Suppr超能文献

不同采样方法联合宏基因组下一代测序技术对重症肺炎患者呼吸道标本进行病原学诊断的评估

Evaluation of Different Sampling Methods Combined with Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing of Respiratory Specimens in Etiological Diagnosis of Patients with Severe Pneumonia.

作者信息

Zhou Peng, Zhang Dehua, Fu Jianjian, Zhu Dongling, Li Shixiao

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.

Emergency Department, Enze Hospital, Taizhou Enze Medical Center (Group), Taizhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Infect Drug Resist. 2024 Dec 21;17:5729-5738. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S504173. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the value of respiratory specimens collected via different sampling methods combined with metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) in the etiological diagnosis of severe pneumonia.

METHODS

A total of 117 patients with severe pneumonia between 2019 and 2024 were included in this study, with 60 patients undergoing endotracheal aspiration (ETA) and 57 undergoing bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), respectively. Patient records were retrospectively reviewed. Both ETA and BAL samples were tested using mNGS and conventional microbiological tests (CMT) to compare the detection rates, microbial profiles and their effects on clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

The positive rates of mNGS for ETA and BAL samples were 96.7% and 80.7%, respectively, which were higher than CMT. A total of 39 pathogenic microorganisms were detected, of which and -4 (HSV-4), and (CMV) were the most commonly detected as bacteria, fungi and viruses, respectively. The percentages of (30.0% vs 12.3%, = 0.019) and (25.0% vs 8.8%, = 0.020) were significantly higher in the ETA group compared to the BALF group. The detection rate of three or more microorganisms was notably higher in the ETA group. No significant differences existed in antibiotics adjustment between the groups. The ETA group experienced a higher frequency of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), mechanical ventilation and complications. There was no significant difference in the hospital length of stay, duration of mechanical ventilation and mortality between both groups.

CONCLUSION

Respiratory specimens collected by different sampling methods yield different microbial findings. ETA and BAL combined with mNGS play a role in guiding the pathogenetic diagnosis of patients with severe pneumonia. However, it is recommended that their sampling methods be determined by clinical symptoms and patient conditions.

摘要

目的

评估通过不同采样方法采集的呼吸道标本联合宏基因组下一代测序(mNGS)在重症肺炎病因诊断中的价值。

方法

本研究纳入了2019年至2024年间的117例重症肺炎患者,其中60例接受气管内吸引(ETA),57例接受支气管肺泡灌洗(BAL)。对患者记录进行回顾性分析。ETA和BAL样本均采用mNGS和传统微生物学检测(CMT)进行检测,以比较检测率、微生物谱及其对临床结局的影响。

结果

ETA和BAL样本的mNGS阳性率分别为96.7%和80.7%,均高于CMT。共检测到39种致病微生物,其中 和 -4(HSV - 4)以及 (CMV)分别是最常检测到的细菌、真菌和病毒。ETA组中 (30.0%对12.3%, = 0.019)和 (25.0%对8.8%, = 0.020)的百分比显著高于BALF组。ETA组中三种或更多微生物的检测率明显更高。两组之间在抗生素调整方面无显著差异。ETA组接受持续肾脏替代治疗(CRRT)、机械通气和并发症的频率更高。两组在住院时间、机械通气持续时间和死亡率方面无显著差异。

结论

不同采样方法采集的呼吸道标本产生不同的微生物检测结果。ETA和BAL联合mNGS在指导重症肺炎患者的病原学诊断中发挥作用。然而,建议根据临床症状和患者情况确定其采样方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验