• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2022年对乌克兰战争难民持续援助的个性和情境决定因素

Personality and Situational Determinants of Sustained Helping Towards Ukrainian War Refugees in 2022.

作者信息

Walczak Radosław, Błońska Katarzyna, Zdybek Przemysław, Kardasz Zofia

机构信息

Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Opole, Opole, Poland.

出版信息

Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2024 Dec 21;17:4355-4367. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S483264. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.2147/PRBM.S483264
PMID:39722778
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11669353/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of the research was to determine the personality and situational predictors of helping behavior towards war refugees from Ukraine in 2022.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A survey with repeated measurement was conducted, in which 720 people participated in the first date in March 2022 and in the next one in June 2022, n = 127. The study was conducted online, and the respondents were recruited through advertisements on websites and groups helping refugees. In the context of personality factors, five basic personality traits (IPIP-20), the degree of altruism (IPIP Altruism scale) and locus of control (Drwal's Delta Scale), and trait anxiety (STAI) were measured. The main situational factors included the sense of threat of armed conflict (GAD-7), the level of state anxiety (STAI) and the amount of time spent following information about the war in the media. In addition, the level of social distance towards Russians and Ukrainians was measured (Bogardus Scale), and basic birth data were recorded.

RESULTS

Based on the above variables, a significant linear regression model was built, explaining more than half of the variance in the phenomenon of continuous helping. The important role of both personality factors - altruism, and situational factors such as state anxiety or social distance towards Russians was demonstrated. Moreover, people with a high level of altruism keep helping the refugees regardless of their level of feeling threatened after the war's outbreak, while people with a lower level of altruism keep on helping only when their sense of threat is high.

CONCLUSION

The level of altruism, perceived situational anxiety and attitude towards the aggressor (in this case Russia) are important factors supporting continuous helping refugees from Ukraine.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定2022年帮助乌克兰战争难民行为的人格和情境预测因素。

患者与方法

进行了一项重复测量的调查,2022年3月第一次有720人参与,2022年6月第二次有127人参与。研究通过网络进行,受访者通过网站广告和帮助难民的群组招募。在人格因素方面,测量了五种基本人格特质(IPIP - 20)、利他主义程度(IPIP利他主义量表)、控制点(德瓦尔三角量表)和特质焦虑(STAI)。主要情境因素包括武装冲突的威胁感(GAD - 7)、状态焦虑水平(STAI)以及在媒体上关注战争信息所花费的时间。此外,测量了对俄罗斯人和乌克兰人的社会距离水平(博加德斯量表),并记录了基本出生数据。

结果

基于上述变量,建立了一个显著的线性回归模型,解释了持续帮助现象中一半以上的方差。证明了人格因素——利他主义,以及情境因素如状态焦虑或对俄罗斯人的社会距离的重要作用。此外,利他主义水平高的人无论战争爆发后其受威胁程度如何都持续帮助难民,而利他主义水平低的人只有在威胁感高时才持续提供帮助。

