Suppr超能文献

急诊科雾化吸入3%高渗盐水联合肾上腺素治疗急性细支气管炎的随机试验

A randomized trial of nebulized 3% hypertonic saline with epinephrine in the treatment of acute bronchiolitis in the emergency department.

作者信息

Grewal Simran, Ali Samina, McConnell Don W, Vandermeer Ben, Klassen Terry P

机构信息

Division of Pediatric Emergency, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009 Nov;163(11):1007-12. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2009.196.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether nebulized 3% hypertonic saline with epinephrine is more effective than nebulized 0.9% saline with epinephrine in the treatment of bronchiolitis in the emergency department.

DESIGN

Randomized, double-blind, controlled trial.

SETTING

Single-center urban pediatric emergency department.

PARTICIPANTS

Infants younger than 12 months with mild to moderate bronchiolitis.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomized to receive nebulized racemic epinephrine in either hypertonic or normal saline.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measure was the change in respiratory distress, as measured by the Respiratory Assessment Change Score (RACS) from baseline to 120 minutes. The change in oxygen saturation was also determined. Secondary outcome measures included the rates of hospital admission and return to the emergency department.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients were enrolled and evaluated. The 2 study groups had similar baseline characteristics. The RACS from baseline to 120 minutes demonstrated no improvement in respiratory distress in the hypertonic saline group compared with the normal saline control group. The change in oxygen saturation in the hypertonic saline group was not significant when compared with the control group. Rates of admission and return to the emergency department were not different between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In the treatment of acute bronchiolitis, hypertonic saline and epinephrine did not improve clinical outcome any more than normal saline and epinephrine in the emergency setting. This differs from previously published results of outpatient and inpatient populations and merits further evaluation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN66632312.

摘要

目的

确定在急诊科治疗细支气管炎时,雾化吸入3%高渗盐水加肾上腺素是否比雾化吸入0.9%盐水加肾上腺素更有效。

设计

随机、双盲、对照试验。

地点

单中心城市儿科急诊科。

参与者

12个月以下患有轻至中度细支气管炎的婴儿。

干预措施

将患者随机分为接受高渗盐水或生理盐水雾化吸入消旋肾上腺素治疗。

观察指标

主要观察指标是呼吸窘迫的变化,通过呼吸评估变化评分(RACS)从基线至120分钟进行测量。还测定了血氧饱和度的变化。次要观察指标包括住院率和返回急诊科的比率。

结果

46例患者入组并接受评估。两个研究组的基线特征相似。与生理盐水对照组相比,高渗盐水组从基线至120分钟的RACS显示呼吸窘迫无改善。与对照组相比,高渗盐水组血氧饱和度的变化不显著。两组之间的住院率和返回急诊科的比率没有差异。

结论

在急诊科治疗急性细支气管炎时,高渗盐水加肾上腺素在改善临床结局方面并不比生理盐水加肾上腺素更有效。这与先前发表的门诊和住院患者的结果不同,值得进一步评估。

试验注册

isrctn.org标识符:ISRCTN66632312。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验