路上皮癌(mUC)患者。EV也被批准在一线治疗中与帕博利珠单抗联合使用。然而,基于治疗线别的EV实际疗效以及既往治疗的影响仍不明确。
这项回顾性研究利用了全国性的Flatiron Health电子健康记录(EHR)去识别数据库。纳入2019年12月18日(FDA加速批准日期)之后在二线及更后线接受单药EV治疗的上尿路或下尿路晚期、复发性或mUC患者。排除无一线治疗记录或自mUC诊断后90天内无接触证据的患者。使用Kaplan-Meier生存估计及其95%置信区间,根据治疗线别以及既往铂类化疗和PD-1/L1抑制剂情况分析至下次治疗时间(TTNT)和总生存期(OS)。
在2020年1月17日至2022年9月30日期间,6566例mUC患者接受了全身治疗,其中431例接受了EV治疗。EV单药治疗分布于不同线别(N = 371):二线(157例)、三线(132例)、四线(62例)和五线(20例)。约22%的患者曾接受铂类治疗,48%的患者曾接受PD-1/L1抑制剂治疗。不同治疗线别的中位TTNT和OS有所不同,既往接受过铂类治疗的患者通常显示出更长的TTNT和OS,尤其是在四线接受EV治疗的患者中。
无论既往是否接受铂类化疗和PD-1/L1抑制剂治疗或治疗线别如何,EV在mUC患者中均显示出疗效。虽然这些结果仅为初步结论,但为临床实践中的患者咨询、预后评估和治疗决策提供了有价值的见解。