Suppr超能文献

开发一项顶点考试作为高级药学实践前经验领域评估。

Development of a capstone exam as pre-advanced pharmacy practice experiences domains assessment.

作者信息

Gionfriddo Michael R, Garmong Gale E, Perry Michael W, Stewart-Lynch Autumn, Koerner Pamela H

机构信息

Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St., Rochester, MN 55902, United States of America.

School of Pharmacy, Duquesne University, 600 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15282, United States of America.

出版信息

Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2025 Mar;17(3):102240. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2024.102240. Epub 2024 Dec 25.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education's (ACPE) standards require pharmacy schools to assess Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experience (APPE) readiness. This paper describes the development and implementation of a Capstone Exam for assessing APPE-readiness and exploration of potential correlations between student performance on the Exam and performance measures within the didactic curriculum.

METHODS

Faculty developed a Capstone examination aligned to the Pre-APPE Domains in Appendix A of the ACPE standards consisting of five stations assessing skills, which include: interviewing, counseling, prescription checking, professional communication, and inpatient order verification. Administered in the spring semester of the third professional year, students must pass all stations to progress to APPEs. Relationships between pass rates for student cohorts in the class of 2017-2023 and grade point average (GPA) and course deficiencies were explored using logistic regression.

RESULTS

Since 2016, first-attempt pass rates fluctuated between 20.3 % and 51.2 % with variability in performance observed across stations and class cohorts. Students with higher GPAs were more likely to pass all stations on the first attempt. Although history of a course deficiency did not affect overall pass rates, it was associated with lower odds of passing the interviewing and order verification stations.

CONCLUSIONS

A Capstone Exam model fulfills the requirements in ACPE Standard 25.8 using a sustainable approach and has supported curricular continuous quality improvement. Findings regarding predictive value of GPA and prior course deficiencies may enable identifying students who would benefit from additional preparation.

摘要

引言

药学教育认证委员会(ACPE)的标准要求药学院评估高级药学实践经验(APPE)准备情况。本文描述了一项用于评估APPE准备情况的顶点考试的开发与实施,并探讨了学生在该考试中的表现与理论课程中的表现指标之间的潜在相关性。

方法

教师们开发了一项与ACPE标准附录A中的APPE前领域相一致的顶点考试,该考试由五个评估技能的站点组成,包括:面谈、咨询、处方核对、专业沟通和住院医嘱核实。该考试在第三专业学年的春季学期进行,学生必须通过所有站点才能进入APPE阶段。使用逻辑回归分析了2017 - 2023届学生群体的通过率与平均绩点(GPA)和课程不及格情况之间的关系。

结果

自2016年以来,首次尝试通过率在20.3%至51.2%之间波动,各站点和班级群体的表现存在差异。GPA较高的学生更有可能首次尝试就通过所有站点。虽然课程不及格历史并未影响总体通过率,但它与通过面谈和医嘱核实站点的较低几率相关。

结论

顶点考试模式采用可持续的方法满足了ACPE标准25.8中的要求,并支持了课程的持续质量改进。关于GPA和先前课程不及格情况的预测价值的研究结果可能有助于识别那些将从额外准备中受益的学生。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验