Llayton Chelsey, Ray Mary Elizabeth, Arnoldi Jennifer, Arif Sally, Edwards Akesha, Hall Leah, Loyer Madison, Weston G Scott
University of Charleston School of Pharmacy, 2300 MacCorkle Ave SE, Charleston, WV 25302, United States of America.
University of Iowa College of Pharmacy, Iowa City, IA, United States of America.
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2025 Mar;17(3):102242. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2024.102242. Epub 2024 Dec 25.
This study assesses the infrastructure and resources surrounding diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility (DEIA) efforts in pharmacy education. The objectives were to investigate leadership roles and qualifications, resource commitment, challenges faced, and proudest accomplishments related to DEIA initiatives in colleges and schools of pharmacy.
A 27-question survey was distributed to CEO deans of US colleges and schools of pharmacy. Descriptive statistics were used for data analysis.
Of the 48 respondents (33 % response rate), 30 (63 %) indicated they utilized a standing DEIA committee and/or a DEIA leader with varying degrees of their position committed to these initiatives. Most leaders (40 %) indicated moderate to significant, but informal training related to their responsibilities. There was wide variation between both allocated salaries or stipends ($0 to >$140,000) and additional budgeted monies for DEIA activities ($0 - > $50,000). Over 90 % of respondents referenced a commitment to DEIA in various institutional documents, and provided multiple training opportunities to faculty, staff, and in some cases, preceptors. The vast majority (91 %) of programs reported having a relationship with their parent institution regarding DEIA, with varying levels of support.
This study provides insights into the landscape of DEIA in pharmacy education. Despite a modest response rate, respondents are representative of the academy highlighting the diversity of DEIA initiatives and leadership approaches across colleges and schools of pharmacy. Further research is needed to explore non-responders' perspectives, assess the impact of DEIA initiatives on educational outcomes and student experiences, and to see how the political landscape since distribution of this survey has changed DEIA initiatives.
本研究评估了药学教育中围绕多元化、公平、包容和可及性(DEIA)工作的基础设施和资源。目标是调查与药学院校DEIA计划相关的领导角色和资质、资源投入、面临的挑战以及最值得骄傲的成就。
向美国药学院校的首席执行官院长发放了一份包含27个问题的调查问卷。采用描述性统计进行数据分析。
在48名受访者(回复率33%)中,30人(63%)表示他们利用了一个常设的DEIA委员会和/或一名DEIA领导者,其职位对这些计划的投入程度各不相同。大多数领导者(40%)表示接受了与其职责相关的适度到大量但非正式的培训。在分配的薪水或津贴(0美元至超过140,000美元)以及DEIA活动的额外预算资金(0美元至超过50,000美元)方面存在很大差异。超过90%的受访者在各种机构文件中提及了对DEIA的承诺,并为教职员工以及在某些情况下为带教老师提供了多种培训机会。绝大多数(91%)项目报告称在DEIA方面与其母体机构有关系,支持程度各不相同。
本研究深入了解了药学教育中的DEIA情况。尽管回复率不高,但受访者代表了学术界,突出了药学院校中DEIA计划和领导方法的多样性。需要进一步研究以探索未回复者的观点,评估DEIA计划对教育成果和学生体验的影响,并了解自本调查发布以来政治环境如何改变了DEIA计划。