Monti Manuela Carla, Bauer Melanie, Koch Konrad, Scheurer Eva, Schlotterbeck Götz
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Department of Radiology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Drug Test Anal. 2025 Aug;17(8):1405-1416. doi: 10.1002/dta.3843. Epub 2024 Dec 26.
Drug checking services (DCS) are entities that allow recreational drug users to have street drug samples analyzed. Diverse analytical methods are applied for DCS, ranging from test strips to mass spectrometry (MS). This work evaluates the performance and utility of common methodologies used for DCS operating with off-site drug testing, while additionally assessing the potential of gas chromatography coupled to vapor phase infrared spectroscopy (GC-IR). Gas chromatography MS (GC-MS), GC-IR, and high-performance liquid chromatography with diode array detector (HPLC-DAD) were evaluated based on the analysis of 145 street drug samples obtained from two Swiss DCS. Additionally, attenuated total reflection Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR) was applied and is briefly discussed. A combined total of 245 analytes (including adulterants and cutting agents) were detected. GC-MS presented the greatest number of detected compounds, with a sensitivity of 96% compared with the sum of all analytes, followed by HPLC-DAD with 82%, while GC-IR showed limited sensitivity with 70%. GC-IR underperformed regarding the detection of low-abundant adulterants and of the main active ingredients in strongly adulterated samples. This study discusses the limitations and strengths of the evaluated methods in the specific context of DCS, while providing insights into the occurrence of false declarations (differing analytical results compared with alleged drug identity) and the distributions of adulterants and cutting agents in street drug samples. Based on our results, complementary approaches are considered the most valuable. Finally, the promotion of comprehensive guidelines regarding the quality and suitability of analytical methods for DCS would be highly desired.
毒品检测服务(DCS)是允许娱乐性毒品使用者对街头毒品样本进行分析的实体。DCS应用了多种分析方法,从试纸条到质谱(MS)。这项工作评估了用于场外毒品检测的DCS常用方法的性能和效用,同时还评估了气相色谱与气相红外光谱联用(GC-IR)的潜力。基于对从两个瑞士DCS获得的145个街头毒品样本的分析,对气相色谱-质谱(GC-MS)、GC-IR和配备二极管阵列检测器的高效液相色谱(HPLC-DAD)进行了评估。此外,还应用了衰减全反射傅里叶变换红外光谱(ATR-FTIR)并进行了简要讨论。总共检测到245种分析物(包括掺杂物和稀释剂)。GC-MS检测到的化合物数量最多,与所有分析物的总和相比灵敏度为96%,其次是HPLC-DAD,灵敏度为82%,而GC-IR的灵敏度有限,为70%。在检测低含量掺杂物和高度掺假样本中的主要活性成分方面,GC-IR表现不佳。本研究讨论了在DCS的特定背景下评估方法的局限性和优势,同时深入了解了虚假申报(与声称的毒品身份相比分析结果不同)的发生情况以及街头毒品样本中掺杂物和稀释剂的分布。根据我们的结果,互补方法被认为是最有价值的。最后,非常希望能推广关于DCS分析方法质量和适用性的全面指南。