Department of Intensive Care Unit, People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Guangxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nangning, 530021, China.
The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
BMC Infect Dis. 2024 Nov 2;24(1):1232. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-10108-6.
For patients with pneumonia, the rapid detection of pathogens is still a major global problem in clinical practice because traditional diagnostic techniques for infection are time-consuming and insensitive. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) is a novel technique that has the potential to improve pathogen diagnosis. This study aimed to investigate the microbiological diagnostic ability of mNGS compared with conventional culture and to determine the optimal time to test patients for pneumonia.
A prospective study using data from June 2020 to June 2021 was performed at a tertiary teaching hospital in China. We included 56 patients from all adult patients with a clinical diagnosis of pneumonia. Blood and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) samples were taken for simultaneous mNGS and conventional culture testing.
All 56 patients underwent both conventional culture and mNGS. Of these patients, 37 were diagnosed with severe pneumonia and 17 were diagnosed with non-severe pneumonia. The top three pathogenic bacteria detected by mNGS were Acinetobacter baumannii, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Enterococcus faecium was detected more frequently in the non-severe pneumonia group (4 vs. 0, p < 0.05). The findings revealed that the detection rate of mNGS (84%) was superior to that of conventional culture methods (48%). Notably, the percentage of mNGS-positive BALF samples (46/56, 82.14%) was significantly greater than that of blood samples (27/56, 48.21%). The etiological comparison demonstrated that mNGS-positive samples, which received clinical approval, tended to be associated with a more normalized temperature, lower PCO2 levels, and a higher SOFA score than mNGS-negative samples (p = 0.022, p = 0.0.028, and p = 0.038, respectively).
In this study, we discovered that the etiology of lung infections frequently involves multiple pathogens. The use of mNGS in BALF is instrumental for detecting nonviral pathogens associated with lung infections. Although the rate of positive blood NGS results is significantly influenced by various clinical factors, for patients suspected of having viral, Legionella, or tsutsugamushi infections, plasma mNGS could serve as a complementary diagnostic tool.
对于患有肺炎的患者,快速检测病原体仍然是临床实践中的一个全球性重大问题,因为感染的传统诊断技术既耗时又不敏感。宏基因组下一代测序(mNGS)是一种有潜力提高病原体诊断的新技术。本研究旨在调查 mNGS 与传统培养相比的微生物学诊断能力,并确定检测肺炎患者的最佳时间。
这是一项在中国一家三级教学医院进行的前瞻性研究,使用 2020 年 6 月至 2021 年 6 月的数据。我们纳入了所有临床诊断为肺炎的成年患者中的 56 名患者。采集血液和支气管肺泡灌洗液(BALF)样本进行同时进行 mNGS 和传统培养检测。
所有 56 名患者均同时进行了传统培养和 mNGS。这些患者中,37 名被诊断为重症肺炎,17 名被诊断为非重症肺炎。mNGS 检测到的前三种病原体是鲍曼不动杆菌、肺炎克雷伯菌和铜绿假单胞菌。粪肠球菌在非重症肺炎组中检出率更高(4 比 0,p<0.05)。研究结果表明,mNGS 的检测率(84%)优于传统培养方法(48%)。值得注意的是,mNGS 阳性 BALF 样本的百分比(46/56,82.14%)显著高于血液样本(27/56,48.21%)。病因比较表明,mNGS 阳性且经临床批准的样本,其体温趋于正常、PCO2 水平较低、SOFA 评分较高,与 mNGS 阴性样本相比,差异有统计学意义(p=0.022,p=0.0.028,p=0.038)。
本研究发现,肺部感染的病因常常涉及多种病原体。mNGS 在 BALF 中的应用有助于检测与肺部感染相关的非病毒病原体。尽管血液 NGS 阳性结果的比例受到多种临床因素的显著影响,但对于疑似病毒、军团菌或恙虫病感染的患者,血浆 mNGS 可作为一种补充诊断工具。