Suppr超能文献

一种用于血浆HIV-1 RNA定量的新型病毒载量检测方法在中国与罗氏实时PCR的性能比较。

Performance of a novel viral load assay for plasma HIV-1 RNA quantification compared with Roche real time PCR in China.

作者信息

Li Jiaojiao, He Ruiying, Lin Yaqing, Guo Pengle, Liu Cong, Deng Xizi, Li Linghua, Lan Yun

机构信息

Institute of Infectious Diseases, Guangzhou Eighth People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510440, China.

Guangzhou Institute of Clinical Infectious Diseases, Infectious Disease Center, Guangzhou Eighth People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510440, China.

出版信息

J Virol Methods. 2025 Apr;333:115105. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2024.115105. Epub 2024 Dec 24.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the Sansure HIV-1 VL assay with the Roche Cobas HIV-1 assay in the quantitation of HIV-1 VL and evaluate its application in China. We collected plasma samples from patients infected with HIV-1 or interference patients infected with other viruses. The same samples were subsequently tested using the Sansure HIV-1 VL and Roche Cobas HIV-1 VL assays. Thirty plasma samples from patients not infected with HIV-1 were undetectable using two assays. Overall, agreement was observed for 289 of the 300 samples (96.33 %), with a κ value of 0.92. The Pearson correlation coefficient between the two assays was 0.96. A paired t test revealed no significant difference between the two assays (p = 0.64). Bland-Altman analysis revealed that 97.88 % (185/189) of the paired VLs fell within the 95 % confidence limits of agreement (-0.746-0.768 log10 copies/mL). In particular, the Pearson correlation coefficients for the samples of subtypes CRF01_AE, CRF07_BC, CRF08_BC, and CRF55_01B were 0.98, 0.97, 0.99, and 0.98, respectively. Compared with the Roche Cobas HIV-1 assay, the Sansure HIV-1 VL assay showed good accuracy and linearity and a high correlation, including with HIV subtypes common in China. In addition, the Sansure HIV-1 VL assay is more accessible because of its advantages of price, acquisition and suitability; thus, it can be readily used in China.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较圣湘生物HIV-1病毒载量检测法与罗氏 cobas HIV-1检测法在HIV-1病毒载量定量方面的差异,并评估其在中国的应用情况。我们收集了HIV-1感染患者或感染其他病毒的干扰患者的血浆样本。随后使用圣湘生物HIV-1病毒载量检测法和罗氏cobas HIV-1病毒载量检测法对相同样本进行检测。30份未感染HIV-1患者的血浆样本在两种检测方法中均未检测到。总体而言,300份样本中有289份(96.33%)检测结果一致,κ值为0.92。两种检测方法之间的Pearson相关系数为0.96。配对t检验显示两种检测方法之间无显著差异(p = 0.64)。Bland-Altman分析显示,97.88%(185/189)的配对病毒载量落在一致性的95%置信区间内(-0.746 - 0.768 log10拷贝/mL)。特别是,CRF01_AE、CRF07_BC、CRF08_BC和CRF55_01B亚型样本的Pearson相关系数分别为0.98、0.97、0.99和0.98。与罗氏cobas HIV-1检测法相比,圣湘生物HIV-1病毒载量检测法显示出良好的准确性、线性和高度相关性,包括与中国常见的HIV亚型。此外,圣湘生物HIV-1病毒载量检测法因其价格、获取和适用性等优势更易获得;因此,它可以在中国 readily使用。 (注:“readily”在这里翻译为“容易地、 readily地”,但在中文语境中表述稍显奇怪,可根据实际情况进一步优化表述使其更通顺自然,比如“因此,它在中国易于使用” )

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验