Dezfouli Seyedeh Mahsa Mahmoudinezhad, Gharab Saeid Gholami, Hamidi Reza, Mahmoodi Mansour, Nasirizade Manizhe, Ghafoury Roya, Khoshnazar Samane Sadat Khoobbin
Emergency Medicine Management Research Center, Health Management Research Institute, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Department of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
J Family Med Prim Care. 2024 Nov;13(11):4937-4942. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_244_24. Epub 2024 Nov 18.
This study was conducted to assess the response to treatment and compare the effects of nebulized normal saline 0.9% and hypertonic saline 3% in the management of acute bronchiolitis, a condition associated with multiple complications in pediatric patients.
In this clinical trial, a total of 60 children diagnosed with viral bronchiolitis in the autumn and winter of 2018 at Ali Asghar Children's Hospital's emergency department were enrolled. The cohort consisted of 30 children in the control group treated with normal saline 0.9% nebulization and 30 in the treatment group treated with 3% hypertonic saline nebulization. Demographic variables, symptom onset duration, and initial heart and respiratory rates were recorded. Disease severity was assessed using the Respiratory Distress Assessment Index (RDAI). Data were analyzed using SPSS software.
Following treatment, both groups exhibited significant improvements in vital signs (respiratory rate, heart rate, and oxygen saturation) and RDAI scores ( value < 0.001). However, there was no statistically significant difference in the degree of improvement in vital signs and RDAI scores between the two treatment groups ( value > 0.05). The mean hospital stay duration did not significantly differ between the groups ( value = 0.16).
Nebulized hypertonic saline and normal saline both effectively ameliorated symptoms in children with bronchiolitis. The absence of a significant difference between these treatments suggests that either can be recommended for use in the pediatric population experiencing acute bronchiolitis symptoms.
本研究旨在评估治疗反应,并比较0.9%生理盐水雾化和3%高渗盐水雾化在小儿急性细支气管炎治疗中的效果,急性细支气管炎是一种与儿科患者多种并发症相关的疾病。
在这项临床试验中,纳入了2018年秋冬在阿里·阿斯加尔儿童医院急诊科诊断为病毒性细支气管炎的60名儿童。该队列包括30名接受0.9%生理盐水雾化治疗的对照组儿童和30名接受3%高渗盐水雾化治疗的治疗组儿童。记录人口统计学变量、症状发作持续时间以及初始心率和呼吸频率。使用呼吸窘迫评估指数(RDAI)评估疾病严重程度。数据使用SPSS软件进行分析。
治疗后,两组的生命体征(呼吸频率、心率和血氧饱和度)和RDAI评分均有显著改善( 值<0.001)。然而,两个治疗组在生命体征和RDAI评分的改善程度上没有统计学显著差异( 值>0.05)。两组的平均住院时间没有显著差异( 值=0.16)。
雾化高渗盐水和生理盐水均能有效改善细支气管炎患儿的症状。这些治疗方法之间没有显著差异,这表明在出现急性细支气管炎症状的儿科人群中,两种方法均可推荐使用。