• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

沙特食品药品管理局药品临床试验质量管理规范检查结果的描述性分析

Descriptive Analysis of Good Clinical Practice Inspection Findings from the Saudi Food and Drug Authority.

作者信息

Arab Omaima O, Aldayan Mohammed, Almowaizri Khalid, Alghamdi Ahmad, Alghamdi Jahad, Alharf Adel

机构信息

Clinical Trials Department Benefit and Risk Assessment Executive Directorate Drug Sector - Saudi Food and Drug Authority, Riyadh, 13513- 7148, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2025 Mar;59(2):295-303. doi: 10.1007/s43441-024-00731-5. Epub 2024 Dec 26.

DOI:10.1007/s43441-024-00731-5
PMID:39724254
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11880033/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The Saudi Food and Drug Authority (SFDA) conducts inspections in accordance with Good Clinical Practice (GCP) to safeguard clinical trial integrity and protect the rights, safety, and welfare of study participants. These inspections ensure that trials are conducted in compliance with GCP and applicable laws.

OBJECTIVES

The study aims to provide a description of GCP inspection findings, analyze their impact on the clinical trial ecosystem, and provide recommendations to improve clinical trial conduction in Saudi Arabia.

METHODS

A review was conducted on inspection reports, with two senior independent inspectors examining, collecting, and categorizing the data. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the categorical variable via frequency distributions.

RESULTS

A total of 131 GCP inspections were performed between 2017 and 2023, totaling 722 observations from 116 (88.5%) inspection visits. The remaining 15 (11.5%) inspection visits recorded no observations. The highest number of visits were conducted in contract research organizations (CRO) (n = 50; 38.2%) with 118 observations, followed by clinical investigator sites (n = 46; 35.1%) with 313 observations, then bioequivalence (BE) centers (n = 33; 25.2%) with 256 observations, and the last 2 (1.5%) visits were conducted in phase I clinical trial units with 35 observations.

CONCLUSION

This study assesses GCP inspection reports and examines the types of deficiencies and their grades in each area. Observation categories and grades were found to vary by organization type, which indicates the need for specific action plans addressing each organization type separately. This report provided recommendations based on the most common findings to assist researchers and sponsors when conducting clinical trials in Saudi Arabia.

摘要

引言

沙特食品药品管理局(SFDA)按照《药物临床试验质量管理规范》(GCP)进行检查,以维护临床试验的完整性,并保护研究参与者的权利、安全和福祉。这些检查确保试验按照GCP和适用法律进行。

目的

本研究旨在描述GCP检查结果,分析其对临床试验生态系统的影响,并提出改进沙特阿拉伯临床试验开展的建议。

方法

对检查报告进行回顾,由两名资深独立检查员检查、收集和分类数据。使用描述性统计通过频率分布总结分类变量。

结果

2017年至2023年期间共进行了131次GCP检查,来自116次(88.5%)检查访问的观察结果共计722项。其余15次(11.5%)检查访问未记录观察结果。访问次数最多的是合同研究组织(CRO)(n = 50;38.2%),有118项观察结果,其次是临床研究者站点(n = 46;35.1%),有313项观察结果,然后是生物等效性(BE)中心(n = 33;25.2%),有256项观察结果,最后2次(1.5%)访问是在Ⅰ期临床试验单位,有35项观察结果。