结论

利他主义水平、感知到的情境焦虑以及对侵略者(在这种情况下是俄罗斯)的态度是支持持续帮助乌克兰难民的重要因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ff7/11669353/f6ef5c4df982/PRBM-17-4355-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ff7/11669353/f6ef5c4df982/PRBM-17-4355-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ff7/11669353/f6ef5c4df982/PRBM-17-4355-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Personality and Situational Determinants of Sustained Helping Towards Ukrainian War Refugees in 2022.2022年对乌克兰战争难民持续援助的个性和情境决定因素
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2024 Dec 21;17:4355-4367. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S483264. eCollection 2024.
2
The Opinions of Poles about the Need to Provide Humanitarian Aid to Refugees from the Area Covered by the Russian-Ukrainian War.波兰人对向俄乌战争地区难民提供人道主义援助必要性的看法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 16;19(20):13369. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192013369.
3
The role of fear, closeness, and norms in shaping help towards war refugees.恐惧、亲密关系和规范在塑造对战争难民的帮助方面的作用。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 26;13(1):1465. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-28249-0.
4
Associations between affective temperament, perceived stress, and helping among Ukrainians and Poles in the context of the war in Ukraine.在乌克兰战争背景下,乌克兰人和波兰人的情感气质、感知压力与帮助行为之间的关联。
Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2024 Aug;16(3):944-966. doi: 10.1111/aphw.12487. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
5
Mental health and sleep disturbances among Ukrainian refugees in the context of Russian-Ukrainian war: A preliminary result from online-survey.俄乌战争背景下乌克兰难民的心理健康与睡眠障碍:在线调查的初步结果
Sleep Med. 2024 Jan;113:342-348. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2023.12.004. Epub 2023 Dec 10.
6
People act when they feel obliged. Prosocial intentions toward Ukrainian refugees in Poland during the first two weeks of the war in Ukraine.人们在感到有义务时会采取行动。乌克兰战争头两周波兰民众对乌克兰难民的亲社会意图。
Curr Issues Personal Psychol. 2024 Jan 16;12(3):217-224. doi: 10.5114/cipp/177007. eCollection 2024.
7
The outbreak of the 2022 Russo-Ukrainian war: mental health of poles and their attitude to refugees.2022 年俄乌战争爆发:波兰人的心理健康及其对难民的态度。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jun 23;11:1155904. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1155904. eCollection 2023.
8
The stress of war. Recommendations for the protection of mental health and wellbeing for both Ukrainian refugees as well as Poles supporting them.战争压力。为保护乌克兰难民和支持他们的波兰人的心理健康和福祉提出的建议。
Psychiatr Pol. 2023 Aug 31;57(4):729-746. doi: 10.12740/PP/156157.
9
Love thy (Ukrainian) neighbour: Willingness to help refugees depends on their origin and is mediated by perceptions of similarity and threat.爱你的(乌克兰)邻居:帮助难民的意愿取决于他们的出身,并受到相似性和威胁认知的调节。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2024 Apr;63(2):499-517. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12691. Epub 2023 Oct 24.
10
Barriers to healthcare access and continuity of care among Ukrainian war refugees in Europe: findings from the RefuHealthAccess study.欧洲乌克兰战争难民获得医疗保健及医疗连续性的障碍:RefuHealthAccess研究的结果
Front Public Health. 2025 Apr 2;13:1516161. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1516161. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Social bond dynamics and the evolution of helping.社会纽带动态与助人行为的演化
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Mar 12;121(11):e2317736121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2317736121. Epub 2024 Mar 7.
2
Association between mental health, psychological characteristics, and motivational functions of volunteerism among Polish and Ukrainian volunteers during the Russo-Ukrainian War.俄乌战争期间波兰和乌克兰志愿者的心理健康、心理特征与志愿行为动机功能之间的关系。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 25;13(1):20725. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-47840-z.
3
Associations between affective temperament, perceived stress, and helping among Ukrainians and Poles in the context of the war in Ukraine.
在乌克兰战争背景下,乌克兰人和波兰人的情感气质、感知压力与帮助行为之间的关联。
Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2024 Aug;16(3):944-966. doi: 10.1111/aphw.12487. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
4
Does threat trigger prosociality? The relation between basic individual values, threat appraisals, and prosocial helping intentions during the COVID-19 pandemic.威胁会引发亲社会行为吗?新冠疫情期间基本个人价值观、威胁评估与亲社会帮助意图之间的关系。
Curr Psychol. 2023 Jun 13:1-13. doi: 10.1007/s12144-023-04829-1.
5
Personality and context-related factors of helping and helping-related affect during early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic.人格和与情境相关的因素对 COVID-19 大流行早期助人行为和相关情感的影响。
Scand J Psychol. 2023 Feb;64(1):89-98. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12857. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
6
An evolutionary explanation for ineffective altruism.无效利他主义的进化解释。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Dec;4(12):1245-1257. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-00950-4. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
7
Searching for the Prosocial Personality: A Big Five Approach to Linking Personality and Prosocial Behavior.寻找亲社会人格:一种将人格与亲社会行为联系起来的大五人格方法。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2016 Sep;42(9):1177-92. doi: 10.1177/0146167216652859. Epub 2016 Jul 8.
8
Afraid to help: social anxiety partially mediates the association between 5-HTTLPR triallelic genotype and prosocial behavior.害怕帮助:社交焦虑部分中介了 5-HTTLPR 三核苷酸基因型与亲社会行为之间的关系。
Soc Neurosci. 2013;8(5):400-6. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2013.807874. Epub 2013 Jun 21.
9
Prosociality: the contribution of traits, values, and self-efficacy beliefs.亲社会行为:特质、价值观和自我效能信念的贡献。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 Jun;102(6):1289-303. doi: 10.1037/a0025626. Epub 2011 Sep 26.
10
The bystander-effect: a meta-analytic review on bystander intervention in dangerous and non-dangerous emergencies.旁观者效应:对危险和非危险紧急情况下旁观者干预的元分析综述。
Psychol Bull. 2011 Jul;137(4):517-37. doi: 10.1037/a0023304.