Nienhuijs Simon W, Bruinsma Floris, Schouten Ruben, Hoogbergen Maarten M, Cnossen Nienke G, Gernette Chantal, van Rossum Elisabeth F C, de Vries Claire E E, Monpellier Valery M, Klassen Anne F, Pusic Andrea L, Liem Ronald S L
Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, NUTRIM School for Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, 6229 ER, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Obes Surg. 2025 Jan;35(1):67-77. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07615-5. Epub 2024 Dec 26.
Patient-reported outcomes are important as obesity is a chronic disease with a substantial impact. A multidisciplinary task force selected six scales (48 questions) from the validated BODY-Q questionnaire. This subset was gradually introduced and evaluated in a mandatory nationwide registry. The focus was to assess the scale's module results and its feasibility in a quality registry.
All Dutch patients undergoing bariatric surgery between 2019 and 2022 were selected. Completed questionnaires of RAND-36, EQ-5D-5L, and BODY-Q were reviewed with baseline and 1-year results. Uni- and multivariable regression analyses were performed to assess the relationship between baseline characteristics and quality of life scores over time.
A total of 10,972 patients completed at least one BODY-Q scale. The lowest score was on the body image scale preoperatively (28.2, SD 20.9) and the highest on the social scale postoperatively (76.2, SD 18.8). A representative group of 510 patients with repeated measurements showed the most improvement on the body image scale (+ 32.2) followed by physical function (+ 26.3). Multivariable linear regression analysis showed a significant influence, primarily for gender, age, and BMI on BODY-Q scores. Score improvement for BODY-Q was mainly driven by weight loss, while EQ-5D-5L and RAND-36 showed no clear pattern. Comparing the three questionnaires showed significant correlations for physical and social function only.
The BODY-Q obesity module demonstrates potential as a relevant PROM for inclusion in a quality registry. BODY-Q scores provide a foundation for future research, with notable improvements in quality of life observed, particularly in the body image and physical function scales.
由于肥胖是一种具有重大影响的慢性疾病,患者报告的结局很重要。一个多学科特别工作组从经过验证的BODY-Q问卷中挑选了六个量表(48个问题)。这个子集在一个全国性强制登记处逐步引入并进行评估。重点是评估该量表的模块结果及其在质量登记处的可行性。
选取2019年至2022年间所有接受减肥手术的荷兰患者。对RAND-36、EQ-5D-5L和BODY-Q的完整问卷进行了基线和1年结果审查。进行单变量和多变量回归分析,以评估基线特征与随时间变化的生活质量得分之间的关系。
共有10972名患者至少完成了一个BODY-Q量表。术前身体形象量表得分最低(28.2,标准差20.9),术后社会量表得分最高(76.2,标准差18.8)。一组有510名患者进行重复测量的代表性样本显示,身体形象量表改善最为明显(+32.2),其次是身体功能量表(+26.3)。多变量线性回归分析显示,性别、年龄和体重指数对BODY-Q得分有显著影响。BODY-Q得分的提高主要由体重减轻驱动,而EQ-5D-5L和RAND-36则没有明显模式。比较这三份问卷发现,仅在身体和社会功能方面存在显著相关性。
BODY-Q肥胖模块显示出作为相关患者报告结局指标纳入质量登记处的潜力。BODY-Q得分可为未来研究提供基础,观察到生活质量有显著改善,尤其是在身体形象和身体功能量表方面。