结论

本研究评估了GCP检查报告,并检查了每个领域的缺陷类型及其等级。发现观察类别和等级因组织类型而异,这表明需要针对每种组织类型分别制定具体的行动计划。本报告根据最常见的发现提出了建议,以协助研究人员和申办者在沙特阿拉伯进行临床试验。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb19/11880033/ae4de1a50087/43441_2024_731_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb19/11880033/2442a42273d5/43441_2024_731_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb19/11880033/e00f010b2b20/43441_2024_731_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb19/11880033/605926d27e88/43441_2024_731_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb19/11880033/118107db7ef0/43441_2024_731_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb19/11880033/a9d969a831d5/43441_2024_731_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb19/11880033/373f67b3bb58/43441_2024_731_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb19/11880033/9c47858b6cf5/43441_2024_731_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb19/11880033/ae4de1a50087/43441_2024_731_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb19/11880033/2442a42273d5/43441_2024_731_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb19/11880033/e00f010b2b20/43441_2024_731_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb19/11880033/605926d27e88/43441_2024_731_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb19/11880033/118107db7ef0/43441_2024_731_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb19/11880033/a9d969a831d5/43441_2024_731_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb19/11880033/373f67b3bb58/43441_2024_731_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb19/11880033/9c47858b6cf5/43441_2024_731_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb19/11880033/ae4de1a50087/43441_2024_731_Fig8_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Descriptive Analysis of Good Clinical Practice Inspection Findings from the Saudi Food and Drug Authority.沙特食品药品管理局药品临床试验质量管理规范检查结果的描述性分析
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2025 Mar;59(2):295-303. doi: 10.1007/s43441-024-00731-5. Epub 2024 Dec 26.
2
Descriptive Analysis of Good Clinical Practice Inspection Findings from U.S. Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency.美国食品药品监督管理局和欧洲药品管理局良好临床实践检查结果的描述性分析。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2022 Sep;56(5):753-764. doi: 10.1007/s43441-022-00417-w. Epub 2022 May 24.
3
Key Findings from Pharmacovigilance Inspections in Saudi Arabia's Pharmaceutical Sector.沙特阿拉伯制药行业药物警戒检查的主要发现。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2025 Jul;59(4):817-824. doi: 10.1007/s43441-025-00781-3. Epub 2025 Apr 14.
4
GCP inspections in Germany and Europe following the implementation of the Directive 2001/20/EC.在实施2001/20/EC指令后德国和欧洲的药物临床试验质量管理规范检查
Ger Med Sci. 2009 Mar 31;7:Doc01. doi: 10.3205/000060.
5
Comparison of Good Clinical Practice Inspection Processes for Marketing Applications Between the United States Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency.美国食品药品监督管理局与欧洲药品管理局营销申请良好临床规范检查流程比较。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2023 Jan;57(1):79-85. doi: 10.1007/s43441-022-00441-w. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
6
Reflections on the Saudi FDA Regulatory Experience with Smart GxP Inspections.沙特食品药品监督管理局对智能 GxP 检查的监管经验的思考。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2024 Jul;58(4):730-745. doi: 10.1007/s43441-024-00647-0. Epub 2024 Apr 10.
7
Bioequivalence trials for the approval of generic drugs in Saudi Arabia: a descriptive analysis of design aspects.在沙特阿拉伯,仿制药批准的生物等效性试验:设计方面的描述性分析。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Apr 5;24(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02207-4.
8
[GCP inspections of clinical trials].[临床试验的药物临床试验质量管理规范检查]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2005 Feb;48(2):181-8. doi: 10.1007/s00103-004-0976-3.
9
A descriptive research: Exclusion from submitted clinical data package in the review process of new drug approval due to GCP violation in Japan.一项描述性研究:在日本新药审批审查过程中,因违反《药物临床试验质量管理规范》而被排除在提交的临床数据包之外。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2019 Jul 19;15:100416. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100416. eCollection 2019 Sep.
10
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.

本文引用的文献

1
Descriptive Analysis of Good Clinical Practice Inspection Findings from U.S. Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency.美国食品药品监督管理局和欧洲药品管理局良好临床实践检查结果的描述性分析。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2022 Sep;56(5):753-764. doi: 10.1007/s43441-022-00417-w. Epub 2022 May 24.
2
Directive 2001/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 April 2001 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the member states relating to the implementation of good clinical practice in the conduct of clinical trials on medicinal products for human use.欧洲议会和理事会2001年4月4日关于协调各成员国有关在人用药品临床试验实施中适用良好临床实践的法律、法规及行政规定的第2001/20/EC号指令。
Med Etika Bioet. 2002 Spring-Summer;9(1-2):12-9.