Sun Hao-Yue, Wu Le-Can, Xu Meng-Jie, Zheng En-Dian, Yu Ying-Cong, Ye Yi
Department of Gastroenterology, The Wenzhou Third Clinical Institute Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou People's Hospital, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Shanghai University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, 325000, People's Republic of China.
Department of Laboratory Medicine, The Wenzhou Third Clinical Institute Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou People's Hospital, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Shanghai University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, 325000, People's Republic of China.
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2024 Dec 20;17:4843-4856. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S494810. eCollection 2024.
This study aims to investigate the alterations in serum bile acid profiles among individuals with fatty liver (including non-alcoholic fatty liver (NAFL) and alcoholic fatty liver (AFL) and evaluate their clinical significance when combined with liver enzyme levels.
A cohort of 110 individuals with fatty liver (including non-alcoholic fatty liver 58 individuals and alcoholic fatty liver 52 individuals) was selected from the Department of Gastroenterology at Wenzhou People's Hospital between January 2021 and December 2022, while a control group of 66 healthy individuals was recruited from the hospital's health examination center during the same period. Clinical data and blood samples were collected from all participants. Serum bile acid profiles were quantified using ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS). Statistical analysis was conducted in conjunction with liver enzyme indicators.
In the NAFL group, GCA, TCA, and TCDCA levels were significantly elevated compared to the control group, with GCA (AUC 0.754, sensitivity 0.707, specificity 0.712), TCA (AUC 0.770, sensitivity 0.724, specificity 0.712), and TCDCA (AUC 0.782, sensitivity 0.810, specificity 0.652) showing strong diagnostic value. In the AFL group, TCDCA, TCA, GCA, TUDCA, and GUDCA were significantly elevated, with AUC values ranging from 0.848 to 0.912. Among these, TUDCA had the highest sensitivity (0.885) and specificity (0.773) for AFL diagnosis. TUDCA (sensitivity 0.615, specificity 0.897) was the key bile acid distinguishing AFL from NAFL, with an optimal cut-off of 36.33 nmol/L. These bile acids show significant diagnostic potential for differentiating NAFL and AFL.
The bile acid profiles in both NAFL and AFL patients show changes, which hold potential clinical significance and may serve as serum biomarkers to differentiate NAFL from AFL.
本研究旨在调查脂肪肝患者(包括非酒精性脂肪肝(NAFL)和酒精性脂肪肝(AFL))血清胆汁酸谱的变化,并评估其与肝酶水平联合时的临床意义。
选取2021年1月至2022年12月期间温州人民医院消化内科的110例脂肪肝患者(包括58例非酒精性脂肪肝患者和52例酒精性脂肪肝患者),同期从医院健康体检中心招募66例健康个体作为对照组。收集所有参与者的临床资料和血液样本。采用超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法(UPLC-MS/MS)对血清胆汁酸谱进行定量分析,并结合肝酶指标进行统计分析。
在NAFL组中,GCA、TCA和TCDCA水平较对照组显著升高,其中GCA(AUC 0.754,灵敏度0.707,特异性0.712)、TCA(AUC 0.770,灵敏度0.724,特异性0.712)和TCDCA(AUC 0.782,灵敏度0.810,特异性0.652)具有较强的诊断价值。在AFL组中,TCDCA、TCA、GCA、TUDCA和GUDCA显著升高,AUC值在0.848至0.912之间。其中,TUDCA对AFL诊断的灵敏度最高(0.885),特异性最强(0.773)。TUDCA(灵敏度0.615,特异性0.897)是区分AFL与NAFL的关键胆汁酸,最佳截断值为36.33 nmol/L。这些胆汁酸对鉴别NAFL和AFL具有显著的诊断潜力。
NAFL和AFL患者的胆汁酸谱均有变化,具有潜在的临床意义,可能作为区分NAFL和AFL的血清生物标志物。