Yu Le, Keilani Amin, Tran Nam Nghiep, Escribà-Gelonch Marc, Goodsite Michael, Sandhu Sukhbir, Sandhu Harpinder, Hessel Volker
School of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Science, Engineering and Technology, The University of Adelaide Adelaide Australia
Institute of Sustainability, Energy and Resources (ISER), The University of Adelaide Adelaide Australia.
RSC Sustain. 2024 Dec 12;3(3):1102-1113. doi: 10.1039/d4su00423j. eCollection 2025 Mar 5.
Environmental, social and governance (ESG) criteria demand that enterprises should not be assessed solely on their financial performance, but also on their environmental, social, and governance performance. This numerical assessment of ESG criteria enables them to be evaluated with the consideration of other financial issues of enterprises' performance and thereby guides financial investments into environmentally and socially responsible firms. ESG, however, solidifies the continuance of conventional technologies but can potentially disadvantage emerging technologies. This study is the first to forecast the ESG potential of emerging chemical technologies. The Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI) rating system is applied to one of the top 3 global chemical processes. Ammonia (NH) is produced the Haber-Bosch (HB) process, which needs a huge fossil fuel input and high energy consumption, leading to a significant contribution to carbon dioxide (CO) emissions. In contrast, the ESG assessment rates emerging plasma technology and its spearhead companies that lead innovation and development in this field, which provide the benefits of being a clean, sustainable alternative for green NH production. Five different plasma-technology companies are considered, with the technology readiness level (TRL) ranging from 3 to 9. These are compared to five different conventional HB companies. We examine the final ESG result of the plasma technology companies, exploring their environmental advances and social viability. In this study, five different themes were selected, including eleven issues, to measure the plasma-technology company's management related to ESG risks and opportunities.
环境、社会和治理(ESG)标准要求企业不应仅根据其财务业绩进行评估,还应根据其环境、社会和治理业绩进行评估。对ESG标准的这种量化评估能够在考虑企业业绩的其他财务问题的情况下对其进行评估,从而引导金融投资进入对环境和社会负责的公司。然而,ESG巩固了传统技术的延续性,但可能对新兴技术不利。本研究首次预测了新兴化学技术的ESG潜力。摩根士丹利资本国际(MSCI)评级系统应用于全球三大化工工艺之一。氨(NH₃)通过哈伯-博施法(HB法)生产,该方法需要大量化石燃料投入和高能耗,导致二氧化碳(CO₂)排放量显著增加。相比之下,ESG评估对新兴等离子体技术及其在该领域引领创新和发展的先锋公司进行了评级,这些技术为绿色氨生产提供了清洁、可持续的替代方案。研究考虑了五家不同的等离子体技术公司,其技术就绪水平(TRL)从3到9不等。将这些公司与五家不同的传统HB公司进行比较。我们研究了等离子体技术公司的最终ESG结果,探索它们在环境方面的进步和社会可行性。在本研究中,选择了五个不同的主题,包括十一个问题,以衡量等离子体技术公司与ESG风险和机遇相关的管理情况。